<NIS.NSF.NET> [IMR] IMR87-11.TXT
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 1]

 
 
 
~
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOVEMBER 1987
 
 
INTERNET MONTHLY REPORTS
------------------------
 
 
The purpose of these reports is to communicate to the Internet Research
Group the accomplishments, milestones reached, or problems discovered by
the participating organizations.
 
     This report is for research use only, and is not for public distri-
     bution.
 
Each organization is expected to submit a 1/2 page report on the first
business day of the month describing the previous month's activities.
These reports should be submitted via network mail to Ann Westine
(Westine@ISI.EDU) or Karen Roubicek (Roubicek@SH.CS.NET).
 
 
BBN LABORATORIES AND BBN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------
 
     WIDEBAND NETWORK
 
     BSAT Releases 6.1 and 6.2 were distributed to the Wideband Network
     sites this month.  These releases primarily consisted of minor bug
     fixes.  In addition, the operational BSAT software is now capable
     of supporting up to twelve Wideband sites.
 
     Work has started on the development of a faster and more reliable
     booting mechanism for the BSATs.  This mechanism will exploit the
     Butterfly "RAMFile" capability distributed with Chrysalis Operating
     System Release 3.0.  With the addition of non-volatile Multibus RAM
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 1]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     hardware to the BSAT, the RAMFile facility can be used to cache
     BSAT application and Chrysalis operating system software and
     critical BSAT state through complete system reboots, including
     reboots resulting from site power outages.  RAMFile-based booting
     is expected to reduce the required BSAT boot time from about 20
     minutes to less than one minute.
 
     SATNET
 
     The SATNET continues to perform well.  Roaring Creek, Tanum and
     Goonhilly had an availability of 99% from tests run at ISI.
     Fucino's availability was lower, 97%, due to a PSP outage early in
     the month which took the site off the air.
 
     The upgrade of the line between RSRE and UCL to 64 Kbps Kilostream
     service has been delayed.  We are still waiting for the line to be
     installed between the two sites by BT.  When a completion date for
     the installation of the line has been determined, we will
     reschedule the upgrade of the gateway hardware.
 
     INTERNET RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
 
     The EGP servers on the ARPANET were upgraded to DEC LSI 11/73's
     during November.  The results have been wonderful.  The ARPANET
     overall average round trip delay (for 1300-1700 EST on 11/24) as
     compared with a month earlier went from 1474msec to 442msec.  The
     average round trip delays to the IMP's with the EGP servers went
     from 9033msec to 413msec.
 
     The total internode throughput went from 379 Kbps to 468 Kbps.  For
     comparison, the 4-hour average is substantially greater than the
     413 kbps total internode throughput for the peak hour in a 5-
     working-day CUMstats collection in August.  At that time that was
     the largest throughput ever recorded for a single hour for the
     ARPANET.
 
     Another result of the upgrade was a dramatic reduction in the
     datagram drop rates of the ARPANET EGP servers and the DDN
     Mailbridges.  Note that AERO, MINET, and YUMA, which are the MILNET
     EGP servers have not been upgraded.  We hope to do this in
     December.
 
               AERO    MINET     YUMA     BBN2      ISI   PURDUE
     11/12    6.56%    4.48%    6.63%   12.33%   14.25%    7.84%
     11/13    0.90%    0.62%    5.06%    5.21%   12.81%    3.73%
     11/14    0.40%    0.13%    2.70%    2.34%    7.32%    3.65%
     11/15    0.25%    0.24%    2.61%    1.44%    5.95%    3.39%
     11/16    1.14%    0.90%    5.68%    3.53%   10.80%    2.73%
     11/17    1.50%    1.46%    8.96%    3.08%    9.32%    3.17%
     11/18    1.12%    0.54%   11.85%    4.23%    9.85%    2.79%
     11/19    1.78%    0.89%   11.01%    2.48%    5.97%    3.75%
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 2]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     11/20    3.55%    1.13%   12.39%    2.29%    3.34%    4.95%
     11/21    3.33%    0.42%    9.81%    0.75%    1.54%    0.92%
     11/22    2.65%    0.68%    7.78%    1.33%    1.37%    2.17%
     11/23    2.84%    0.86%   12.77%    1.42%    2.76%    2.93%
     11/24    4.28%    1.21%   12.99%    1.74%    2.21%    2.10%
     11/25    6.08%    1.39%   11.76%    1.56%    0.72%    1.45%
     11/26    4.05%    0.36%    5.37%    0.70%    0.49%    0.72%
 
