Having  an  NTSC  monitor next to my workstation, I can now watch
  NASA Select while "working". Here are notes I typed in from today's
  Magellan  briefing.  Please  don't  ask  me  for  further  details,
  because  I  can't  provide  them.  I  do not vouch for the absolute
  accuracy of this material, I'm not a stenographer and it was  going
  by pretty quickly.

    Jon (leech@cs.unc.edu)__@/

    Notes from Magellan Science Briefing on NASA Select - 10/29/91
    ==============================================================


    Wes  Huntress  -  Division  Director,  Solar System & Exploration
  Division

    Venus superficially similar to Earth, but "stunningly different".
  Magellan  good  for understanding geological differences from Earth
  and verifying theories about why it's different.

    Project has completed processing first cycle  data.  1/2  mapping
  data  available  on  22 CD-ROMS, remainder by end of year. "Digital
  treasure chest."

    More than halfway through second cycle; filling in gaps.  Looking
  at  new angles to clarify interpretation. Conducting special tests:
  3D stereo radar imagery. Very successful, plan to cover 70%  in  3D
  stereo in cycle 3 starting Jan. 15.

    Measuring internal structure by mapping gravity field.

    Maat Mons lacks radar reflective surface - is it a new structure?

    New  surface  maps  from radar altimeter + radio science to study
  deep into atmosphere.



  Steve Saunders, JPL - Magellan Project Scientist

    Cycle 2 mapping south pole - about  3/4  done.  Fill  in  gap  at
  superior conjunction (about 80% done). On orbit 3000 since starting
  mapping.

    Global  mosaic  &  projection onto a sphere, looking down from N.
  pole. Topography + other properties from altimetry  data  set.  Can
  see geologic patterns on a global basis. 6 maps: N/S/4 hemispheres.

    Large  equatorial  fracture  system including largest volcanoes -
  Matt Mons, Beta  Regio  -  like  rift  systems  on  Earth.  Totally
  different  features  elsewhere  -  small  scale scarp features like
  subduction scarps in W. Pacific - seeing stretching  &  compression
  - brittle structure case -> buckling.

    Global  look  at volcanic features. Prof. Hedd & students @ Brown
  Smallest domes to largest shield volcanoes.

    Jerry  Schwaber  (sp?)   mapped   impact   craters   -   randomly
  distributed.  [they  look to number in low hundreds on slide - Jon]
  Are we  seeing  catastrophically  resrufaced  Venus  (~800  My)  or
  continuing process with small amounts of vulcanism?

    Mapped  fracture zones. Map major parts giving only an equatorial
  distribution - what's going on? Puzzle. More  extensional  features
  in  N/S,  compressional  in E/W. Another puzzle - would expect them
  to be paired.

    Landslides - Peter Ford of MIT  produced  cycle  1/cycle  2  (low
  incidence)  image.  Still  somewhat  ambiguous; investigators favor
  radar  layover  explanation.  (Two  possible  interpretations   for
  left-looking data, right looking hard to match up). i) Steep slope,
  top closer to radar appears overlapping ii) Actual slumping.

    Stereo  pair  -  L  sensitive  to albedo variation, R to volcanic
  domes.

    Another presentation form -  anaglyph  -  R/B  prints  (in  press
  package). Giant trought 800m deep, 10km across.

    Channels  on  plains  -  intruiging  feature.  plains  are 85% of
  surface, history of plains is history of Venus in last few  100  My
  as  far  as  we  can  see.  Apparently carved by some sort of fluid
  lava. Don't see on Earth, certainly not of  this  length  (100s  of
  kms,  longest  800  km).  Similar  morphology  along  their  entire
  lengths.

    Perspective views to understand relationship of some  features  -
  combine   imaging  &  topography  &  reproject  in  computer.  Same
  technique used for video. Crater farm, Gula Mons  (sp?)  3km  high.
  Matt  Mons  -  9km  high.  Recent  lava  flows pouring over plains.
  Surface of volcano is not bright; this is an exception.

