<NIS.NSF.NET> [IMR] IMR90-10.TXT
 
 
 
 
 October 1990
 
 
 INTERNET MONTHLY REPORTS
 ------------------------
 
 The purpose of these reports is to communicate to the Internet Research
 Group the accomplishments, milestones reached, or problems discovered by
 the participating organizations.
 
      This report is for research use only, and is not for public
      distribution.
 
 Each organization is expected to submit a 1/2 page report on the first
 business day of the month describing the previous month's activities.
 These reports should be submitted via network mail to Ann Westine
 (Westine@ISI.EDU) or Karen Roubicek (Roubicek@NNSC.NSF.NET).
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   INTERNET ACTIVITIES BOARD
 
      IAB MESSAGE  . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  3
      INTERNET RESEARCH REPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  5
         AUTONOMOUS NETWORKS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  5
         END-TO-END SERVICES  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  5
         PRIVACY AND SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  5
         COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  7
      INTERNET ENGINEERING REPORTS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 1]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
   Internet Projects
 
      BARRNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 10
      BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN, INC.,  . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 11
      CERFNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 12
      CICNET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 13
      CORNELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 13
      CREN  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 14
      FARNET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 14
      ISI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 14
      JVNCNET, NORTH EAST RESEARCH REGIONAL NETWORK . . . . . . page 16
      LOS NETTOS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 18
      MERIT/UMNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 18
      MIDNET  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 18
      MIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 19
      MITRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 19
      MRNET. . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 21
      NCAR/USAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 22
      NEW ENGLAND ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH NETWORK . . . . . . . . page 22
      NNSC, UCAR/BOLT BERANEK and NEWMAN, INC., . . . . . . . . page 22
      NORTHWESTNET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 23
      NSFNET BACKBONE, MERIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 23
      NTA-RD  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 24
      NYSERNET  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 24
      OARNET  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 25
      PREPnet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 25
      PITTSBURGH SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 26
      RIPE (Reseaux IP Europeans) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 26
      SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER  . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 26
      SESQUINET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 26
      SRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 26
      SURANET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 27
      TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION NETWORK  . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 27
      UCL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 27
      UDEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 28
      UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN/NCSANET  . . . page 28
      WESTNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 28
      WISCNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 29
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 2]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 
 IAB MESSAGE
 
      The IAB met for one day at Interop '90.  Among the matters
      discussed at this meeting were the following:
 
      A. Network Management Policy and Direction
 
         Action was initiated to draft a replacement for the network
         management policy RFC [RFC-1052, "IAB Recommendations for the
         Development of Internet Network Management Standards", V. Cerf,
         April 1988].  This will probably involve a meeting or workshop
         to consider the future course of network management in the
         Internet.
 
      B. Acceptable Use
 
         The IAB will attempt to draft guidelines on acceptable use
         policies for mailing lists, and will try to cause the
         publication of acceptable use policies for existing transit
         networks.
 
      C. International Members
 
         The IAB made a commitment to add at least one non-US member, to
         be chosen at the January 1991 meeting.  This reflects the
         increasing internationalization of the Internet.
 
      D. ANSI Affiliation
 
         The IAB discussed possible mechanisms for affiliation with ANSI
         for the purposes of setting Internet standards.  No conclusion
         was reached, but investigation is continuing.
 
      E. RSADSI Agreement
 
         The IAB reviewed the latest draft of an agreement that an
         organization will have to sign with RSA Data Security, Inc. in
         order to become a certifying authority for Privacy Enhanced Mail
         (PEM) certificates. This agreement draft will shortly be
         published for information.
 
      F. IP Address Space Growth
 
         Noel Chiappa, IESG area director for Internet Services,
         summarized the alternatives for handling future growth in the
         number of Internet network numbers.  Although the duration of
         the present exponential growth is by no means certain, it was
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 3]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
         agreed that the responsible approach is to plan for the worst
         case.
 
         The emphasis of this discussion was on exhaustion of the IP
         address space, although it was recognized that routing
         catastrophes are likely to come much sooner.
 
      G. OSI NSAP Address Assignment
 
         Dave Katz provided valuable input to a discussion on the
         assignment of NSAP addresses for OSI nodes in the multiprotocol
         Internet.
 
