From xemacs-m  Tue Apr 15 19:19:10 1997
Received: from mail.cis.ohio-state.edu (mail.cis.ohio-state.edu [164.107.8.55])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA04599
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:19:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from calico.cis.ohio-state.edu (calico.cis.ohio-state.edu [164.107.142.11]) by mail.cis.ohio-state.edu (8.6.7/8.6.4) with ESMTP id UAA24031; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 20:18:49 -0400
Received: (ware@localhost) by calico.cis.ohio-state.edu (8.8.0/8.6.4) id UAA15048; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 20:18:50 -0400 (EDT)
To: Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr
Cc: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: multi-threaded XEmacs lisp interpreter
References: <m2wwq3svck.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <87k9m3zvth.fsf@atlas.infra.CARNet.hr>
From: Pete Ware <ware@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 15 Apr 1997 20:18:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: Zlatko Calusic's message of 16 Apr 1997 01:53:58 +0200
Message-ID: <vwm67xnkefr.fsf@calico.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.36/XEmacs 19.15(beta104)

Hmm, same thing on on HP-UX 9.05 (i.e. dumped emacs hasn't moved data
into the text segment):

	size xemacs temacs
	xemacs: 3436688 + 927160 + 278346 = 4642194
	temacs: 3436688 + 927160 + 278346 = 4642194

Wait, why is the _data_ size the same?  Or is it because the puresize
adjustment is doing such a good job (but the problem is still there).

--pete

