From xemacs-m  Sun Jun 22 05:08:19 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA14819
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 05:08:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA11882;
	Sun, 22 Jun 1997 03:08:04 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Yet more 64bits lossage
References: <19970621012424.18989@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr> 	<199706210604.XAA07502@xemacs.eng.sun.com> 	<QQcuvx10888.199706210628@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> 	<199706210825.BAA07607@xemacs.eng.sun.com> 	<kigu3iss4tu.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 	<199706211829.LAA08243@xemacs.eng.sun.com> 	<kigwwnnre7y.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <199706211937.MAA08316@xemacs.eng.sun.com> <kig7mfn59km.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "22 Jun 1997 10:24:41 +0200"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 22 Jun 1997 03:08:00 -0700
Message-ID: <m2n2ojlzlr.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta9) - "Sofia"

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> That's nice, but is it really good behavior to use 64-bit type for
> Lisp_Object (which is used constantly throughout the code) on a 32-bit 
> OS?

If we can make `--use-union-type=yes' standard, yes it is. :-)
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

