From xemacs-m  Thu Apr 24 21:49:18 1997
Received: from ns.jsys.co.jp (ns.jsys.co.jp [202.33.240.82])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA18214
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 21:49:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cosmos.jsys.co.jp (cosmos.jsys.co.jp [172.31.80.5])
	by ns.jsys.co.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA12577;
	Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:49:14 +0900 (JST)
Received: from skywalk.jsys.co.jp (j-04110.jsys.co.jp [172.31.49.72])
	by cosmos.jsys.co.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA23019;
	Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:49:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from ienaga@localhost) by skywalk.jsys.co.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2) id LAA00792; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:49:12 +0900 (JST)
To: Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Canna 3.2 or 3.5b2 ?(Re: 20.2b2 success on Linux)
References: <m2rafzzzbd.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199704250114.KAA07221@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
X-Face: czfHfB+cCdftWr4Fwe9^^-!_PKouj^vkcIk4Hg_xxx<~JF.4vv)^7jM;w_w'(UZ#{K&xpz:
 [v3`j%a.u`CP*Tbsm[N0PYlk&+xt3Vd1KZL%'I+v,:*0\(akF?Vf>l_VeOHH]2.Z6^e_O;zDZJW.
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Kazuyuki IENAGA <ienaga@jsys.co.jp>
Date: 25 Apr 1997 11:48:55 +0900
In-Reply-To: Kazuyoshi Furutaka's message of Fri, 25 Apr 1997 10:14:39 +0900
Message-ID: <rysn2qnzujs.fsf@skywalk.jsys.co.jp>
Lines: 33
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/XEmacs 20.2(beta2)

Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> writes:

> > > Of course, Canna 3.2 is OLD...
> > 
> > How should this be tested?  Is it possible to have a dual installation 
> > of Canna 3.2 and 3.5b2?  I've only built with 3.5b2 and it seems O.K.
> 
> No, I think we can't...   > any guru? (Japanese Linuxer? Ienaga san?)

If you want to install both versions of Canna, you need to modify its
source code (in 3.5b2 canna/protodefs.h, #define IR_SERVICE_NAME
"canna" which used by getservbyname(3)), and change the install target 
directory.
Then probably both Cannas will work on the different TCP ports.
I'v not tested it.

But you have to make two version of XEmacs for each Canna.
So it's complex to do on one box.

Now I extracted both versions of Canna into my working directory,
checked just README and INSTALL files then I support 3.5b2 with these
reason:

    1.  3.5b2 is newer and it supports (tested on) latest operating
	systems than 3.2 according to INSTALL file.

    2.  Basically, the API has not changed so that we can use 3.5b2
	with XEmacs or is there someone's effort?

    3.  Bugs might have fixed (and breeds new bugs? :-).

-- 
kazz

