From xemacs-m  Tue Apr 29 19:48:24 1997
Received: from ns.jsys.co.jp (ns.jsys.co.jp [202.33.240.82])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15990
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 19:48:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cosmos.jsys.co.jp (cosmos.jsys.co.jp [172.31.80.5])
	by ns.jsys.co.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA01337
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:48:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: from skywalk.jsys.co.jp (j-04110.jsys.co.jp [172.31.49.72])
	by cosmos.jsys.co.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00260
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:48:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from ienaga@localhost) by skywalk.jsys.co.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2) id JAA18244; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:48:11 +0900 (JST)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Canna 3.2 or 3.5b2 ?(Re: 20.2b2 success on Linux)
References: <m2rafzzzbd.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199704250114.KAA07221@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> <rysn2qnzujs.fsf@skywalk.jsys.co.jp> <m2zpunwzl1.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Face: czfHfB+cCdftWr4Fwe9^^-!_PKouj^vkcIk4Hg_xxx<~JF.4vv)^7jM;w_w'(UZ#{K&xpz:
 [v3`j%a.u`CP*Tbsm[N0PYlk&+xt3Vd1KZL%'I+v,:*0\(akF?Vf>l_VeOHH]2.Z6^e_O;zDZJW.
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Kazuyuki IENAGA <ienaga@jsys.co.jp>
Date: 30 Apr 1997 09:48:09 +0900
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 24 Apr 1997 20:28:26 -0700
Message-ID: <ryswwpll4ja.fsf@skywalk.jsys.co.jp>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/XEmacs 20.2(beta2)

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> Kazuyuki IENAGA <ienaga@jsys.co.jp> writes:
> 
> > Now I extracted both versions of Canna into my working directory,
> > checked just README and INSTALL files then I support 3.5b2 with these
> > reason:
> 
> Those are all good reasons and I agree.  One last question, how do the
> Canna developers feel about us recommending people use a beta version
> of their code?

I posted this question to Canna mailing list and got answer.
Akira Kon, the maintainer of the Canna, said he recommend to use Canna
3.2 because 3.5b2 has a bug in new function which in detail I donot
know.
He also said the bug is being in a key C-k binding in the Canna.

-- 
kazz