 
             MILARP   MILBBN   MILDCE   MILISI   MILLBL   MILSAC   MILSRI
     11/12   20.04%   11.56%    7.89%   14.47%    3.01%    5.25%   6.50%
     11/13   16.30%   11.22%    5.66%   22.20%    1.08%    5.10%   6.90%
     11/14   12.80%    5.48%    2.34%   13.15%    7.36%    1.97%   1.45%
     11/15   14.21%    4.46%    2.05%    9.00%   12.10%    2.37%   1.21%
     11/16   23.58%   12.88%    9.08%   15.60%    1.67%    3.97%   4.92%
     11/17   26.62%   11.59%    5.01%   12.34%    1.42%    6.09%   3.65%
     11/18   28.24%   13.63%    7.04%   13.01%    1.97%    3.25%   4.10%
     11/19   18.34%    8.23%    6.63%    6.33%    1.32%    1.71%   3.88%
     11/20    4.97%    7.31%    9.50%    6.34%    0.27%    2.08%   6.03%
     11/21    2.51%    1.74%    3.98%    0.68%    0.27%    1.00%   0.50%
     11/22    1.78%    1.36%    1.91%    0.31%    0.20%    0.79%   0.40%
     11/23    9.29%    4.57%    5.06%    1.02%    0.95%    3.23%   3.18%
     11/24    8.94%    4.69%    2.99%    3.00%    0.58%    3.65%   1.44%
     11/25    9.44%    3.25%    3.08%    2.57%    0.75%    4.08%   1.85%
     11/26    4.99%    1.94%    2.99%    1.53%    0.94%    1.10%   0.57%
 
     Many thanks to Mike Petry at UMD who supplied two of the DEC LSI-
     11/73.
 
     Robert Hinden (Hinden@PARK-STREET.BBN.COM)
 
 
ISI
---
 
     Internet Concepts Project
 
          The Intermail mail forwarding system was moved from C.ISI.EDU
          to A.ISI.EDU.  Although there were some interruptions in
          service due to hardware and software problems, Intermail
          appears to be running reliably once again.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 3]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
          Seven RFCs were published this month.
 
          RFC 1028:  Davin, J., J. Case, M. Fedor, and M. Schoffstall,
                     "A SIMPLE GATEWAY MONITORING PROTOCOL",
                     November 1987.
 
          RFC 1030:  Lambert, M., "ON TESTING THE NETBLT PROTOCOL OVER
                     DIVERS NETWORKS", November 1987.
 
          RFC 1031:  Lazear, W., "MILNET NAME DOMAIN TRANSITION",
                     November 1987.
 
          RFC 1032:  Stahl, M., "DOMAIN ADMINISTRATORS GUIDE",
                     November 1987.
 
          RFC 1033:  Lotter, M., "DOMAIN ADMINISTRATORS OPERATIONS
                     GUIDE", November 1987.
 
          RFC 1034:  Mockapetris, P., "DOMAIN NAMES - CONCEPTS AND
                     FACILITIES", November 1987.
 
          RFC 1035:  Mockapetris, P., "DOMAIN NAMES - IMPLEMENTATION
                     AND SPECIFICATION", November 1987.
 
          Ann Westine (Westine@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     Multimedia Conferencing Project
 
          The ISIC machine is fading from existence, so our "WBCTST"
          hourly probing of the Wideband Net and SATNET has been moved
          to ISIA.  Since ISIA is not directly connected to the ARPANET,
          the extra gateway hop may decrease the probe success rate
          some.  After ISI-GATEWAY was upgraded to an 11/73, though, any
          decrease seems slight.
 
          Steve Casner attended the Telecon VIII conference in Anaheim,
          CA, Nov. 10th, and saw the Concept Communications video codec
          in operation.  Steve got positive answers to technical
          questions about interfacing this codec into our system for
          packet video.  Steve is proceeding with the purchase of these
          codecs to replace the experimental codecs built at ISI for use
          in multimedia conferencing.  This will allow us to expand from
          two packet video sites to four over the next several months.
 