      When complete, minutes of this meeting will be announced and made
      available for anonymous FTP.  The IAB will meet jointly with the
      IESG in January 1991.  In addition, all those IAB members who are
      able will attend the Boulder IETF meeting.
 
      INTERNET STANDARDS ACTIONS
 
      The IAB has approved the following IESG recommendation:
 
      o  Proposed Standard state for the MTU Discovery procedure
         developed by the "IP MTU Discovery" Working Group of the IETF,
         chaired by Jeff Mogul.
 
      This proposal elicited considerable discussion, since it will make
      a significant change in the fragmentation strategy of the Internet:
      the Don't Fragment bit in the IP header will normally be turned on.
      The Working Group had examined a number of alternative
      possibilities and made a convincing case that their approach best
      meets the scalability requirement while handling backwards
      compatibility in a reasonable manner.
 
      The IESG recommended the approval of:
 
      o  Proposed Standard state for the Telnet Environment Option,
         developed by the IETF "Telnet" Working Group, and described in
         the Internet Draft <draft-ietf-telnet-environment-01.txt>.
 
      However, the IAB has not yet approved this, because of concern that
      this option could be an open door for non-interoperable,
      undocumented, vendor-specific Telnet options.  Resolution of this
      issue with the IESG and the Telnet WG is underway.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 4]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
 
      The minutes of the previous three IAB meetings are available for
      anonymous FTP from host VENERA.ISI.EDU with the pathnames:
 
            pub/IABmins.jan90.txt
            pub/IABmins.apr90.txt
            pub/IABmins.jun90.txt
 
      Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
 INTERNET RESEARCH REPORTS
 -------------------------
 
      AUTONOMOUS NETWORKS
      -------------------
 
         The ANRG has a one day video conference tentatively planned for
         November 20.
 
         Deborah Estrin (Estrin@USC.EDU)
 
      END-TO-END SERVICES
      -------------------
 
         No internet-related progress to report.
 
         Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
      PRIVACY AND SECURITY
      --------------------
 
         Steve Kent chaired a panel on Internet Privacy-Enhanced Mail at
         Interop '90 early this month, and software and prototype
         hardware being developed by BBN in support of the P-E Mail
         registration process were shown at BBN's booth during the
         exhibition.  Panel speakers included David Balenson, Steve Kent,
         and Ken Rossen of the PSRG and Burt Kaliski from RSA Data
         Security, Inc.
 
         The Privacy and Security RG met for three days from October 23-
         25 at MITRE's McLean, Virginia facility, thanks to the
         hospitality of Rob Shirey.  Major topics of discussion during
         this meeting were implementation status of and protocol changes
         to P-E Mail.  The ongoing beta test of TIS's reference
         implementation, certificate interoperability testing with MIT
         and DEC implementations, and discussions during the last several
         PSRG meetings have all helped solidify a list of changes to the
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 5]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
         RFCs.  This list will be distributed presently on the "pem-dev"
         mailing list.  Editing of the RFCs is underway now with an
         expectation that revisions will be submitted within the next
         couple of months.  RFC 1113 is being edited by John Linn, 1114
         by Steve Kent and Ken Rossen, and 1115 by David Balenson.
 
         Subsequent to the RFC reissue, major work items will be the
         upgrade of TIS's reference implementation for compatibility with
         the changed RFCs, integration of BBN's ON software and hardware
         with the mail processing implementation, and preparation by
         RSADSI for assumption of its role as top-level certification
         authority and public notary.  In anticipation of the latter
         item, representatives from BBN and RSADSI met early this month
         to exchange documentation for ON/CA hardware and software and to
         discuss further plans for support of RSADSI's role.  At the
         McLean PSRG meeting, more detailed scheduling work was
         initiated, and RSADSI, BBN, and TIS expect to consult further on
         scheduling matters during November.
 
         Rob Shirey supplied a draft Internet Security Architecture RFC
         for discussion at the McLean meeting.  The comprehensive
         architecture provides a framework for diverse protocol security
         enhancement efforts in the Internet community. The RG went over
         this document in some detail during the meeting.  Group members
         in cooperation with Steve Crocker, IETF AD for Security, will be
         considering which other Internet RGs and WGs are best suited to
         specific contributions to the architecture.
 
         The draft Internet Security Policy guidelines document supplied
         by the Security Policy Working Group was also discussed at the
         McLean meeting.  Reaction to this document was also generally
         favorable, and Steve Crocker will be conveying specific comments
         to the draft authors.
 
