From xemacs-m  Wed Apr  2 15:20:15 1997
Received: from newman (root@newman.aventail.com [199.238.236.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA26044
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 15:20:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA20619; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:47:03 -0800
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:47:03 -0800
Message-Id: <199704022047.MAA20619@newman>
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, tm-eng@chamonix.jaist.ac.jp
Subject: Re: rtf?
In-Reply-To: <u9bu7x43vu.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
References: <u9bu7x43vu.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;

Neal Becker writes:

>No, not rtfm, rtf.  I tried mailing myself an rtf, using tm C-cC-xC-i.
>Turned into text/richtext.  OK!  Looking at emu.el, I had the impression
>that this actually should do something useful.  There is also
>tl/richtext.el.
>
>When I read the mail (using gnus), it looked like it loaded richtext, and
>might actually do something.  But all I saw displayed was the raw rtf.
>Should I expect more?

  RTF != text/richtext

  Actually, I don't think text/richtext exists anymore.  Last I heard it
had been renamed text/enriched quite a while ago for just this reason.
This is looking for HTMLish things like:

<bigger>Bigger text</bigger>, etc.

-Bill P.

