From xemacs-m  Wed Jun 11 07:56:20 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA16101
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 07:56:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id GAA14503 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 06:15:53 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id FAA15567; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:54:42 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id FAA17463; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:54:39 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id FAA16587; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:54:41 -0700
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:54:41 -0700
Message-Id: <199706111254.FAA16587@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: XEmacs Beta Test <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: xpm version configure test
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 20.3 "Zagreb" XEmacs Lucid (beta5)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

I intend to use the following test to check that our Xpm version is
sufficiently up to date.  Can someone with an SGI check that the
broken Xpm installed on that system does in fact fail this test??
If it passes, what exactly is wrong with SGI's xpm?

#include <xpm.h>
#if XpmIncludeVersion < 30406
#error Xpm version too old
#endif

Martin