         Other topics discussed at McLean include plans for the MD4
         algorithm in the Internet, and further interactions between the
         PSRG and the IETF.  The latter included a discussion of the
         newly formed Security Area Advisory Group (SAAG).  More detail
         on these topics appears in Steve Crocker's report.
 
         The next meeting of the PSRG will be held from 12-14 February at
         Xerox in Pasadena, CA.
 
         Ken Rossen  (kenr@BBN.COM)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 6]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGY
      ------------------------
 
         No report received.
 
 INTERNET ENGINEERING REPORTS
 ----------------------------
 
      1) Reminder -- The next IETF meeting will be December 3-7, 1990 in
      Boulder Colorado.  The meeting is being jointly sponsored by by
      Westnet and NCAR.  Carol Ward (University of Colorado) and Don
      Morris (NCAR) are the local hosts.
 
      Logistics information and a preliminary agenda have been sent to
      the IETF mailing list.  For a copy of this information, or to be
      added to the IETF mailing, please send to IETF-REQUEST@ISI.EDU.
 
      2) We have made another minor change in how the IETF areas are
      aligned.  We have decided to divide the activities of the Host and
      User Services Area (Craig Partridge/BBN).  The Host and User
      Services area has included 3 types of activities: application
      services (eg, nfs, rpc, graphics, etc), transport services (eg,
      TCP, UDP), and user services.  The first will be moved into the
      Applications area (Russ Hobby/UCDavis), the second will be moved
      into the Internet area (Noel Chiappa/Consultant), and user services
      will be made into a separate area by itself.
 
      I am very pleased to announce that Joyce Reynolds/ISI will be able
      to join the IESG as area director for the new User Services area.
      Joyce was formerly the chair of the User Services WG.  Craig will
      remain on the IESG in an at-large position.
 
      3) Report on documenting the IESG standards process (from David
      Crocker/DEC):
 
      A preliminary draft of the IETF standards process was submitted to
      the IESG, as a basis for further discussion.  The handling of
      materials which come from sources other than IAB working groups is
      proving particularly challenging.  Further, there appears to be a
      need to balance near-term and/or community-desired solutions which
      might not represent as strong a technical solution as the IAB and
      IESG would want.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 7]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      4) Report on the Routing Area (from Bob Hinden/BBN)
 
      This is the month to announce name changes for two working groups.
 
         The Interconnectivity working group (IWG) is now the Border
         Gateway Protocol working group (BGP).
 
         The Open Routing working group (OR) is now the Inter-Domain
         Policy Routing working group (IDPR).
 
      The new names better reflect the work that each group is doing.
 
      A charter was written by George Clapp for the new routing area
      working group dealing with IP routing over large public data
      networks.  The group will meet for the first time at the upcoming
      IETF meeting in Boulder, CO, Dec.  3-7.  The charter is as follows:
 
         IP over Large Public Data Networks (iplpdn)
 
         Chair(s):
             George Clapp, meritec!clapp@bellcore.bellcore.com
 
         Mailing Lists:
             General Discussion:  iplpdn@nri.reston.va.us
             To Subscribe:  iplpdn-request@nri.reston.va.us
 
         Description of Working Group:
 
             The IP over Large Public Data Networks Working Group (IPLPDN
             WG) will specify the operation of the TCP/IP protocol suite
             over public data networks (PDNs) such as SMDS, ISDN, X.25
             PDNs, and Frame Relay (FR).  The working group will develop
             and define algorithms for the resolution of IP addresses and
             for the routing of IP datagrams over large, potentially
             global, public data networks.
 
             The IP over SMDS Working Group has defined the operation of
             the Internet protocols when SMDS is used to support
             relatively small virtual private networks, or Logical IP
             Subnets (LISs).  Issues arising from public and global
             connectivity were delegated to the IPLPDN WG.
 
             The IPLPDN WG will also continue the work of the Private
             Data Network Routing Working Group (pdnrout) on X.25 PDNs.
             This work will be extended to include call management and
             the use of the ISDN B channels for the transport of IP
             datagrams.  Address resolution and routing over Frame Relay
             will also be discussed.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 8]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      5) Report from the Network Management Area and Directorate (from
      Chuck Davin/MIT):
 
      This month the membership of the SNMP Network Management
      Directorate is in place, and the board will organize itself at the
      December IETF meeting.
 
