<NIS.NSF.NET> [IMR] IMR87-12.TXT
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 1]

 
 
 
~
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DECEMBER 1987
 
 
INTERNET MONTHLY REPORTS
------------------------
 
 
The purpose of these reports is to communicate to the Internet Research
Group the accomplishments, milestones reached, or problems discovered by
the participating organizations.
 
     This report is for research use only, and is not for public
     distribution.
 
Each organization is expected to submit a 1/2 page report on the first
business day of the month describing the previous month's activities.
These reports should be submitted via network mail to Ann Westine
(Westine@ISI.EDU) or Karen Roubicek (Roubicek@NNSC.NSF.NET).
 
 
BBN LABORATORIES AND BBN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------
 
     WIDEBAND NETWORK
 
     Connectivity was established between a Wideband Butterfly Gateway
     installed at the Naval Ocean Systems Center and the BSAT packet
     switch located at M/A-COM Government Systems, Inc.  These two San
     Diego, CA sites are connected via a T1-rate terrestrial
     communication circuit.  Difficulties with the installation of this
     circuit had delayed the establishment of the NOSC-Wideband
     connection, which can now provide Internet access for hosts to be
     installed on a NOSC Ethernet.
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 1]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     The Wideband Network supported a multi-site demonstration of the
     Cronus Distributed Operating System which was presented at the Rome
     Air Development Center on December 9.  Wide area communication
     through the Wideband network was a prominent part of the
     presentation, which was given as part a RADC Technology Exchange
     meeting.
 
     BSAT Release 6.3 was distributed to the Wideband Network sites this
     month.  This release increases the number of requests for future
     satellite channel capacity that can be sent within a single
     satellite channel burst.  It also removes a previously existing
     limitation on the number of static multicast group members that can
     be interfaced to a given BSAT.
 
     SATNET
 
     Although the SATNET performance was generally good, there were two
     major problems in the month of December.  The Goonhilly SIMP began
     adversely affecting both satellite channels causing a loss of
     connectivity with Europe.  The PSP terminal was reset and a tripped
     breaker was restored.  We also experienced high error rates on the
     phone line to DCEC.  Because of a misunderstanding, the local phone
     company began working on the line to CSS.  This resulted in
     periodic losses of connectivity to the Arpanet.  Service was
     restored to CSS and the problem with the line to DCEC was resolved.
     Even with these problems, the availability of the channel still
     averaged 98% from tests run by ISI.
 
     A patch has been tested in the SATNET testbed which approximately
     doubles the throughput on the two satellite channels.  The tests
     were made with the SIMP message generator and will be verified in
     the operational SATNET.  There still appears to be a throughput
     bottle neck at the host interface of the SIMP, progress is being
     made to eliminate it as well.  We plan to distribute software with
     the new channel code at the SATNET meeting in January.
 
     INTERNET RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
 
     During December we tested a patch for the LSI-11 Gateways to allow
     them to send more datagrams into the Arpanet by using a different
     handling type in the 1822 AHIP message when the RFNM limit (8) was
     reached.  This had the hoped for result of greatly reducing the
     number datagrams dropped by the gateways, in some cases by two
     orders of magnitude!
 
     It had the unexpected result (in the Arpanet under the New End-End
     protocol) for X.25 hosts of causing the PSN's to multiple identical
     (from the hosts point of view) X.25 virtual circuits to be opened
     to the hosts.  This caused problems for some X.25 hosts which were
     not prepared to accept duplicate virtual circuits.
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 2]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     We believe the patch results in a very significant improvement to
     overall Internet performance and we would like to see it installed
     in the LSI-11 gateways, a patch written for the Butterfly Gateways,
     and similar changes be made to all gateways.  We think it is worth
     while the for X.25 hosts to change to be able accept multiple
     virtual circuits.  Overall service would be much improved.  Please
     send me your comments (hinden@bbn.com).
 
