From xemacs-m  Thu May 29 18:19:00 1997
Received: from mail-oak-1.pilot.net (mail-oak-1.pilot.net [198.232.147.16])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02991
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 29 May 1997 18:19:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cogit.com (unknown-79-101.ergosum.com [206.189.79.101]) by mail-oak-1.pilot.net with SMTP id QAA25459 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 29 May 1997 16:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carnifex.cogit.com by cogit.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA23230; Thu, 29 May 1997 16:18:56 -0700
Received: from carnifex.cogit.com by carnifex.cogit.com (SMI-8.6/client-1.3)
	id QAA00549; Thu, 29 May 1997 16:18:57 -0700
Message-Id: <199705292318.QAA00549@carnifex.cogit.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: gud/gdb/gdbsrc/dbx
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 16:18:57 -0700
From: Chris Dean <ctdean@cogit.com>


What is the current state of the XEmacs debugger front ends?  I have
had to abandon gdb (and my beloved gdbsrc mode) and am trying to use
dbx.

Are there any plans to merge these?  I like gdb.el better than the gdb
in gud.el, and dbx not at all.  If I wanted to make a version of the
dbx front end that was friendlier than gud-dbx, where would I start?

Regards,
Chris Dean

