From xemacs-m  Fri Jun 13 12:00:19 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA10540
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:00:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id TAA26818; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 19:00:08 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Ebola vaccines
References: <199706112130.RAA27486@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US> 	<864tb4es2d.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com> 	<199706112300.TAA27566@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US> 	<m2wwo03f9u.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199706131548.LAA28785@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 13 Jun 1997 19:00:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Barry A. Warsaw"'s message of Fri, 13 Jun 1997 11:48:58 -0400
Message-ID: <kigwwny4ewa.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.3(beta6)

"Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US> writes:

> One other thing about changing following-char to char-after, etc.  I
> think Hrvoje said that there are no bytecodes for char-after and
> char-before.

No, only `char-before' is missing (as you say yourself later).

However, I still assert that removing `following-char' and
`preceding-char' is *not* necessary in XEmacs 20.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?

