From xemacs-m  Wed May 14 20:05:09 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA28894
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 14 May 1997 20:05:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA20117;
	Wed, 14 May 1997 18:06:20 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: FAILURE on Linux 2.0.18 (I spoke too soon earlier...)
References: <s56k9l1g0wv.fsf@portnoy.mit.edu>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Jered J Floyd's message of 14 May 1997 18:10:40 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 14 May 1997 18:06:19 -0700
Message-ID: <m2aflx4k8k.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2

> I'm going to build it again to see if that makes a difference (I'll
> build without any optimization.) Any ideas?

I'd suggest building it without Motif before suspecting optimization
(especially just -O).  I've built with Gcc-2.7,2-nosrbug and -O4 since
20.0 beta.

It's apparently bombing while initializing display-time and that
package works fine for me.
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