     Bob Hinden (Hinden@BBN.COM)
 
 
ISI
---
 
     Internet Concepts Project
 
          Jon Postel and Paul Mockapetris attended the 2nd TCP/IP
          Interoperability conference in Crystal City, VA., Dec 1-4.
          Paul organized a session on Domain Practices.  Paul
          Mockapetris visited BBN Dec 17-18 to attend the Internet
          Architecture Task Force meeting.  Paul distributed a new
          version of root nameserver to TOPS-20 sites, to implement
          distribution of SOAs for negative caching and to fix problem
          related to distribution of address information for root
          servers.
 
          Two RFCs were published this month.
 
          RFC 1036:  Horton, M., and R. Adams, "Standard for Interchange
                     of USENET Messages, December 1987.
 
          RFC 1037:  Greenburg, B., and S. Keene, "NFILE - A File Access
                     Protocol, December 1987.
 
          Ann Westine (Westine@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     Multimedia Conferencing Project
 
          We are still awaiting delivery of the Concept Communications
          IMAGE 30 video codec.  In the meantime, we are planning out
          the necessary changes to the packet video software required to
          accommodate the new codec, and implementing those which can be
          applied to the current experimental codec as well.
 
          Steve Casner (Casner@ISI.EDU)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 3]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
          Brian Hung is working on an assembly language program for the
          NEC uPD7720 signal processing chip to implement echo
          cancelling function.  The purpose of this is to eliminate the
          echos generated at the local 4-to-2 wire telephone hybrid.
 
          Brian Hung (Hung@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     NSFNET Project
 
          Bob Braden and Annette DeSchon completed the first release of
          the NSFNET statistics gathering package NNStat. A beta-test
          version of the acquisition program statspy was first installed
          on a Sun at Michigan by Hans-Werner Braun, so we could verify
          the ability to collect data from it remotely.  Word of the
          program spread rapidly, and a number of sites requested the
          first release.  We set up a mailing list of interested people,
          which now numbers over a dozen.  We have been kept busy fixing
          bugs and enhancing the capabilities of the package.  This
          resulted in a second release on December 31, and another
          scheduled for early next month.
 
          Bob Braden attended the Second TCP/IP Interoperability
          Workshop in Crystal City, Virginia, chaired a session on
          higher-level protocols, and gave a talk entitled "Internet
          End-to-End Protocols -- Progress and Prospects".
 
          Bob Braden worked on a joint document with Bob Cooper, Peter
          Kirstein, and Roland Rosner of the UK, proposing to link the
          academic networks in the US and the UK.  In particular, the
          proposal will lease a 64kbit transatlantic circuit linking
          NSFNET in the US to JANET, the UK academic X.25 network.  This
          circuit is to carry IP encapsulated in X.25.  At the UK end,
          there will be a MicroVax running a clone of the UCL
          application-level gateway; that is, it will relay between SMTP
          and Grey-Book mail, between FTP and NIFTP/FTAM file transfers,
          and between Telnet and XXX terminal service.  The plan is to
          connect to JANET at the University of London Computer Center
          and to NSFNET at JVNC.
 
          Bob Braden & Annette DeSchon (DeSchon@ISI.EDU, Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     Supercomputer and Workstation Communication Project
 
          Alan Katz continued working on using GNU Emacs as a split
          editor.  Most, if not all of the functions to do this are
          being written in GNU Emacs Lisp.
 
          Alan Katz (Katz@ISI.EDU)
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 4]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
          During December, the packet-echoing and packet-dropping
          feature of PVP was tested for correctness in a three-way (i.e.
          more than two-way) connection.  During testing, a new mode of
          packet-disordering was discovered in the Wideband network.  In
          an effort to investigate this, an unrelated bug was found in
          PVP having to do with passing virtual address pointers between
          nodes.
 
          D.J. Walden (Walden@ISI.EDU)
 
 
MIT-LCS
-------
 
     No internet related progress to report.
 
     Lixia Zhang (Lixia@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU)
 
 
MITRE Corporation
-----------------
 
     Nothing to report this month.
 
