From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 21 06:08:03 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA16663
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 06:07:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id NAA22574; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 13:07:49 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Losing a frame
References: <kighgh1frav.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m2vi5hmqns.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <bysp0k63ym.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 21 Apr 1997 13:07:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of 21 Apr 1997 12:54:41 +0200
Message-ID: <kigu3l0bpmj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.45/XEmacs 19.15

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:

> This fixes it. This is all because of this (eq bla-bla 't) stuff.
> Isn't this really unlisp-like?

(eq bla-bla t) is unlispy if `bla-bla' is supposed to be a boolean.
Otherwise, I don't think there's anything wrong with it.  In this
case, since in the visibility could also be 'icon, the explicit test
against t was a necessity.

> iconify-emacs is highly inapproporate with virtual sreens anyway.

I'd prefer `C-z' to be bound to `iconify-frame', anyway.  What do the
others think about the usability of the current `C-z' binding in X?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it."                                    -- Donald Knuth

