From xemacs-m  Tue Apr 22 10:18:10 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA15244
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 10:17:35 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from midget.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@midget [129.132.145.4]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id RAA03623 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:16:48 +0200
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by midget.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/D-MATH-client) id RAA05325; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:16:24 +0200
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Ssubprocess, SIGCHLD problems again (sorry) (19.15p2)
References: <byohb71855.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 22 Apr 1997 17:16:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of 22 Apr 1997 15:47:50 +0200
Message-ID: <byhggz141k.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:

> I have delaying giving
> We get partially reproducible () situtation
> Some users can reproduce it more easily others :-(

I need some sugar!

I hope you guys could still decrypt what I meant.

Jan