      Ted Brunner (Bellcore)
      Jeff Case (University of Tennessee)
      Chuck Davin (MIT)
      Frank Kastenholz (Racal Interlan)
      Keith McCloghrie (Hughes LAN Systems)
      Dave Perkins (3Com)
      Marshall Rose (Performance Systems International)
      Steve Waldbusser (Carnegie Mellon University)
      Steve Willis (Wellfleet Communications)
 
      The board will serve as a focus for broad community input into the
      development of SNMP network management within the IETF. Its
      responsibilities will center on guiding and reviewing the MIB
      development activity, on assuring that individual MIB activities
      are consistent and complementary one with another, and on
      overseeing continued growth and evolution in the management
      architecture.
 
      Phill Gross (pgross@NRI.RESTON.VA.US)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 9]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 INTERNET PROJECTS
 -----------------
 
 BARRNET
 -------
 
      Nearly 150 persons from over 75 organizations attended BARRNet's
      first annual workshop for current and prospective members on
      October 29th.  The workshop was held at Stanford University, where
      BARRNet's Network Operations Center is located.  Attendees learned
      about BARRNet's organizational and technical evolution, resources
      that are available on the Internet, simple troubleshooting
      techniques, and more.
 
      Six new members were approved in October, bringing the total number
      of BARRNet members to 75; of these 75, 60 are currently connected.
      Two new connections were made in October, including the first 9600
      bps dedicated line as part of the low-speed services expansion (see
      below).
 
      BARRNet staff has been assisting local universities and community
      colleges to prepare applications for NSF grants for Internet
      connections.  Five Bay Area institutions and college districts have
      completed and submitted proposals to date.
 
      BARRNet's low-speed host connection service trial is underway with
      9600 bps dial-in connections to dedicated ports as the first
      "production" service.
 
      The succeeding phases of the low-speed service availability are
      being developed and the first 9600bps dedicated line connection was
      installed in October.  Lab evaluation is underway of equipment for
      asynch host connection at speeds up to 38.4kbps using 56kbps
      synchronous digital lines with DSU/CSUs that provide synch-asynch
      conversion.  These low-speed digital circuits are very favorably
      priced by Pacific Bell as part of their "Advanced Digital Network"
      (ADN) offering.
 
      Installation has been continuing on the MCI DS-3 microwave link
      that will carry traffic from BARRNet to the upgraded high-speed
      NSFNET backbone.  The digital radios, antenna and all microwave
      plumbing have been installed and the balance of the equipment and
      activation are expected by the fourth week of November.
 
      by Bill Yundt <GD.WHY@forsythe.stanford.edu>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 10]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN INC.
 ----------------------------
 
      Internet Routing
 
      There now exists a complete implementation of version 1 of the IDPR
      protocols.  After performing extensive unit testing at our
      respective sites - USC, SAIC, and BBN, we are currently integrating
      all of the software developed at the three sites.  Thus far, things
      are working well and interoperating, including, for example, the
      two distinct implementations (intra-kernel and extra-kernel) of
      IDPR message encapsulation and forwarding.  We are looking forward
      to testing in DARTNet, once we are satisfied with our integration
      tests.  However, we are also pursuing alternate testing
      environments, in the event that DARTNet may not be ready this
      month.
 
      INTERNET O&M / ICBNET INFRASTRUCTURE
 
      The routing of traffic between the RSRE, STC, WPC, and NTA ICBNet
      nodes and destinations in the US was modified this month to use the
      new path provided by the 384 Kbps US/UK "fat pipe".  Routing via
      the fat pipe path has been stable.  The 64 Kbps RSRE-BBN line,
      which had previously provided US connectivity from those nodes, is
      currently scheduled for termination on 30 November.
 
      The first operational video conferences involving the new
      conferencing site at University College London (UCL), and routed
      via the US/UK fat pipe, were held this month.  These included a
      fat-pipe Policy Steering Group (PSG) meeting held at DARPA and UCL,
      and an extended demonstration of video/voice connectivity to UCL
      from the Interop show in San Jose, CA.
 
      The TWBNet gateways and WPS were removed from the SRI site this
      month.  This change is associated with the coming addition of a new
      "southern loop" to the TWBNet.  SRI's ongoing IP connectivity to
      the TWBNet will be provided via BARRNet.
 
