From xemacs-m  Mon May 12 11:38:50 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA14010
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:38:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcpfu11426; Mon, 12 May 1997 12:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 12:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcpfu11426.199705121638@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Multiple frames on TTY-s: update
In-Reply-To: <kigiv0o8xyp.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <kigiv0o8xyp.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta6)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

TTY frames ought to be named "emacs" by default.
I see no reason to differ from X frames in this regard.

