From xemacs-m  Thu Apr 24 01:27:55 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA20349
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 01:27:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id IAA19101; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:27:49 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.2-b2 is released
References: <m2yba93pyx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: <URL:http://www.promo.net/pg/nl/pgny_nov96.html>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 24 Apr 1997 08:27:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 23 Apr 1997 23:16:38 -0700
Message-ID: <kigyba9j5p7.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.45/XEmacs 19.15

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> This is all bug fixes with one exception.  Based on Kyle's comment
> about LRECORD_SYMBOL, I tried running with that #define removed in
> lisp.h and found that I got about a 5% speed up.  As far as I'm
> concerned, I'll take the speed up.  XEmacs v20/Latin-1 should now be
> noticeably faster than XEmacs 19.15.

What are the side-effects?  I certainly like the speedup (5% is an
excellent speedup) -- but will it cause increased memory usage, or
some other undesirable effect?

> -- Reverted to custom-1.84

Wasn't 1.86 in 20.1-final?  Uh, my memory...

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Psychos _do not_ explode when sunlight hits them."