    Corona Artemis - circular  feature  2600km  in  diameter.  Little
  relief  in  interior,  margin is trough 150 km across, 3-4 km deep.
  Flyaround  animation  coming.  Other  chasms  to  N  like   Pacific
  subduction areas.

    Zooming  in  on  trough  in  next  few slides. "Amazingly uniform
  feature."  Models  include  mantle  plumes  rising   &   spreading,
  interacting  with  external  part  of crust causing subduction-like
  patterns.

    Computer generated film of radar  mapping  results  -  Artemis  &
  eastern  Aphrodite  Terra.  Simulated  color  &  radarclinometry to
  enhance small scale features. Mitchell crater into  trough,  Diana,
  Dali chasms. Ascend for view of Artemis @ end.

    Artemis  first  seen  in  radar  @  Goldstone.  Complex topograhy
  (arcuate scarps) at margin. 20x vertical exaggeration. One  of  the
  most useful scientific videos for visualizing scientific videos.



  John Woods, SAO - Radar Investigator.

    Maxwell  Montes  - highest on Venus. Generally displays very high
  reflectivity (observed by Pioneer Venus,  confirmed  by  Magellan).
  Appears  to require that surface has some special mineral component
  which helps reflectivity - opposite of Stealth Bomber. Where  would
  mineral  have  come  from?  Most  surface material is not rock; has
  weathered  into  soil  (exposed  to   warm,   chemically   reactive
  atmosphere  for  100My forming different minerals). On Earth, turns
  into clay & quartz & oxides (soil). On  Venus,  different  kind  of
  soil.  Venus  is  much  hotter at low altitude than on mountaintops
  (170 degrees F) which controls composition  of  minerals  in  soil.
  Helps explain different radar reflectivity behavior. Pyritite (iron
  sulfide) appears only at >5km above plains. Electrically conductive
  mineral  ->  increase  reflectivity,  appears  to be responsible to
  radar bright summits of high mountaintops.

    All except Maat Mons (volcanic peak at E end of Aphrodite  Terra,
  second highest peak on planet).

    Slide  of confusing region - Maat Mons + Alpha Regio. Much higher
  than surrounding bright region, yet  it's  dark.  Can  clearly  see
  volcanic  outflows  -  no  question it's a volcanic edifice, unlike
  Maxwell, which is a tectonic structure. Has a radar bright area  at
  low  altitudes; highest are quite radar dark. Why would this be the
  case? Hypothesis: Maat Mons has not been weathered. Why not? Hasn't
  had time - fresh lava poured out relatively recently. High temp  ->
  very  young  (may  still  be  active). Best candidate for currently
  active volcano. High  priority  given  to  examining  second  cycle
  images taken just last week. Images being processed now.



  Gordon Pettengill, MIT - Principal Investigator

    First  global  topography map; contrasted to Pioneer Venus. About
  10x resolution, covering further into S and N than PV did.

    Distinictive feature - Aphrodite Terra ("Scorpion" for two jaws),
  lowest region, Maxwell (W. edge showing rise of 7-8 km  with  steep
  slopes (> 30 degrees) - obvious result of strong tectonic forces).

    Maat  is  ~8km  above mean. Can now see true height of such small
  volcanic  features  that  weren't  resolved  by  Pioneer.   Putting
  material into context, allows understanding of interconnections.

    Next  slide  shows global emissivity - related to brightness from
  temperature & ability to emit - inverse of reflectivity. A few deep
  blue areas (~30% emissivity, corresponding to  ~70%  reflectivity),
  related  to  Dr. Wood's discussion. Still some S. polar gaps, which
  will be filled in.

    Special experiment done on Oct. 5 - using  telemetry  at  2-3  cm
  X-Band  and  10 cm S-band (normally used for tracking & radar data)
  to probe atmosphere (beam bent by atmosphere). At ~32km (20 mi) up,
  density gradient so high that curvature of ray matches curvature of
  planet -  ray  is  captured!  Can  get  close  to  this.  Advantage
  compared to earlier observations is about 10x more sensitivity with
  Magellan's large antenna & higher transmited power in X-band - goes
  several  km  lower  than previously achieved, and more sensitive to
  attentuation. Hope to place  levels  on  sulfuric  acid  vapor  and
  monitor  amount (indicating amount of volcanic activity). Adds info
  on vertical structure  and  hope  to  get  handle  on  a  different
  constituent of atmosphere.