          Steve Casner (Casner@ISI.EDU)
 
          Brian Hung is looking at implementing echo cancellors for the
          Multimedia Teleconferencing using the NEC PD7720 Signal
          Processing Interface.  Right now he is reading a number of
          papers in order to come up with an algorithm to be implemented
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 4]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
          on the NEC PD7720 chip.
 
          Brian Hung (Hung@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     NSFNET Project
 
          Bob Braden and Annette DeSchon continued working on the
          statistics collection programs for the NSFNET.  Bob Braden
          attended the Network Program Advisory Group meeting at NSF,
          11-13 November.  Annette DeSchon attended the IAB Autonomous
          Networks Task Force meeting at MIT in Boston, 4-6 November.
 
          Annette DeSchon and Bob Braden (DeSchon@ISI.EDU and
          Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
     Supercomputer and Workstation Communication Project
 
          Alan Katz wrote a few more utilities for GNU Emacs.  Alan also
          has been investigating the possibility of making GNU Emacs a
          split-editor (with part of it running on a remote machine and
          part locally) in order to do performance experiments over the
          Wideband net.  This would be helpful in determining how to
          best split a distributed editor and also to discover how
          tolerable using an editor over the Wideband net can be made.
          GNU Emacs might be very nice for this since it is very modular
          and is also very easy to customize.
 
          Alan has been investigating further issues in equations
          representation.
 
          Alan Katz (Katz@ISI.EDU)
 
 
MIT-LCS
-------
 
     No report received.
 
 
MITRE Corporation
-----------------
 
     No report received.
 
 
NTA & NDRE
----------
 
     No report received.
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 5]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
SRI
---
 
     No report received.
 
 
UCL
---
 
     Research:
 
     Work in the Admiral project is continuing using the formal
     specification languages Z and CSP, to design an N-Reliable
     Multicast protocol based on Birmans ?CAST primatives, together with
     a robust Group management scheme, based on Deering and Cheriton`s
     work at Stanford.
 
     Some initial performance figures for Remote Operations (ROS) over
     our full ISO stack (ISODE over X.25, or TP0/TCP) show it to be an
     order of magnitude slower than existing RPC systems for
     Request/Response type activity.  Some of this overhead is for
     philospical acceptable reasons. We are investigating where the rest
     of the time is going.
 
     Infrastructure:
 
     The "UK Triangle" upgrade to 64kbps all round is in hand.  UCL now
     have a second ethernet on our SATNET Butterfly, which has helped
     simplify our access control.
 
     We are now running Bind 4.7.3+ a bit for Domain Name Service, and
     should hopefully see better logical availability.
 
     John Crowcroft  (jon@CS.UCL.AC.UK)
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
----------------------
 
 
     1.   The massive disruptions of the NSFNET community previously
          reported have abated further during the month. Persistent
          observation, review of NSFNET Backbone logs and pursuit of zoo
          events turned up several specific areas in which stability was
          improved by further tuning of the Backbone fuzzballs.
          However, X.25 ARPANET access paths continue to suffer
          occasional disruptions due to congestion of virtual-circuit
          resources.
 
     2.   One of the Backfuzz improvements involved the mechanism used
          to measure baseline delays between nodes. Even though the
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 6]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
          mechanism is not traffic sensitive, it had become degraded due
          to link-level retransmissions caused by noisy circuits,
          humungus routing updates and massive overloads.  The mechanism
          was modified to use pre-engineered delays on the most
          congested paths. Further improvements in stability may be
          possible upon close examination of the local routing
          environment at each Backbone site.
 
     3.   The "floating default" routing mechanism mentioned last month
          has now been implemented throughout the hellospeaking world of
          the Backbone and its dependencies. However, not all ARPANET
          gateways that could help drain the swamp are actually doing
          that, with the result that some paths continue to suffer
          severe congestion.
 
     4.   During the month several instances of fuzzbusters, defined
          here as bogon routing packets, occured where local routing
          packets (both RIPspeak and hellospeak) somehow escaped their
          local nets, wandered around the Internet and wound up on
          another local net. All fuzzballs, including the NSFNET
          Backbone machines, were modified to include fuzzbuster
          detectors (illegal in Virginia) which destroy these things on
          contact; however, the original points of escape have yet to be
          found.
 