     Ann Whitaker (Whitaker@Gateway.Mitre.Org)
 
 
SRI
---
 
     Internet Research
 
     I attended IETF Open Routing Working Group meeting on December 3-4,
     at Proteon, Inc., Westborough, Mass.  The Meeting was devoted to
     the continuing preparation of the document "Requirements for
     Inter-Autonomous Systems Routing".
 
     Zaw-Sing Su <zsu@tsca.istc.sri.com>
 
 
UCL
---
 
     UCL is involved in a number of OSI acitivities.  These are seen as
     an important indirect component of the DARPA activity, and are
     reported at intervals.   This is a summary of the ongoing activity.
 
     There is ongoing work to develop an OSI infrastructure at UCL.
     This means provision of OSI communication protocols and tools to
     facilitate development of OSI applications.  It is hoped that
     during 1988, these experimental systems will be used as a basis for
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 5]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     pilot OSI services and for research into OSI applications.
 
     Most work has been on the ISODE package, developed by M.T. Rose and
     D.E.  Cass at Northrop Research and Technology Center.  UCL acts as
     the European distribution point for this package.  The basic OSI
     services are support of the Transport and Session layers.  The
     ISODE package was implemented with Transport class 0 over TCP/IP,
     and work at UCL has extended this to operate over X.25.  A
     particular problem has been to provide a fully asynchronous OSI
     application interface over synchronous X.25 interfaces.  The
     disadvantages of synchronous network interfaces were painfully
     emphasised by this work.  An OSI support environment at UCL is
     available on the majority of the UNIX systems at UCL.  This means
     SUN, VAX, and Pyramid hardware.  There is also an experimental
     system operating of "Pink Book" (the UK Academic Community defined
     mapping of X.25 onto Ethernet LLC2).  This will be of more interest
     when we obtain a second piece of pink book hardware!
 
     We have been looking at the performance of these systems at various
     levels, and hope to report in more detail later.
 
     There are three separate, but related, X.400 activities.  The first
     project was to develop an X.400 to JNT Mail protocol converter
     based on the EAN X.400 system from University of British Columbia.
     This project was funded by Alvey.  Work was done to increase the
     robustness and flexibility of the system.  It was brought into a
     state where it could be operated by a group which did not need to
     understand its internal operation.  It was operated as a pilot
     service at UCL, and then was transferred to University of London
     Computer Centre (ULCC), where it is now operating as a UK Academic
     Community Service.  This is an important step towards making mail a
     full service: Previous UK mail gateway facilities have only been
     operated by their developers.
 
     The same system has also been used for a range of X.400
     interworking trials.  UCL has been involved in a number of
     interconnection exercises with various manufacturers, including
     user trials with British Telecom services.  Some of these
     connections, for example with the French Academic Network, have
     developed into experimental services.  The department uses these
     links for communication within several projects.
 
     Given the experience gained whilst developing the EAN Gateway, the
     group is now working on a more advanced protocol conversion
     facility.  This system, "PP", will be a generic X.400 system which
     supports RFC 822 based (text) mail, X.400(1984) and X.400 (1988).
     By storing messages as directory trees, it will be able to handle
     Multimedia messages in a flexible manner, and perform a wide range
     of protocol conversions (e.g. JNT Mail <-> X.400) and format
     conversions (e.g. G3 Fax <-> SUN bitmap).  Work is well underway on
     this system, and it is expected to be operational during 1988.  It
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 6]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     is intended to use this system as the basis for a range of
     experiments and pilot services.  Code will be made available to
     other research and academic groups, and its availability will be
     announced in this forum.
 
     We are working on a number of aspects of directory services.  This
     ranges from a system analogous to an online white pages telephone
     directory, to a system for high speed lookup of OSI information.
     It is generally agreed that such services are urgently required,
     but there is very little experience in this area.
 
