From xemacs-m  Mon May 12 00:43:35 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA28657
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 12 May 1997 00:43:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id HAA19547; Mon, 12 May 1997 07:43:35 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Accessing Lisp builtin variables from C code
X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: <URL:http://www.promo.net/pg/nl/pgny_nov96.html>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 12 May 1997 07:43:34 +0200
Message-ID: <kigrafd1bzt.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 19.15

Is it enough to put:

Lisp_Object Vdefault_frame_name;

or do i need:

extern Lisp_Object Vdefault_frame_name;

By "normal" C rules, I would need the latter.  However, my
multiple-frames patch seems to get it one way or the other, so I'm a
little surprised.  Does XEmacs work some special magic with V* C
symbols?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
WWW:  World-Wide-Waste.  Waste management corporation, which
      handles the billions of tons of garbage generated by just
      about everybody these days.

