From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 28 13:23:15 1997
Received: from canker.atype.com (jsc@canker.atype.com [137.103.200.167])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA07539
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 13:23:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from jsc@localhost)
	by canker.atype.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA23511;
	Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:22:34 -0400
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: gnuattach lossage
References: <199704251604.MAA07892@canker.atype.com> <kigiv1a5gof.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: jsc@atype.com (Jin S. Choi)
Date: 28 Apr 1997 14:22:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 26 Apr 1997 10:31:12 +0200
Message-ID: <x43esb2eja.fsf@canker.atype.com>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/XEmacs 20.2(beta3)

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> "Jin S. Choi" <jsc@atype.com> writes:
> 
> > I've been using gnuattach, and it's great, but not quite as cool as
> > running xemacs in screen. There are two significant problems:
> > 1) Can't suspend a gnuattach'ed frame; if you do it kills xemacs.
> [...]
> 
> Can you please specify exactly what XEmacs version you are using?
> Thanks.

20.2-b3, but it happens for any version with a gnuattach that works.

