From xemacs-m  Sun Dec 29 20:44:36 1996
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id UAA12403 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 20:44:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQbwgo27957; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 21:44:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 21:44:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQbwgo27957.199612300244@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: VM 5.97 released
In-Reply-To: <m2loagiwpb.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <QQbvfz13214.199612222156@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<vk681tnnrr.fsf@suomi.i-have-a-misconfigured-system-so-shoot-me>
	<m2enghm6g9.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<vkvi9t6og1.fsf@suomi.i-have-a-misconfigured-system-so-shoot-me>
	<QQbwfy24179.199612292231@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2loagiwpb.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>

Steven L. Baur writes:
 > Kyle> Mail-Copies-To is non-standard and only relevant to
 > Kyle> newsreaders as far as I know.  So why should VM care
 > Kyle> about it?
 > 
 > Because it is useful with mailing lists too and is the only
 > mechanism so far invented that allows one to say
 > automatically, ``I am subscribed to this list, please do not
 > spam me with two copies of a reply.''  Or conversely, ``I am
 > not subscribed to this list, please Cc me on replies.''

Just to make sure I understand...

If this Mail-Copies-To header is present, `reply all' should
only send mail to the addresses listed in the header?