     5.   Investigation and experiment on Internet congestion control
          continues. An analysis of the various logs showed a dramatic
          instance where a Big Blue machine (which presumably did not
          respond to ICMP Source Quench), drenched a Backbone machine,
          while a Craymonster (which did), didn't even get it wet. The
          incident suggests that the mechanisms prototyped in the
          fuzzball and some hosts really can produce worthwhile
          improvements in system utilization and service.
 
     6.   Development continues on the Dissimilar Gateway Protocol
          (DGP). Mike Little and Woody Woodburn have produced a draft
          specification, which is circulating now for review. The next
          task is testing the prototype in a controlled environment and
          later in the real Internet.
 
     7.   Dave Mills attended the NSF NPAG meeting in Washington.
          Planning continues for the INARC Workshop, to be held at BBN
          on 17-18 December. See the INARC report elsewhere for further
          information.
 
          Dave Mills (Mills@HUEY.UDEL)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 7]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
NSF NETWORKING
--------------
 
     NSF NETWORKING
 
     UCAR/BBN LABS NSF NETWORK SERVICE CENTER (NNSC)
 
     We completed and started distributing the second issue of the NSF
     Network News.  To request additional copies, please send a message
     to <nnsc@nnsc.nsf.net>.
 
     Craig Partridge attended the Internet Engineering Task Force
     meeting in Boulder and Karen Roubicek attended the meeting of the
     Federation of American Research Networks in Pittsburgh.
 
     Karen Roubicek (roubicek@nnsc.nsf.net)
 
     NSFNET BACKBONE SITES
 
     CORNELL UNIVERSITY THEORY CENTER
 
     No report received.
 
     UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
 
     Received first loads of P4200 version 7.4 and it didn't load.
     There are two important reasons this version is of merit.  One is
     the subnet routing problem.  The other is that in looking at metric
     reconstruction as suggested by STRWG it appears virtually
     impossible without 7.4's split horizon.
 
     Line to Minnesota Research Network is due 5 Dec as well as our link
     to IMP 94.  Connection of note is that MRN will also be closely
     connected to IMP94.  Link to UIUC will be via P4200s.
 
     by Ed Krol (krol@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu)
 
     JOHN VON NEUMANN NATIONAL SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER
 
     This report is designed to inform the JVNC Consortium and JVNCnet
     network members as well as the Internet community of monthly status
     of the JVNCnet network.  For a copy of the full report, send mail
     to "JVNCnet-nic@jvnca.csc.org".
 
     The gateways were available an average of 94.29 % of the time.
     There were many outages this month due to mostly hardware problems
     on the VAXs, T1 mux problems and routing problems with the UB
     routers, some of these required time to be fixed since some sites
     don't have 24 hours coverage.  Still, the percentage of
     availability has been high, and overall performance of the network
     has been good.
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 8]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     Due to congestion on the NSFNet backbone we diverted traffic
     between Penn State and NCAR via JVNCnet and University of Colorado
     (a backdoor path), allowing users at Penn State to access NCAR more
     reliably.
 
     Plans are on their way to bring up the new extension of the JVNCnet
     network in the North East.  This extension includes: Yale
     University Wesleyan University, Dartmouth College, Boston
     University, Northeastern University, and University of
     Massachussets (Amherst).  The schedule for bringing these six new
     sites is January 1988.  These sites will connect at Harvard, Brown
     and JVNC making two double rings, and will be combination of T1 and
     56kbps lines (being the T1 the existing circuits).
 
     INFORMATION:
 
     JVNCnet NOC:            "net@jvnca.csc.org"
     (JVNCnet Network Operations Center)
 
     JVNCnet NIC:            "JVNCnet-nic@jvnca.csc.org"
     (JVNCnet information)
 
     * CSC Consortium: Princeton University, MIT, Harvard, Brown,
     University of Pennsylvania, Rutgers, IAS, Columbia, University of
     Rochester, NYU, Penn State, University of Arizona, University of
     Colorado.
 
     ** NRAC (Newark Remote Access): New Jersey Institute of Technology
     (NJIT), Stevens Institute of Technology, University of Medicine and
     Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ).
 
     by Sergio Heker (heker@jvnca.csc.org)
 
     NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH AND UNIVERSITY SATELLITE
     NETWORK PROJECT
 
     The connection of NRL (Naval Research Laboratory) in Washington,
     D.C.  to the USAN Satellite network is complete. Most of the Bit
     Error Rate Tests are completed.
 
