From xemacs-m  Sun Apr 13 17:04:06 1997
Received: from bellona.wg.saar.de (uucp@bellona.wg.saar.de [192.109.53.23])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA05672
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 17:03:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from bong.UUCP (uucp@localhost)
	by bellona.wg.saar.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id AAA11149
	for xemacs-beta@xemacs.org; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:03:51 +0200
Received: by bong.slip.wg.saar.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
	id m0wGWjt-000GOrC; Sun, 13 Apr 97 23:23 MET DST
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.1-b15: success linux-2.0.30
References: <m27mi9fwqy.fsf@bong.saar.de> <m27mi7kp73.fsf@bong.saar.de> <m2n2r2lveo.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-PGP-KeyID: 768/7DB556C3 1536/733DF2CD
X-Face: #&x$U{}8a]?xM*.g$p.pp#!*O8v{tD$bYnec}Z*Mik55}H8k8~sCwN,C}s)8mej43?<6k}]Hsuf58O?*+k?FVvA!`H>$tvXNLG|2qvB|ySlMOeL}"Pl/g&omza6Z)A3b|1X5{jF,5qh;\%VR1V-%A~iOq_
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Marc Aurel <4-tea-2@bong.saar.de>
Date: 13 Apr 1997 23:23:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 13 Apr 1997 09:50:07 -0700
Message-ID: <m2iv1qbosj.fsf@bong.saar.de>
Lines: 28
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.45/XEmacs 20.1(beta15)

> Marc Aurel <4-tea-2@bong.saar.de> writes:
>> 20.1-b15 patched up since 20.1-b6, one problem found (see bottom
>> of message).

>>>>> In article <m2n2r2lveo.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>, Steven L Baur
>>>>> <steve@miranova.com> writes:
> Note that you are configuring without MULE support.

Yup, don't understand no Japanese...  Should I configure with MULE
anyway? [Pardon if that's a FAQ...]

> It's not a problem.  Have you peeked inside tex-jp.el?  You
> can't use this file unless you have MULE support.  The inner
> workings of AUC TeX are unrelated and unaffected.

I suspected that, thanks for the confirmation.  Actually, reading
this I have some kind of a deja vu; sorry for bringing *this* up
again.

> The main question is, do your etc/auctex/style files get
> bytecompiled?

Not this time, apparently they didn't change for some revisions,
but yes, the .elc files are all newer than the .el files.

-- 
Regards, Marc
<URL:http://www.saar.de/~bong/signatur.html>

