From xemacs-m  Wed May 14 18:53:17 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA26798
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:53:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcpoh04653; Wed, 14 May 1997 19:53:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 19:53:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcpoh04653.199705142353@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Byte-compiler warning 
In-Reply-To: <9705142333.AA03165@thymus.synaptics.com>
References: <rviv0lrdhn.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
	<9705142333.AA03165@thymus.synaptics.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta6)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Dave Gillespie writes:
 > Note:  Some things that may look like relics in CL are not.  For
 > example, there is a reason the CL package internally uses `cl-push'
 > instead of `push', and avoids using `caddr', etc., for many
 > internal functions.  This was done to ensure that each of the
 > CL component files could be byte-compiled in isolation, without
 > having to compile or load any other CL components.  Maybe this
 > doesn't matter anymore now that CL is always installed and cl.el
 > itself is preloaded, but one would definitely want to think about
 > the issue carefully before messing around with that aspect of the
 > code.

At the very least the above block of text ought to be inserted
into the CL files, if it isn't there in some form already.