     The THORN project (The Obviously Required Nameserver) is an ESPRIT
     project to develop a Directory Service aligned to the emerging
     standards.  There are a number of industrial and academic partners:
     Olivetti; Bull; GEC; ICL; Siemens; SW; CERN; DFN; INRIA.  These
     groups are working to develop a pre-competitive implementation of a
     directory service, in line with the emerging standards.  The first
     phase of the project has produced an implementation according to
     ECMA TR 32, with simple replication facilities specified by the
     project.  UCL is working on two aspects of this project.  The first
     is to organise and participate in what is described as the Large
     Scale Pilot Exercise.  This utilizes the system produced in the
     first phase of the project, and aims to gain real experience with
     the usage of directory services.  An experimental service will be
     provided within UCL and in other selected parts of the UK Academic
     Community.  This will interact with similar communities in France
     and Germany.  It is hoped to examine a number of different uses of
     the directory service, with support of electronic mail as a major
     consideration.  This system is just being released within UCL, and
     contains several thousand entries (people and hosts).  In the
     context of THORN, and of another Esprit project (INCA - the
     Integrated Network Communication Architecture), UCL is working
     towards the development of X.500 directory services.
 
     Steve Kille & Jon Crowcroft (jon@CS.UCL.AC.UK)
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
----------------------
 
 
     1.   For the last eighteen months I have been watching the NSFNET
          Backbone fuzzballs and gateways, learning from bizarre bogons,
          menacing martians, ominous overloads, rotten routing and all
          the other things that thrive in a healthy, growing Internet.
          Over the last few months massive fuzzware changes were made to
          cope with the recent explosion in traffic, number of nets and
          frequency of routing spasms.  I have come to the conclusion
          that further improvements in the areas of throughput and
          robustness are not in the best interests of my own research
          projects and cannot be justified in view of the impending
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 7]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
          replacement of the fuzzballs scheduled for July.  I will
          continue to evolve the fuzzball in other areas as a highly
          useful research tool and network surgical instrument.
 
     2.   One of the goals during this latest upgrade in fuzzball
          functionality was to implement and evaluate a priority-
          queueing service discipline in order to improve response times
          for interactive services like TELNET at possible expense of
          bulk-transfer services like FTP. The new discipline was
          installed at all NSFNET Backbone sites and most other sites
          early in the month. Subjective reports, confirmed by
          measurements under typical traffic conditions, indicate that
          TELNET traffic across the NSFNET Backbone has about half the
          delay and variance of non-TELNET traffic. However, since this
          effectively pushes non-TELNET traffic further back in the
          queues where quench and preemption are more likely, more study
          and possible modification of the fairness mechanisms may be
          necessary.
 
     3.   In preparation for the leap-second which ended 1987 and in
          despair of the fact I have spent the first moments of the last
          seven years advancing the year in all fuzzballs known to me,
          the fuzzball timekeeping code was extensively revised. The
          result is an automatic year rollover and automatic leap-second
          insertion via the Network Time Protocol (NTP) and fuzzball
          local-net protocols. Early on 31 December the leap-indicator
          bits were set at selected fuzzball hosts equipped with WWVB
          and WWV radio clocks. These bits were then automatically
          distributed to all NTP-speaking hosts and then further
          distributed to other hosts supporting the fuzzball local-net
          protocols. Upon the leap, all fuzzballs at U Delaware, U
          Maryland, ISI and Linkabit inserted the extra second and
          sailed accurately into 1988. The next step is to modify the
          firmware in the radio clocks themselves so they don't go
          cuckoo and have to resynchronize following the leap.
 
