patch-2.0.37 linux/Documentation/CodingStyle

• Lines: 19
• Date: Tue Dec 29 11:57:33 1998
• Orig file: v2.0.36/linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
• Orig date: Sun Nov 15 10:49:21 1998

diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.0.36/linux/Documentation/CodingStyle linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 at least consider the points made here. 
 
 First off, I'd suggest printing out a copy of the GNU coding standards,
-and NOT read it.  Burn them, it's a great symbolic gesture. 
+and NOT reading it.  Burn them, it's a great symbolic gesture. 
 
 Anyway, here goes:
 
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@
 Heretic people all over the world have claimed that this inconsistency
 is ...  well ...  inconsistent, but all right-thinking people know that
 (a) K&R are _right_ and (b) K&R are right.  Besides, functions are
-special anyway (you can't nest them in C). 
+special anyway (you can't nest them in C (well, you can in gcc, actually,
+but this is horribly nonstandard, so we will ignore it)). 
 
 Note that the closing brace is empty on a line of its own, _except_ in
 the cases where it is followed by a continuation of the same statement,