From xemacs-m  Fri Mar 28 15:53:42 1997
Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA01087
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 15:53:41 -0600 (CST)
Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id WAA15405; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 22:42:41 +0100
Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id WAA15534; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 22:51:46 +0100
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: migrating from .xemacs-options to customize
References: <199703280336.UAA20369@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov> 	<rjiv2c5pnv.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk> 	<rvybb74xee.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> 	<199703282119.OAA22181@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov> <199703282133.QAA29669@amber.vis-av.com>
Organization: The Church of Emacs
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Date: 28 Mar 1997 22:51:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: Derrell Lipman's message of Fri, 28 Mar 1997 16:33:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <rjzpvn3csu.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/Emacs 19.34
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Derrell Lipman <derrell@vis-av.com> writes:

> I have not found the startup via a custom-generated configuration to
> be significantly (any?) faster than my old Edit Faces-generated
> configuration.  Is it supposed to be faster?

If loading .xemacs-options took a long time for you, the custom
generated configuration should be much faster.  If not, it shouldn't.