      Steve Storch and David Waitzman attended the ICB meetings held at
      SRI and RIACS on 29/30 October.
 
      Terrestrial Wideband Network and ST/IP Gateway
 
      This month, the ST Gateway and Terrestrial Wideband projects
      supported nine conferences and 3 days of demonstrations at the
      Interop Tradeshow.  Seven conferences were held between two sites,
      two were between three sites.  The RIACS site hosted its first
      video conferences, including a conference for the ICB
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 11]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      (International Collaboration Board.)  The Interop demonstration
      involved voice/video conferencing between San Jose and UCL, London.
      Conferees included Mark Pullen , Phil Gross, John Laws and Peter
      Kirstein.  Meetings were held to discuss Simnet applications,
      ICBNet, connectivity to the UK, and various IETF working group
      topics.
 
      In the future months, a new "southern loop" will be added to the
      TWBNet.  This will provide added robustness in the form of an
      alternate path between the east and west coasts and will also allow
      shorter tail circuits to Southern sites such as Ft. Rucker and Los
      Alamos.  Current plans call for Wideband Packet Switches (WPSs) to
      be installed in Mobile and Albuquerque.
 
      Jil Westcott (westcott@bbn.com)
 
 CERFNET
 -------
 
      Over the next few months several sites will be added to CERFnet.
      DIALn' CERF continues to be a popular alternative for companies
      with lower start-up needs.  Since its installation, it has greatly
      increased the number and types of sites accessing CERFnet and the
      Internet.
 
      Local installations
 
      A 56 kilobits-per-second (kbps) link to Pepperdine University in
      Malibu was installed on October 25. A link to Aerojet General in
      Azusa was installed on October 27. The link to Aerojet was
      completed using an existing 56 kbps link from Aerojet to the San
      Diego Supercomputer Center. A 56 kbps link to the United States
      International University in San Diego was installed on November 1.
 
      Other sites scheduled to be installed in November and December are
      Santa Monica College, Fullerton College, and Loma Linda University
      and Medical Center.
 
      International connections
 
      In the final stages of planning are two international links to
      CERFnet.  The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) is
      expected to be online by February or March, 1991.
 
      The connection between CERFnet and UFRJ is intended to provide,
      among other things, Internet access to a regional network of
      research institutions located within the state of Rio de Janeiro.
      Initially nine institutions will be connected to this local
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 12]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      network. These are: Brazilian Center of Investigating Sciences
      (CBPF), Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Institute of Mathematics
      Pureand Applied (IMPA), Polytechnic Institute of Rio de Janeiro
      (IPRJ), National Laboratory of Computer Science (LNCC), Pontificial
      Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), State University
      of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) , Federal University Fluminense (UFF), and
      the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).
 
      Three of these institutions (CBPF, IMPA, and LNCC) are laboratories
      of the National Council of Scientific Development and Technology,
      which is the equivalent of the National Science Foundation here in
      the U.S.  Two are federally funded universities (UFF and UFRJ) and
      FIOCRUZ is the laboratory of the Federal Health Ministry.
 
      Also, the CICESE Institute located in Ensenada, Mexico is expected
      to be onlinein February or March, 1991. The institute will have a
      56 kbps satellite link to the San Diego Supercomputer Center.
 
      Other news
 
      In October, CERFnet exhibited at the INTEROP '90 tradeshow at the
      San Jose Convention Center. CERFnet was awarded the INTEROP
      Achievement Award for the best network in the Service sector.
 
      The installation of DIAL n' CERF was completed in August. Today
      over 70 users are subscribing to DIAL n' CERF.
 
      In early November, POP (Post Office Protocol) will be implemented
      on DIAL n' CERF making it more convenient for users to receive
      their electronic mail.
 
      CERFnet will host the seminar, Introduction to TCP/IP Protocol
      Suite, instructed by Dr. Douglas Comer, on January 30-31, 1991. For
      more information contact Karen McKelvey by sending e-mail to
      karen@cerf.net.
 
      by Karen McKelvey, <karen@cerf.net>
 
 CICNET
 -------
 
      No report received.
 
 CORNELL
 -------
 
      No report received.
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 13]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 CREN
 -----
 
      No report received.
 
 FARNET
 -------
 
      No report received.
 