  Q&A session:


    Plate tectonics controversy?

    Saunder:  don't  think  they've  seen  features  predicted   from
  pre-Magellan  data.  Not plate spreading, but subduction & folding.
  Probably doesn't go on in quite the same way  as  on  Earth,  where
  plates  are  dragged  along,  but  it  may be taking up some of the
  spreading motions seen at ridges.


    Amount  of  data?   Interpretation  of  radar  overlay  ->   what
  confidence in correct interpretation of radar data?

    Saunders:  8  orbits  of  test  data  analyzed by radar experts &
  geologists. Layover almost nonexistent in chosen geometries  except
  in a few areas, a very small fraction of data set.

    Terabits  of  data  -  approaching double amount of imaging data.
  Better global map  of  Venus  than  of  the  Earth  (oceans  poorly
  mapped).

    [Q about weathering I didn't catch - Jon]

    Wood:  Weathering  of Maat Mons would proceed in just a few years
  (<10). Controversial view. Wouldn't bet  a  lot  on  it.  Not  only
  candidate  for  active  volcano, just most prominent - high, stands
  out. May be many others that don't come to attention as rapidly.


    Can quantify reflectivity vs. other materials?

    Gordon: need dielectric of ~80. Only normal candidate  is  water.
  Require unusual mineral, like metallic meterorites.


    What are 5-6 most interesting spots for onsite analysis?

    Saunders:  Alpha  Regio,  parts  of Aphrodite Terra that stand up
  high - may be ancient crustal materials formed by  differentiation.
  Finding  feldspar  would  be  interesting.  Typical  plains  area -
  fundamentally different from volcanoes, much more  extensive,  will
  tell  much  more  about geochemistry of planet. Pancake volcanoes -
  steep sided features. Very dark  areas  -  what  are  they?  Glassy
  material? Fine powder? What interaction of surface is going on?


    Guess on when we might see landers?

    Huntress: Next century. No particular plans to return to Venus in
  this  decade.  Waiting  on results of Magellan before deciding what
  next step should be.  Measure  trace  elements/isotopic  ratios  in
  atmosphere?  Geological  sites/geochemistry?  Both  at  once? As we
  learn more, will develop ideas on what to do next.


    Future Magellan plans?

    Gravity data. Measure crust. Models  indicate  thick  crust,  but
  they're just models.


    What has been learned that wouldn't be known 3 years ago?

    Saunders:  Knew a lot from Pioneer & Venera at 1-2 km resolution.
  Now have global picture to 120m resolution. Details of vulcanism  &
  tectonic  features  seen fuzzily before. Have focused on details of
  processes, know types of volcanoes, can categorize, know there  are
  impact  craters.  Confidence  in  determining  relative surface age
  globally. Know there are surface  wind  patterns  caused  by  slow,
  sluggish surface winds moving sand and dust around.


    What surprises seen in planet as a whole?

    Saunders: impact crater morphology - appears very unmodified from
  oldest  to  youngest, for as much as 500-700My or more. Use craters
  for  determining  relative  ages  of  terrains  on  other   bodies.
  Expected  to  find  crater aging on Venus, but seems well preserved
  everywhere.


    Will we see new volcanic flows?

    Wood:  probably  not.  Timescale  too  short  even   for   active
  volcanoes.


    Evidence for continuous vs. catastrophic evolution?

    We  see  a  random  distribution of impact crater. Both sides use
  same  data.  Similar  crater  morphology,  5-6%  at  most   showing
  modification  from  volcanic  activity,  10% by tectonics. Enormous
  amounts  of  modification  by  plains  volcanic  activity.  Support
  resurfacing  over  large  regions  continually, OR very large event
  (duration up to 100My) covering entire planet,  followed  by  small
  amounts of modification.


