From xemacs-m  Tue May 13 17:07:03 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02094
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 13 May 1997 17:07:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA32518;
	Tue, 13 May 1997 15:08:18 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Byte-compiler warning
References: <kig3errdp5u.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <86u3k76no7.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com's message of 13 May 1997 14:56:56 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 13 May 1997 15:08:15 -0700
Message-ID: <m2k9l33u0g.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2

William M Perry <wmperry@aventail.com> writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
>> Is this a leftover warning from days before :syms were interned, or am
>> I doing something wrong?
>> 
>> ** Variable reference to constant :someslot

>   Yup, and absolutely essential for even a prayer of .elc compatibility.

A yup to which question?  (1)Leftover warning, or (2)Hrvoje is doing
something wrong.

What good is the special treatment of :symbols if they can't be
bytecompiled that way?
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