     4.   To see how the general Internet population coped with the leap
          second and in order to update data collected in 1983, a
          glorious three-day experiment was carried out with the
          approximately 5000 hosts and gateways listed in the NIC
          HOSTS.TXT file. Four packets were sent at five-second
          intervals to each host using UDP/NTP, UDP/TIME and
          ICMP/TIMESTAMP protocols and the clock offsets (in
          milliseconds) for each protocol averaged with respect to local
          time, which is synchronized via NTP to a radio-clock host.
          There were 46 hosts responding to NTP, 1158 responding to TIME
          and 1963 responding to ICMP requests. The distribution
          functions for each are shown below. More discussion in another
          place at another time.
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 8]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
               Decile  NTP             UDP             ICMP
               ----------------------------------------------
               1       11              4632            5698
               2       37              18238           27965
               3       66              38842           68596
               4       177             68213           127367
               5       364             126232          201908
               6       567             195950          285092
               7       3466            267119          525509
               8       20149           422129          2.91426E+06
               9       434634          807135          5.02336E+07
               10      1.17971E+09     1.59524E+09     2.11591E+09
 
 
     5.   Mike Minnich and Dave Mills attended the INARC Workshop, which
          was held at BBN on 17-18 December. See the INARC report
          elsewhere for further information. Dave Mills attended an NRC
          meeting on survivable networks in Washington on 8-9 December
          and presented a tutorial Advanced Topics in Internetworking at
          the Second TCP/IP Interoperability Conference on 1 December.
 
          Dave Mills  (Mills@UDEL.EDU)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                         [Page 9]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
NSF NETWORKING
--------------
 
     UCAR/BBN LABS NNSC
 
     Craig Partridge led a meeting on network management at the Second
     TCP/IP Interoperability Conference in Washington.  Dick Edmiston
     represented the NNSC at the NSF meeting where participants
     discussed NSFNET transition issues.
 
     Karen Roubicek (roubicek@NNSC.NSF.NET)
 
     NSFNET BACKBONE SITES
 
     CORNELL UNIVERSITY THEORY CENTER
 
     November and December have been spent primarily stabilizing the
     NSFNET backbone network through software changes, in the fuzzballs,
     the surrounding gatedaemons, and the tables for each.  The backbone
     currently carries traffic and routing information for about 105
     networks - the actual number varies, of course.
 
     Here are Doug Elias's totals for November and December.  Details
     are available upon request.
 
         ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
               NSFNET   TRAFFIC   REPORT   Period: Nov 1 - 30, '87
 
                                        Total Traffic Figures
                           Between Sites          Ethernet
                Input          111381608            61279840
               Output          105722051            55124918
               In+Out          217103659           116404758
         ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
               NSFNET   TRAFFIC   REPORT   Period: Dec 1 - 31, '87
 
                                      Total Traffic Figures
                               Between Sites          Ethernet
                  Input          110551496            62241199
                 Output          107690883            56274351
                 In+Out          218242379           118515550
         ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
     UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
 
     Line to Minnesota Research Network came up as planned.  The
     connection between P4200's is humming along.  The gated
     configurations allowing their sqawking to NSFNET came along mid-
     December.
 
     Link to IMP94 is still no joy.
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 10]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     T1 connection to UofI - Chicago is in but needs DSU/CSU's.  This
     will replace various connections currently in place in the Chicago
     area (NW, U of Chicago, Argonne NL).  May also be connection to
     Fermi, but that is not settled.
 
     by Ed Krol (krol@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu)
 
     JOHN VON NEUMANN NATIONAL SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER
 
     No report received.
 
     NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH AND UNIVERSITY SATELLITE
     NETWORK PROJECT (USAN)
 
     The Braden/DeSchon NNstat/STATSPY code has been installed on
     windom.ucar.edu and has already proved very useful not only in
     determining traffic patterns on USAN, but in detecting a network
     that was flooding USAN with rwho packets.
 
     Some statistics over a 72 hour period show the following:
 
     Total IP Packets (3.1 M).  Total Packets (4.5M)
     IP Packets destined for UCARnet (47%). Pass-through Packets (53%)
     Top nine Source/Destination (S/D) IP nets account for (50%) of traffic.
     Top 3 S/D IP nets (34%)
     Top S/D IP net (15%) is 128.138 (University of Colorado)
 
     by Don Morris  (morris@scdsw1.ucar.edu)
 
     PITTSBURGH SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER
 
     No report received.
 
     SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER
 
     Our PSN's first trunk line (to USC/ISI), installed on 29 October,
     has had the last 150 ft. at ISI installed.  We are now awaiting the
     Telco folks to come test that last piece.  The second line to UCLA,
     service date 4 Dec, is still not yet in sight.
 
     We are still looking forward to 7.4, along with an additional 0.5
     meg, for our Proteon p4200.
 
     We have had no change in our line configuration this past month.
     In January, we expect to bring up a 56k line to UC Irvine to
     connect their campus network to NSFNET.
 
     Paul Love (loveep@sds.sdsc.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 11]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     NSFNET REGIONAL AFFILIATED & CONSORTIUM NETWORKS
 
     BARRNET (No report received)
 
     JVNCNET (Refer to JVNNSC backbone report)
 
     MERIT
 
     Merit was recently awarded a cooperative agreement by the National
     Science Foundation for the upgrading, expansion and management of
     the NSFNET backbone network.  This award extends over the next five
     years.  Our proposal includes the extending of the current backbone
     to thirteen from the current six sites and using T1 lines to gain
     higher bandwidth.  The proposal also includes joint agreements with
     IBM and MCI.  IBM will be providing the hardware and the software
     to implement NSFNET's packet switching and network management
     facilities, while MCI will play a key role in providing the
     transmission backbone for the NSFNET. The T1 circuits supplied by
     MCI within their backbone will be implemented through DS3 carriers.
     Individuals wishing further information about this project may
     contact us at:
 
           "Merit_Computer_Network@um.cc.umich.edu."
 
     We started to beta test the traffic statistics program developed by
     Bob Braden at ISI.  Among other functions, the program allows
     gathering a net-to-net traffic matrix about the data flow on the
     attached Ethernet.  As this function will be a valuable tool to
     determine traffic flows within the NSFNET backbone, we started to
     use it to gather statistics on the Ethernet attached to the NCAR
     NSFNET backbone node.  This testing was possible thanks to Don
     Morris at NCAR for providing the necessary access to his machine.
 
     We have installed and are starting to use the SGMP (Simple Gateway
     Monitoring Protocol) software in our Proteon gateways while
     runninig the user application program (available from NYSERNET) on
     a Sun workstations.  We also experimented with the SGMP version
     available from Jeff Case (UTK) for IBM-PC type machines.
 
     Hardware and software designed at the University of British
     Columbia has been installed at the University of Michigan to
     implement TCP/IP protocols for mainframes running the MTS operating
     system.  The applications for Telnet and FTP are currently in alpha
     test.
 
     Western Michigan University will gateway its DECnet installations
     to the Internet world using a MicroVAX 2000, which is supposed to
     be delivered soon.
 
     A T1 line has been ordered by Michigan State University to upgrade
     the link between the University of Michigan and Michigan State.
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 12]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     This will be used for both Merit internal as well as for Internet
     traffic.  MSU has received a 56Kbps line to the Purdue Arpanet IMP,
     the modems and hardware to connect the line on its end, but still
     waiting for the line to be connected at Purdue.
 
     by Jessica Yu (jessica_yu@um.cc.umich.edu)
 
     MIDNET (No report received)
 
     MINNESOTA REGIONAL NET (MRNet) (No report received)
 
     NCSANET
 
     T1 to UI-Chicago is up and running.  University of Chicago and
     Northwestern University will be connecting through UI-C via T1 by
     March 15.  Currently these schools share a 56Kbps circuit to NCSA.
     Argonne National Laboratory, currently connected through UI-C at
     56Kbps, will upgrade to T1 as well.  Illinois Institute of
     Technology is in the process of planning to connect through UI-C at
     56Kbps.
 
     The University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee has ordered a 56Kbps
     circuit to NCSA, scheduled to be up by March 15.
 
