From xemacs-m  Sun Apr 20 09:15:05 1997
Received: from server21.digital.fr (server21.digital.fr [193.56.15.21])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00340
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 09:15:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.vbo.dec.com (mail.vbo.dec.com [16.36.208.34]) by server21.digital.fr (8.7.5/8.7) with ESMTP id QAA25500 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:20:50 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from vbormc.vbo.dec.com (vbormc.vbo.dec.com [16.36.208.94]) by mail.vbo.dec.com (8.7.3/8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15661 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:15:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from clusaz.gvc.dec.com (clusaz.gvc.dec.com [16.184.176.21]) by vbormc.vbo.dec.com (8.7.3/8.7) with SMTP id QAA09254 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:06:15 +0200
Received: from fornet.gvc.dec.com by clusaz.gvc.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/04Jan97-0611PM)
	id AA03556; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:14:27 +0200
Received: by fornet.gvc.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/23Sep96-1024AM)
	id AA21086; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:14:27 +0200
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 16:14:27 +0200
Message-Id: <9704201414.AA21086@fornet.gvc.dec.com>
From: Steve Carney <carney@gvc.dec.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.2-b1 build success on Digital UNIX V4.0B
In-Reply-To: <m2iv1h23mu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <9704201337.AA03524@clusaz.gvc.dec.com>
	<m2iv1h23mu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.27 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta1)
Reply-To: carney@gvc.dec.com
X-Face: (d*XRr}%:j,s*8+_o];-"-<<Sd1>H?Ds*>_vV}6DVjhNkjSRW0z^9[WBrbtMma>lyW6u>r(
 9U_m6J0kh7U=q?(h[7<YtS!Cu[Yl)D_XSCy5+tw>_2qr&4S=n|A*ScV]5BR{3]YXk$!,4l2vh9B]}&
 0p"&#\I

steve@miranova.com (Steven L Baur) writes,
in <m2iv1h23mu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>:

>Steve Carney <carney@gvc.dec.com> writes:
>>After applying the patch I sent in for 20.1 there were no problems
>>building.  decosf4-0-static.h has been appropriately renamed, thanks.
>
>The one that makes DECnet selectable?  I've now applied it.

No, the patch to Makefile.in.in, tooltalk.c, and decosf4-0.h.

>Did you ever manage to repeat or get a handle on the VM hanging bug
>you reported for 20.1beta15?

The VM hangs happened a few times, then went away.

On another note, the unresolved subprocess startup crashes in previous
versions (in select_filedesc since 19.14) are much less frequent in
20.x.

        Steve

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Steve Carney        TEL:[41](22)782.90.60  http://www-digital.cern.ch/carney/
carney@gvc.dec.com  FAX:[41](22)782.94.92 