    What further evidence to support one or the other?

    Sophisticated  development of statistical arguments, depending on
  detailed geologic arguments & mapping that haven't been  done  yet.
  Will take many scientist & student hours to develop evidence.


    Start/stop dates for 1/2/3 mapping cycles?

    Saunders:

    9/16/90 - start mapping 5/15/91 - end cycle 1 1/15/92 - end cycle
  2 cycle 3 will do left-side mapping - similar viewing geometries to
  cycle  1.  right  now  in  low-shade  geometries, don't get as much
  mapping time. Will get stereo & quantitative data.  9/15/92  -  end
  that phase. Could lower periapsis to 185 km & do gravity tracking -
  would get 360 degrees of tracking (geophysicists want this).


    Health of spacecraft & budget for cycle 3 & beyond?

    Saunders:  spacecraft  is  very  healthy,  no  problems. One tape
  recorder lost. Lost exciter for 1  X-Band  transmitter.  Would  not
  have  redundancy  if lost another, would lose radar mapping but not
  gravity. One reason to wait for thermally benvolent cycle 3  to  do
  more imaging. Plenty of hydrazine for any kind of manuever desired.
  120 kg initially, 100 kg left.

    Huntress  -  budgets  decided  on year-by-year basis. Came out in
  fairly good shape for '92. Plan to continue through 3rd cycle.  For
  FY '93, depends on OMB and Congress.


    Status of Pioneer Venus? Doing co-observations?

    Pettengill - orbiter will reenter in late '92. Very interested in
  revealed  variability  &  height  structure of atmosphere - may use
  drag to circularize Magellan orbit.


    If active volcanoes, will Magellan  see  it  in  real  time  like
  Voyager?

    Saunders:  radar  gives  a snapshot. Image once/8 months and look
  for changes - can't see  motion  directly.  Io  vulcanism  seen  in
  profile looking at planet limb, radar looks down.


    Shape  of  typical  ejecta  in terms of dipole length, reflective
  characteristics?  What  is  special  about  Magellan  that  allowed
  discovering Maat Mons?

    Wood:  Maat  Mons  is right at equator. Venera didn't go that far
  south. Pioneer had too low resolution to see it.

    Pettengill - might have seen from Earth-based radar, but geometry
  was poor.


    Galileo gives indirect evidence  for  lightning.  How  does  this
  correlate with Maat Mons being active?

    Saunders:  Galileo scientists don't feel there's any correlation.
  No link from scientific view.


    What would cause rapid weathering?

    Wood: weathering is chemical transformation. Igneous rock not  in
  equilibrium  after  it  cools.  Weathering  ->  change  in chemical
  character.  Erosion  ->  change  in   physical   character.   Speed
  exponentially  dependent  on  temperature,  Venus  is  very hot and
  atmosphere is reactive (SO2, high water  content  (~1/10  atm.  H20
  vapor pressure)). These tend to accelerate reactions.


    What does Magellan say about past existence of oceans on Venus?

    Saunders:  craters  indicate surface is unchanged for as far back
  as we can see. Smallest are ~3km -> size of  smallest  bodies  that
  can  get  through thick atmosphere -> suggests atmosphere unchanged
  for ~800My with greenhouse  at  900  degrees  F,  disallowing  open
  water.


    What is impact of budget pressures on new probes?

    Huntress:  CRAF  survived  FY '92 process, but allocated far less
  than requested, mandating delay in both CRAF (1 year)  and  Cassini
  (depending  on  FY '93) 1-2 years, with no effect on Saturn arrival
  date. Mars Observer on track for 9/92 launch, has operating budget.
  Magellan planned continuing operations. Galileo working on  getting
  antenna to unfold. CRAF penetrator deleted 1 year ago.

  --  Jon  Leech (leech@cs.unc.edu) __
  ``You looked  so  innocent  and  vulnerable,  I  wanted  to  use
  everything I knew about radar astronomy to protect you.''
  - Dr. Steve Mills in _My Stepmother is an Alien_