     The Vitalink earthstation connecting Indiana University is
     scheduled to be moved (due to local construction) from UI Digital
     Computer Lab to UI Computing Applications Building at the end of
     January.
 
     by Charlie Catlett (catlett@ncsa.uiuc.edu)
 
     NORTHWESTNET
 
     All but two nodes of NorthWestNet are up and running; the last two,
     Washington State University and the University of Idaho, will be
     connected this week.  A 56 kb line to the NSFNET backbone from
     Seattle to San Diego will be installed by the end of January or
     early February.
 
     by Hellmut Golde (Golde@cs.washington.edu)
 
     NYSERNET (No report received)
 
     SDSCNET (Refer to SDSC backbone report)
 
     SESQUINET
 
     The complete initially proposed SesquiNet configuration has been
     operational now for five months.  The following campus networks are
     being served, and are advertised via EGP to the core:
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 13]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
             Baylor College of Medicine        128.249
             Houston Area Research Center      192.31.87
             Rice University                   128.42
             Texas A&M University              128.194
             Texas Southern University         192.31.101
             and the University of Houston     129.7
 
     The phone line from NSFNET/NCAR to SesquiNet/Rice has been
     completed, and we have been using this line operationally for the
     last three weeks to a limited extent.  The line connects a pair of
     cisco gateways: one integral to SesquiNet (at Rice) and the other
     integral to WestNet (at NCAR).  Since the gateway at NCAR shares an
     ethernet with USAN and with gateways for the NSFNET backbone and
     the NASA Science Network, it has lots of potential usage.  We have
     not yet, however, completed the arrangements for the exchange of
     routing information that will allow this line to be used to the
     fullest.
 
     Activities for the coming month include:
 
         > Testing the dual protocol (IP and DECnet) support for the cisco
           gateways within SesquiNet.
         > Adding Prairie-View A&M University to the network.
 
     by Guy Almes (almes@rice.edu)
 
     SURANET (No report received)
 
     WESTNET
 
 
     1.   In New Mexico, New Mexico Technet, New Mexico Inst. of Mining
          & Technology, and New Mexico State University are now
          interconnected. The 56 kbps serial line from New Mexico
          Technet to NCAR is projected to be installed by Feb.  15,
          1988.  The University of New Mexico is yet to be connected, as
          they are in the process of performing some adjustments to
          their campus network before installing the cisco gateway.
 
     2.   The University of Wyoming is connected to the Internet, but is
          experiencing minor problems with the 56 kbps serial interface
          card which are in the process of being resolved.
 
     3.   We are continuing to investigate the best manner in which to
          provide service to Brigham Young University and the University
          of Utah. A mini-proposal is being prepared in this regard, to
          be forwarded to NSF.
 
     4.   We have been negotiating with Eric Aupperle where the T1 line
          to serve Westnet should be installed. We have been told by NSF
          that the University of Utah is the favored location.
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 14]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     5.   Both Colorado State University (129.82) and New Mexico State
          University (129.138) have successfully completed the
          transition to Class B addresses.
 
     6.   David Wood has discussed with Scott Brim running the "HELLO"
          protocol on Westnet. The software is available, and we are
          waiting for it to be installed at NCAR before trying it.  We
          anticipate testing it during the month of January.
 
          by Pat Burns (pburns%csugreen.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 15]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
TASK FORCE REPORTS
------------------
 
 
     APPLICATIONS -- USER INTERFACE
 
          No report received.
 
 
     AUTONOMOUS NETWORKS
 
          No news to report for the ANTF.
 
          Deborah Estrin (Estrin@OBERON.USC.EDU)
 
 
     END-TO-END SERVICES
 
          Nothing to report this month.
 
          Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
 
     INTERNET ARCHITECTURE
 
          About forty people attended the INARC Workshop held on 17-18
          December at BBN.  The theme of the workshop was technical
          issues of the next-generation internet. A report on the agenda
          items and discussions, which included a bomb scare, will be
          available shortly.
 
