From xemacs-m  Wed May 14 09:45:10 1997
Received: from fronsac.ensg.u-nancy.fr (fronsac.ensg.u-nancy.fr [192.93.48.17])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA09905
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 14 May 1997 09:45:07 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199705141445.JAA09905@xemacs.org>
Received: by fronsac.ensg.u-nancy.fr
	(8.7.1/16.2) id KAA10901; Wed, 14 May 1997 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard Cognot <cognot@ensg.u-nancy.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
Cc: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: hpux10 Which X?
In-Reply-To: <199705140900.CAA02645@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
References: <u9zptzmm3d.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
	<199705140900.CAA02645@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.26 under 20.1 XEmacs Lucid
Reply-to: cognot@ensg.u-nancy.fr
X-Face:  .|{6#t`YCBNfg_E.8;@IFK9kd'Ol7>~2S7U!o3+g)+\`hV5&I]k,UwC%g%Y\,-KV+[eEgZm
 i(NgMB@L_n/A!jk;}@!?$<t5Aw`B$R=xJSv[F$2&sz*cwxF!|B3)MH,6YBDNU!$9;91N_p*>}</%ZO
 +EYRSc{a_#KXB)sJlPpxQq,/:}\*noO!;(5PY~MTnspl;&XA$JccP;N~;v5E>Yh.


>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:

    Martin> HP experts, what do we do?  X11R5 CDE is likely the safe
    Martin> route.

I'm not using CDE at all... So X11R6 is fine for me.

The 10.20 binary kit for hpux 10.20 was built with X11R6 and CDE, so I 
guess that works fine, since I didn't get any complains about that ;-)

Richard.

-- 
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard Cognot           | Proceed, with fingers crossed... |
|                          |           /\^^/\                 |
| <cognot@ensg.u-nancy.fr> |             `'                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| http://www.ensg.u-nancy.fr/~cognot                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|

