From xemacs-m  Thu Jun  5 17:07:55 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA17993
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 17:07:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Corp.Sun.COM ([129.145.35.78]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id PAA14762 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 15:26:12 -0700
Received: from legba.Corp.Sun.COM by Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id PAA15375; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 15:08:19 -0700
Received: by legba.Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA01134; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 15:08:18 -0700
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: scroll-up defadvice now fails
References: <bci4tbcivpf.fsf@corp.Sun.COM> <m2iuzs7lzx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: GDF
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gary.Foster@Corp.Sun.COM (Gary D. Foster)
Date: 05 Jun 1997 15:08:17 -0700
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 05 Jun 1997 14:55:46 -0700
Message-ID: <bciwwo8hfe6.fsf@corp.Sun.COM>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.55/XEmacs 20.3(beta3)

Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

> Note that this behavior is now built-in to `scroll-up' and the other
> movement functions by doing
> (setq signal-error-on-buffer-boundary nil)
> in .emacs.

I didn't know this.  Thanks.

> I just tried it via `xemacs -q -no-site-file' and it worked as
> expected.  Does it still fail for you when beta3 is invoked with -q?

Yep, that's the first thing I did.

-- Gary F.

