From xemacs-m  Fri May 23 09:35:11 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA12782
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 23 May 1997 09:35:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcquc13702; Fri, 23 May 1997 10:34:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 10:34:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcquc13702.199705231434@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>,
        abraham@dina.kvl.dk (Per Abrahamsen)
Subject: M-x customize doesn't work without TTY support
In-Reply-To: <kig206ytxa0.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <kig206ytxa0.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 20.3 XEmacs Lucid (beta1)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Hrvoje Niksic writes:
 > [...]
 > The error is that XEmacs rejects setting of the specifiers the tag of
 > which is invalid.  IMHO this is very wrong, and lots of lots of Lisp
 > code is broken when running without TTYs or without X, because of
 > this.  XEmacs should simply ignore the tags it doesn't know about.  Or 
 > just warn about them.  But not kick me out. :-(
 > 
 > Do the others agree with me?  If yes, I can attempt to fix these bugs.

I agree with you.

