From xemacs-m  Sat Jun 21 10:25:31 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA18750
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:25:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id RAA08532; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 17:25:29 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Quail overlay problem
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 21 Jun 1997 17:25:28 +0200
Message-ID: <kig7mforn9y.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta7) - "Oslo"

I don't find my way through the Quail code, but I think I understand
the overlay emulation now.  The wrong-type-argument error Adrian and
the others experience is caused by passing nil argument to overlay-*
functions (specifically `overlay-move').

This would indicate that either the value of `quail-overlay' somehow
gets corrupted (reset to nil), or it doesn't get initialized at all.
Could someone who understands Quail please step through the relevant
functions and find which one it is?


P.S.
Justified paragraphs are fun -- that's what I've always been saying!
:-)

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
4.  Thou shalt not warlorde a sig if it bee the sig of Kibo, nor if
    it bee the sig of the Inner Circle.

