From xemacs-m  Fri Dec  6 07:43:46 1996
Received: from mikan.jaist.ac.jp (mikan.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.8.6]) by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id HAA10139 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 07:43:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from is18e0s01.jaist.ac.jp (MORIOKA Tomohiko <morioka@jaist.ac.jp>) by mikan.jaist.ac.jp (8.7.5); id WAA23505; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 22:43:42 +0900 (JST)
Received: by is18e0s01.jaist.ac.jp (4.1/JE-C); Fri, 6 Dec 96 22:43:41 JST
Sender: morioka@is18e0s01.jaist.ac.jp
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: src/s/*shr.h
References: <199612051703.CAA25450@mikan.jaist.ac.jp> <199612052133.NAA01918@xemacs.eng.sun.com> <m2d8wonkjf.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
From: morioka@jaist.ac.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCPGkyLBsoQiAbJEJDTkknGyhC?= /
 MORIOKA Tomohiko)
Organization: JAIST, Hokuriku / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCS0xOJkBoQzwySjNYGyhC?=
  =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNTs9UUJnM1gxIUJnM1gbKEI=?=
X-Emacs: Mule 2.4 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?KBskQjlITVUybBsoQik=?=
X-Mua: gnus-mime 0.12, tm-view 7.78
X-Face: %yc?f+O/cVKlH*K(H2X/6-d''suf|"1{S:Y0}_9$t@0G3:5M2:-Ck^[8+4^iSLeGc[Ey[WP
 PF]2M#Q9C'u~[=7TJP72J`PZdWvP=s-'-/LhFneC->=ILc~H#$lf2%hLL5U8?psIp`<[>d&@$Pm%~(
 A'"CJ.zuX@TXh\Ra4,b7M&`f"hexU-a4,#X\]Bfp'JI+MGUDRA%_$&UnWAem4}1R"4%uivgn;xFZ%"
 NS>)eCuFYNHc/:W^:{7H>bGQS],x5z[Cy~C;7j#:8y9q|"~9~UWjE<Vm_;)o<Q4S5NweLc(cl7-suY
 NF|_O*xodbmQavM
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.95)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Dec__6_22:43:27_1996-1"; micalg=pgp-md5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 06 Dec 1996 22:43:40 +0900
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 06 Dec 1996 00:28:52 -0800
Message-Id: <s1c7mmvrdo3.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Lines: 62
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/Emacs 19.33

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Dec__6_22:43:27_1996-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>>>>> In <m2d8wonkjf.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 
>>>>>=09Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> wrote:

Martin> There does seem to be a mismatch.  XEmacs today is
Martin> inconsistent, sometimes using "-", sometimes not:

Steven>  ...

Martin> We need to decide on one or the other.

Martin> The advantage of dropping the "-" is for (slight) consistency
Martin> with Emacs 19.34:

Steven>  ...

Martin> The advantage of keeping the "-" is general esthetics.  I vote
Martin> for this choice.  It would be nice if someone who uses
Martin> sunos4*shr would test building with the *shr files renamed
Martin> (Tomohiko ?).

  Yes, I renamed and built.  It works fine (except some troubles.  I
will send patches.  Of course, --dynamic=3Dyes works fine itself).


Steven> Either way is fine with me, so long as we are internally
Steven> consistent. If the worst of our incompatibilities with Emacs
Steven> 19.34 were filenames, I'd go for the scheme they use, but that
Steven> hardly applies today.

  I agree.


  Anyway please modify for consistency.

  Thanks,
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MORIOKA Tomohiko <morioka@jaist.ac.jp>
        Japan advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Hokuriku
                Asahi-dai, Tatsu-no-kuchi ch=F4, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan
------------------------------------------ Frisch, Frei, Fr=F6hlich! ---

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Dec__6_22:43:27_1996-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBMqgjCRnuUGV7wuH5AQFeqgQAtxXnWEPXtprjoFXjJOEuIAUoHM9ZLHzB
2XuFy2rjIjli5m2K3LoQhPocq6wpExYTuX2tzkFnpYKngG2QMpfYH+zWCu8S5wVp
jLoD99unT/VtuFm7ZDGqWyOijNvUB9F4eof7UmIzymCQPDS0pVuyXcG51zHysJvA
wr1XRXkOMI4=
=fgqU
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Dec__6_22:43:27_1996-1--

