From xemacs-m  Fri May 23 13:22:48 1997
Received: from mantar.slip.netcom.com (mantar.slip.netcom.com [192.187.167.134])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA15204
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 23 May 1997 13:22:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mantar.slip.netcom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mantar.slip.netcom.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA09495;
	Fri, 23 May 1997 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705231822.LAA09495@mantar.slip.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Build semi-faliure b2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 May 1997 01:04:20 PDT."
             <199705230804.BAA19115@xemacs.eng.sun.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 11:22:43 -0700
From: "Manfred A. Antar" <manfred@mantar.slip.netcom.com>

 
> Try adding
> #define LIB_STANDARD -lc
> to s/freebsd.h
> 
> Does that fix it?  (rerun configure and make to test it).
> 
> I am surprised there are compilation environments today where the -lc
> is not implicit.  This behavior is standardized in XPG4, for example.
> I could make "-lc" the default value for LIB_STANDARD instead (this
> was the case previously), but that should be necessary only in
> exceptional cases.  BSD has had an implicit -lc for 20 years.  Is
> FreeBSD really this broken?  Perhaps there are 2 copies of libc installed?
> 
> Martin
> 
Ya that works! funny i've never had that happen before.i guess i should mention
that i'm running FreeBSD current which is also beta :).
Thanks Manfred
===========================
||	mantar@netcom.com	||
||	Ph. (415) 647-4843	||
===========================