     The 56 Kbps land line, the cisco routers, and DSU/CSUs for the
     SESQUINET connection to USAN is in place. Hookup and testing is
     expected to be complete by December 9. The connection will be to an
     existing cisco router that also services the USAN connection to the
     University of Colorado. This connection will give SESQUINET access
     to NSFNET since an NSFNET node is connected to USAN.  The addition
     of SESQUINET will bring to eleven the number of gateways on USAN.
 
     by Don Morris (morris@scdsw1.ucar.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 9]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     PITTSBURGH SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER
 
     The PSC Fuzzball continued to perform well during November despite
     many changes to software.  A concern was the "flapping routes"
     throughout the month, especially to the other backbone nets and
     other critical nets.
 
     Problems with virtual circuit limitations using ACC's X.25
     interface to the PSN and BBN's move to a new software revision for
     the PSN's have caused numerous headaches on PSC-GW, but with
     reconfigurations of the net and advertising some NSF networks at
     other ARPANET gateways the situation has stabilized.  New versions
     of software and firmware for the ACC board will be installed soon.
     These will not fix the virtual circuit limitation problem.  New
     gated versions and configurations have been installed throughout
     the month.  PSC-GW forwarded about 800,000 packets per day between
     the ARPANET and NSFnet.
 
     The installation of the satellite dish for PSN #21 here has been
     completed and tests are being run.  We have had a line installed to
     the CMU PSN which we are willing to use pending action by DCA.  We
     have received approval to connect another gateway machine to the
     PSN here.  The new gateway machine has been built and is running
     the newest ACC code soon to be installed on PSC-GW.
 
     The T1 local loop connecting us to the Litel Point of Presence in
     Pittsburgh has been installed in preparation for connecting the
     western sites of PSCnet.  We will install a Proteon gateway at
     Litel's Cleveland POP early in December and as soon as local loops
     are completed the rest of PSCnet will be installed.
 
     Another gateway machine has been built to provide better access for
     our CMU users to our center and the NSFnet.  A gated configuration
     for this machine is being coordinated with the NSF NOC.
 
     by David O'Leary (oleary@morgul.psc.edu)
 
     SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER
 
     Our PSN's first trunk line (to USC/ISI), installed on 29 Oct., was
     tested this month from here to LA.  At last report, however, it was
     still 150 ft. short of the ISI PSN.  The second line to UCLA,
     service date 4 Dec, is not yet in sight.
 
     We are still awaiting 7.4 for our Proteon p4200.
 
     We have had no change in our line configuration this past month.
 
     by Paul Love (loveep@sds.sdsc.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 10]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     NSFNET REGIONAL AFFILIATED & CONSORTIUM NETWORKS
 
     BARRNET
 
     BARRNET is operating with reasonable stability of T-1 clear
     channels, although there is agreement that the telcos need better
     understanding of sensitivity of non-muxed T-1 channels to the
     service operations they employ for muxed T-1.  Release 7.4 of the
     Proteon gateway software has been stable at NASA-Ames for over a
     month now.  This version is reportedly 30% faster than release 7.3.
     Milo Medin has configured the Ames gateways to use "static routes
     with override", using an initial RIP hop count of 16 (infinity) and
     then letting RIP dynamically determine which routes are really
     usable.  This allows some administrative control over routing
     information while still allowing routes to be dynamically marked as
     up or down.  There is consensus that it is desirable to have all
     BARRNet gateways (routers) run the same configuration.
 
     BARRNET's policy and objectives are to achieve maximum
     connectivity/reachability at the earliest possible time without
     breaking things.  Routing continues to be a problem until the
     "global" routing metrics are fixed, amongst many other things.
     Currently most delicate is advertising of routes into BARRNET from
     other networks through the SDSC gateway and advertising of routes
     to BARRNET from networks other than those selected.  The immediate
     objective is to advertise to BARRNet from SDSC the networks at the
     5 backbone connected supercomputer centers plus the networks at
     UCSD and UCSB.  The SDSC gateway will munge RIP metrics to
     advertise 1 hop reachability to/from BARRNet and the SCCs.  The
     expanded reachability routing issues (e.g., advertising BARRNet
     routes outside of the SCCs) will be discussed with NSFNET gurus.
     For the present, the advertising of these routes must be limited.
 
