From xemacs-m  Fri Apr 11 03:00:27 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA03956
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 03:00:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQckty24572; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 03:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 03:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQckty24572.199704110743@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [20.1b14]VM: symbols function def is void vm-xemacs-p
In-Reply-To: <m2ybaqm307.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199704110652.XAA08190@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
	<QQcktw23522.199704110706@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2ybaqm307.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.25 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:
 > 
 > > TM lossage.  It is trying to use vm-xemacs-p.
 > 
 > Yup.  In tm-vm.el.
 > 
 > > This function was internal and undocumented,
 > 
 > Sigh.  And we have tons of packages which use the string-match test
 > too.  Why not define an official `running-xemacs' and (try to) be done 
 > with it?

Fine with me.  Matching "XEmacs" (and "Lucid" before that) was
the ordained way to tell, so that's what everyone used.