          Dave Mills (Mills@HUEY.UDEL.EDU)
 
 
     INTERNET ENGINEERING
 
          1) There has been another round of growth in the IETF mailing
          list.  After exposure at the December TCP/IP Conference and in
          the December `Connexions', requests swelled the list to almost
          250 names and about 10 exploders.  We can't really host
          meetings of 250+ folks yet and I suspect (based on the actual
          attendence of the last few meetings) that many are more
          interested in the email discussions, rather than becoming
          actively involved.  Therefore, I feel it is time it re-
          institute the ietf-interest list, which I had eliminated a few
          months ago.
 
          Toward that end, I divided the full list by putting all names
          of people who attended either the last two meetings into the
          main list and the rest (and all exploders) into the interest
          list.
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 16]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
          >From now on, all general discussion should be addressed to
 
            ietf-interest@gateway.mitre.org  or
            ineng-interest@venera.isi.edu.
            (the lists at ISI and Mitre are identical.)
 
          The main list is
 
            ietf@gateway.mitre.org   or
            ineng-tf@venera.isi.edu.
            (again, the lists are identical.)
 
          The interest list, of course, includes the main list.  The
          only usage for the main list at this time will be to announce
          specific meeting details (ie, time, date, place).  The
          interest list will get announcements of upcoming meetings but
          details will be lacking so that anyone wishing to attend will
          need to request information.  This will act as a primative
          registration procedure, which may have to improved in the
          future.
 
          So let me repeat, in the interest of giving widest exposure to
          the task force discussions, please address all mail in the
          future to the interest lists.
 
          2) At the last meeting, we decided to start a draft document
          series to act as a clearinghouse for Task Force papers and
          proposed RFC's.  There are now four files in the <ietf>
          directory at sri-nic.arpa, which represent 3 TF documents and
          an index of the documents.  These files are available by
          anonymous ftp in the usual way.  The four files are:
 
          IDEA.INDEX - Index of the current or upcoming documents
                  residing in the <ietf> directory at sri-nic.arpa.  All
                  files are available by anonymous ftp in the usual way.
 
          IDEA002.txt - `A Comparison of "Link State" and "Distance
                  Vector" Routing Algorithms', Ross Callon (BBN)
 
                  Title is self-explanatory.
 
          IDEA003.txt - `Guidelines for the use of Internet-IP addresses
                  in the ISO Connectionless-Mode Network Protocol',
                  Ross Callon (BBN) and Hans-Werner Braun (U Mich)
 
                  Update of RFC-986, which proposes a mapping for DoD
                  Internet Addresses on the ISO OSI addressing format.
 
          IDEA004.txt - `Routing Information Protocol', Chuck Hedrick
                  (Rutgers)
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 17]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
                  Description of the Routing Information Protocol (RIP)
 
          (IDEA001.txt, a description of the goals, history, charter
                  and organization of the Internet Engineering Task
                  Force, is in preparation.)
 
          This is essentially an administrative mechanism meant to help
          streamline the RFC review process within the IETF.  There are
          already about 4 other documents already in the IDEA pipeline,
          in degree of preparation.  Anyone wishing to register a good
          IDEA, contact me or one of the working group chairs.
 
          3) The date of the next IETF is March 1-3 in San Diego.  Those
          wishing more information should send to ietf-
          request@gateway.mitre.org.
 
          Phil Gross (Gross@MITRE.GATEWAY.ORG)
 
 
     INTERNET MANAGEMENT
 
          No report received.
 
 
     PRIVACY
 
          Work proceeded during December on revision of RFC-989 per
          discussions at Privacy Task Force meetings during 1987; it is
          anticipated that an updated RFC will be distributed in January
          1988.  Scheduling of the next task force meeting for 2-3
          March, 1988 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory was
          confirmed.
 
          John Linn (Linn@CCY.BBN.COM)
 
 
     ROBUSTNESS AND SURVIVABILITY
 
          No report received.
 
 
     SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
 
          No report received.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 18]

Internet Monthly Report                                    December 1987
 
 
     SECURITY
 
          No report received.
 
 
     TACTICAL INTERNET
 
          No report received.
 
 
     TESTING AND EVALUATION
 
          No report received.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westine                                                        [Page 19]