     The BARRNET consortium is now developing its policies for
     additional membership.  About 10 organizations have inquired;
     government labs, educational institutions and profit sector
     companies.  Early additional connectivity is expected to LLNL, LBL
     and SLAC.
 
     by Bill Yundt (GD.WHY@forsythe.stanford.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 11]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     JVNCNET (Refer to JVNNSC backbone report)
 
     MERIT (No report received)
 
     MIDNET (No report received)
 
     MINNESOTA REGIONAL NET (MRNet)
 
     Minnesota Regional Net (MRNet) is waiting on AT&T to install its
     trunk to NCSA, due December 5th. Proteon P4200 is here. MRNet
     bylaws approved by charter members. Gated work going on on current
     ARPANET gateway VAX to allow support for NSFnet, ARPANET and MRNet
     routing. MRNet technical meetings working on security problems for
     Cray, ETA, etc. Looks like mail only to them.
 
     by Thomas Jacobson (thomas@umn-rei-uc.ARPA)
 
     NCSANET
 
     NCSA and the University of Illinois Chicago campus will be
     installing a T1 line to be up by January 1, 1988.  The UI-C will
     serve as a Chicago area hub, allowing area institutions to share T1
     access to NCSA and the NSFnet Backbone.
 
     A recent meeting was held to discuss issues such as network
     operations and support as well as to discuss the various possible
     choices for routers.  It was generally agreed that a non-vendor
     specific hub would be best, allowing institutions to connect to the
     hub with existing equipment.  Seven Chicago area institutions were
     represented at this meeting.
 
     by Charlie Catlett (catlett@ncsa.ncsa.uiuc.edu)
 
     NORTHWESTNET (No report received)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 12]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     NYSERNET
 
     As of 5 December 1987, NYSERNet had the following topology:
 
                               Clarkson
                  Syracuse--+  |
                            |  |
          Rochester--------Cornell---------RPI---Albany
             |               ||             |
          Buffalo...Fredonia ||             |
             |  ....Oswego   ||             |
             |               ||             |
          Binghamton         ||   +-------- | ------StonyBrook
             |               ||   |         |
             |               ||   |         |
          CUNY--NYTEL/NSMAC--Columbia======NYU-+
          |  |\     |        |     |       /|  |
          |  | \  NYTEL/GC   | NYNEX/S&T  / |  |
          |  |  \            BNL         /  |  |
          |  |   \                      /   |  |
          |  |    +-------------Rockefeller |  |
          |  |                              |  |
          |  +------------------------------+  |
          |                                    |
          +-------------POLY-------------------+
 
               ||
          ==== || T1
               ||
 
         \ | /   56kbits
 
          ....    9.6kbits
 
     The Cornell Columbia/link was upgraded from 56kbits to T1.
 
     by Marty Schoffstall (schoff@nisc.nyser.net)
 
     SDSCNET (Refer to SDSC backbone report)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 13]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     SESQUINET
 
     The complete initially proposed SesquiNet configuration has been
     operational now for four months.  The following campus networks are
     being served, and are advertised via EGP to the core:
 
             Baylor College of Medicine      128.249
             Houston Area Research Center    192.31.87
             Rice University                 128.42
             Texas A&M University            128.194
             Texas Southern University       192.31.101
             and the University of Houston   129.7
 
     During the last month, we have actually experienced one gateway
     hardware failure and one gateway software failure that effected UH
     and TAMU, respectively.
 
     We have now done some analysis of the reliability of the network,
     based on logs written by our monitoring program.  For each of the
     sites listed below, we note the number of (unscheduled) failures
     and the percent of availability (percentage of time the site was
     up, deducting scheduled down time).
 
             --------------------------------
             Site    Failures     Available
             --------------------------------
             BCM         0         100.0 %
             HARC        5          90.3 %
             RU          0          99.8 %
             TAMU        2          99.9 %
             TSU         2         100.0 %
             UH          2          99.3 %
             --------------------------------
 
     While some of the problems were due to leased lines and two gateway
     failures, most of the unscheduled downtime was due to machine room
     power problems.
 
