From xemacs-m  Thu Apr 10 17:36:54 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA29384
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 17:36:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQckso12794; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 18:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 18:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQckso12794.199704102236@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: bug-vm@uunet.uu.net, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: 20.1b12 / VM 6.24 backtrace
In-Reply-To: <199704101915.NAA07742@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
References: <199704101915.NAA07742@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
X-Mailer: VM 6.25 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

John A. Turner writes:
 > [Here's my solution to the "do I send a report involving VM to bug-vm
 >  or xemacs-beta?".  I use vm-submit-bug-report and cc xemacs-beta.
 >  Thus all the state stuff Kyle needs gets included.]
 > 
 > When I try to read Georg Nikodym's recent msg:
 > 
 >   468  N    Georg Nikodym     Apr 10   58/3246  "XEmacs 20.1 beta 12 success"
 > 
 > I get the following in *Backtrace* (XEmacs doesn't die):
 > 
 > Signaling: (error "Invalid image-instantiator format" autodetect)

This is a XEmacs 20.1-beta12 lossage.  Other VM users can forget
about this bug report.  XEmacs beta users can forget about it
after the next beta appears.

