From xemacs-m  Thu May  8 20:40:11 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA10512
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 8 May 1997 20:39:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA10728;
	Thu, 8 May 1997 18:41:03 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: delay?
References: <QQcorj19515.199705081847@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> 	<m2lo5plr07.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <QQcorv22075.199705082159@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@calag.com>
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of Thu, 8 May 1997 17:59:27 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 08 May 1997 18:41:02 -0700
Message-ID: <m2u3kdjuc1.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.51/XEmacs 20.2(beta5)

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:

> For the GNUS problems can we regress to an earlier version?  Or
> with the antinews do we get worse bugs?

Probably.  Many of the recent fixes appear to have come from tweaking
its XEmacs support, I believe.

> I don't consider GNUS bugs to be showstoppers, given GNUS is not
> a core technology.

It depends on whether you use it for mail or not.  (Assume insertion
of some gratuitous comment about how problems of this nature will be
better handled with packages).

> We can try to fix them, but ultimately we should not track them too
> closely unless an interface change we made has screwed Lars in some
> way.
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