     The phone line from NSFnet/NCAR to SesquiNet/Rice has been
     completed, and I am working closely with David Wood of WestNet to
     put it online using the SesquiNet/cisco router at Rice and the
     WestNet/cisco router at NCAR.  When operational, this link will
     advertise SesquiNet to NSFnet, and will technically allow us to
     advertise SesquiNet to USAN and to the NASA Science Network.
 
     by Guy Almes (almes@rice.edu)
 
     SURANET (No report received)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 14]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     WESTNET
 
 
     1.   A technical workshop was held at the University of Colorado at
          Boulder from November 9 to 11, 1987. There were attendees from
          14 campuses and New Mexico Technet. The first day and one half
          covered general topics, while the last day was spent on the
          cisco hardware. The wokshop was very well received by all
          attendees.
 
     2.   Installation of the cisco gateways has been completed at the
          University of New Mexico and the University of Wyoming. New
          Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and New Mexico State
          University are in the process of being connected.
 
     3.   The circuit from New Mexico Technet to NCAR is in the process
          of being ordered. Installation is scheduld for February 1988.
 
     4.   A request for bids is being prepared for all remaining
          circuits for Westnet.  Installation of these additional
          circuits is scheduled for March 1, 1988.
 
     5.   All hardware for Westnet has been ordered, except for the
          spares, which are planned to be ordered in January 1988.
 
     6.   We are preparing a mini-proposal to submit to NSF to connect
          Brigham Young University and the University of Utah into
          Westnet. As the circuit to Utah State University already
          passes through Salt Lake City, the costs involved are minimal.
 
          by Pat Burns (pburns%csugreen.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU)
 
 
TASK FORCE REPORTS
------------------
 
 
     APPLICATIONS -- USER INTERFACE
 
          No report received.
 
 
     AUTONOMOUS NETWORKS
 
          The Autonomous Networks Task Force met in Boston, Nov. 5-6 at
          MIT. Minutes will be available soon. A brief summary of our
          discussion will be provided in a future Internet monthly
          report.
 
          Deborah Estrin (Estrin@OBERON.USC.EDU)
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 15]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     END-TO-END SERVICES
 
          The End-to-End Task Force held a meeting at the MIT Endicott
          House on October 22-23.
 
          Host-Group Multicasting
 
          The task force chose a target date of July 1988 for moving the
          IP multicasting spec (RFC966, RFC988) to a proposed Internet
          standard.  First, however, the Task Force must consider some
          changes which Steve Deering has proposed to the IGMP protocol.
          These changes would eliminate the Create Group, Join Group,
          and Leave Group operations, in favor of a mechanism based upon
          periodic status messages the agent and upon the agents
          "defending" names in use.
 
          The lack of progress towards development of applications using
          IP multicasting is a disappointment; we hope that moving the
          protocol towards an Internet standard will encourage its use.
 
          Transaction Protocols
 
          Jim Stevens of Rockwell described his Transaction Transport
          Protocol TTP, developed for the SURAN effort.  TTP, like the
          ESP protocol developed at UCL, does not have a strict
          request/response model, but provides a full-duplex message
          stream with caching of state information at each end and
          timeouts to achieve the "connectionless" and minimal-packet
          properties.  The protocol is being implemented at SRI as part
          of SURAN; it is not known whether this will result in any
          useful product for research in protocols.
 
          One of the major unsolved problems in transaction protocols is
          how to do flow control without connection setup.  It was
          suggested that the slow-start algorithm of Van Jacobson might
          be a very good solution.  Unfortunately, there are no early
          prospects for experiments to try out this idea.
 
          Performance
 
          As always, Van Jacobson stimulated an interesting discussion.
          He has developed plausible general arguments to show that a
          stable windowing algorithm must necessarily involve
          exponential decrease of traffic but linear increase.  The
          argument is based upon the solutions to the first-order
          difference equation governing a window-based transport
          protocol over IP.  Similar arguments lead to the conclusion
          that rate-based protocols are potentially unstable.
 
          There was some consideration of whether Van's TCP ideas could
          be applied to dynamic selection of NETBLT parameters.  Dave
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 16]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
          Clark felt that by the time slow-start had found an operating
          point for the Wideband net, the entire transfer would be over.
          He plans to work in a different direction, to negotiate with
          gateways to set up a bandwidth reservation in which NETBLT can
          work efficiently.
 
          Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     INTERNET ARCHITECTURE
 
          Twenty-three requests have been received so far to attend the
          INARC Workshop on 17-18 December at BBN in Cambridge, MA. The
          theme of the workshop is the next-generation internet, where
          we all get to second-guess the Internet architects and build
          the next one.  Since space may be limited, others wishing to
          attend the bash are invited to send without delay a one-
          paragraph summary of their favorite agenda topic to:
 
                  David L. Mills
                  Electrical Engineering Department
                  University of Delaware
                  Newark, DE 19716
                  (302) 451-6534 or 737-9211
                  ARPAbox: mills@udel.edu
 
          Dave Mills (Mills@HUEY.UDEL.EDU)
 
 
     INTERNET ENGINEERING
 
          No report received.
 
 
     INTERNET MANAGEMENT
 
          Phill Gross and Vint Cerf have met twice and will meet once
          more in December to finalize the task force report. Phill is
          also working on a larger report for Mitre into which much of
          the result of the task force will go. That report will go to
          DCA which sponsored the internet planning effort at Mitre.
 
          Vint Cerf (Cerf@A.ISI.EDU)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 17]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
     PRIVACY
 
          The IAB Privacy Task Force had a productive two-day meeting at
          BBN Communications Corporation in Cambridge, Massachusetts on
          4 and 5 November.  Attendees were: David Balenson, Curt
          Barker, Matt Bishop, Morrie Gasser, Steve Kent, John Linn, Dan
          Nessett, Mike Padlipsky, and Steve Wilbur.
 
          A provisional revised version of RFC989 was presented,
          including several changes and clarifications relative to the
          released version, and a number of issues were discussed.
          Authentication/integrity processing will always be applied to
          the entirety of a message, even when encryption is applied
          selectively.  It was provisionally resolved that the CCITT
          certificate format will be used to define a public-key
          certificate's constituent parts.  The relation between SMTP
          addresses and X.400 O/R names is under investigation.  We
          carried out an extended discussion of alternative integrity
          approaches, in search for a replacement for a single MAC
          encrypted for each recipient, which Chris Mitchell's papers
          had identified as inadequate for the multi-recipient case.  A
          per-recipient header parameter will specify an independent
          choice of message integrity check (MIC) algorithm for each
          recipient.  One option will be the "ambidextrous MAC"
          LMAC/RMAC algorithm, computing two MACs: one computed in the
          conventional manner from left to right and one computed from
          right to left by reversing the order of the 8-octet blocks
          comprising the message.  The key used for these computations
          will be a variant of the key used for data encryption.
 
          We discussed the scope of a future RFC to follow and
          complement RFC989 by defining the key management
          infrastructure to support privacy-enhanced mail transmission,
          and reviewed the state of implementation activities.
          Subsequent to the meeting, updated documentation was provided
          to Deborah Estrin of USC to support her organization's
          proposed work in this area, and meeting minutes were
          distributed to the membership.
 
          Several topics distinct from RFC989 were also discussed.  We
          are checking on licensing issues relevant to use of the RSA
          algorithm.  Correspondence from RSA Data Security, Inc. on
          this issue was received in response to inquiries after the
          meeting.  We heard a presentation on the British Telecom
          proposal to CCITT for X.400 electronic mail security.  We
          discussed the Internet Engineering Task Force's concerns about
          authentication and privacy issues relevant to gateways and
          monitoring centers.  Several messages have been exchanged on
          this topic, and a follow-up meeting with IETF representatives
          is anticipated.
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 18]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1987
 
 
          The next Privacy Task Force meeting is tentatively scheduled
          for Wednesday and Thursday, 2-3 March 1988, to be hosted by
          Dan Nessett at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
 
          John Linn (Linn@CCY.BBN.COM)
 
 
     ROBUSTNESS AND SURVIVABILITY
 
          No report received.
 
 
     SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
 
          Nothing to report this month.
 
          Barry Leiner (Leiner@ICARUS.RIACS.EDU)
 
 
     SECURITY
 
          No report received.
 
 
     TACTICAL INTERNET
 
          No report received.
 
 
     TESTING AND EVALUATION
 
          No report received.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 19]