 ISI
 ---
 
      INTERNET CONCEPTS PROJECT
 
      Bob Braden organized and attended a one-day IAB meeting held in
      conjunction with Interop '90.  He also delivered a talk at Interop
      on future developments in the Internet.  In October, RFC-1185 "TCP
      Extension for High-Speed Paths", written by Braden with Van
      Jacobson and Lixia Zhang, was finally published.  This RFC
      documents an extension to TCP, invented by Van Jacobson, to extend
      the region of TCP reliable delivery to very high bandwidths.  This
      extension can also be used to relax somewhat the requirement for
      enforcement of Time-to-Live in packets.
 
      Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
      Jon Postel attended the INTEROP conference and IAB meeting in San
      Jose California, October 7-12, 1990.
 
      Seven RFCs were published this month.
 
         RFC 1184:  Borman, D., Telnet Working Group, "Telnet Linemode
                    Option", October 1990.
 
         RFC 1185:  Jacobson, V. (LBL), B. Braden (ISI), L Zhang (PARC),
                    "TCP Extension for High-Speed Paths", October 1990.
 
         RFC 1186:  Rivest, R., "The MD4 Message Digest Algorithm",
                    MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, October 1990.
 
         RFC 1187:  Rose, M., (PSI), K. McCloghrie (Hughes),
                    J. Davin (MIT), "Bulk Table Retrieval with the SNMP",
                    October 1990.
 
         RFC 1188:  Katz, D., (MERIT/NSFNET) "A Proposed Standard for the
                    Transmission of IP Datagrams over FDDI Networks",
                    October 1990.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 14]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
         RFC 1189:  Warrier, U. (NETLABS), L. Besaw (HEWLETT-PACKARD),
                    L. LaBarre (MITRE), B. Handspicker (DIGITAL), "The
                    Common Management Information Services and Protocols
                    for the Internet (CMOT and CMIP)", October 1990.
 
         RFC 1190:  "C. Topolcic, (CIC Working Group), "Experimental
                    Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)",
                    October 1990.
 
      Ann Westine (Westine@ISI.EDU)
 
      MULTIMEDIA CONFERENCING PROJECT
 
      Packet multimedia conferencing made it to the InterOp show this
      year!  With a little help from ISI, BBN put on a demonstration of
      the teleconferencing system in operation between the show booth and
      University College London and with BBN in Cambridge, MA.  The demo
      went smoothly and was well received.
 
      This month the SPARCstation version of the packet video host, PVP,
      was able to run real-time video data through the HSIS board (the
      High Speed Interface for the S-Bus), thanks to Van Jacobson's HSIS
      device driver.  Another milestone was that PVP and the packet voice
      host, VT, were able to run simultaneously in the same SPARCstation
      machine.  In addition, PVP was extended to use not only the new
      method for conference initiation using the BBN Host Control
      Protocol, but also either of the old methods -- mimicking VT
      connection state or operator keyboard commands.  Peter Kirstein
      from UCL visited ISI to learn about our implementation of the
      packet voice and video software.
 
      Eve Schooler attended the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work '90
      Conference in Los Angeles, CA, October 7-11, and Annette DeSchon
      presented a seminar entitled "Overview of the ISI Multimedia
      Conferencing Voice Terminal (VT) Program" at ISI on October 18th.
 
      After a long time in development, the ST protocol specification was
      expeditiously processed by the RFC editor and has now been released
      as RFC 1190.
 
      Steve Casner, Annette DeSchon, Dave Walden, Eve Schooler
      (casner@ISI.EDU, deschon@ISI.EDU, djwalden@ISI.EDU,
      schooler@ISI.EDU)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 15]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 JVNCNET, NORTH EAST RESEARCH REGIONAL NETWORK
 ---------------------------------------------
 
      Director:  Sergio Heker
      Compiled by Rochelle Hammer
 
      Location:
      B6 von Neumann Hall
      Princeton University
      Princeton, N.J.  08540
 
      609-258-2400
      Please excuse the fact we have not submitted a report for several
      months.  This was due to the involvement of the network staff in
      the large and important task of relocation and transfer of JvNCnet
      from JvNC to Princeton University.  All the staffs' efforts,
      especially the collaboration between engineering, operations, and
      network installation and maintenance groups, assured a smooth
      transition and our users saw very little interruption of services.
 
      September's network availability reached 99.82%, the month we
      actually became settled at Princeton University and the highest
      availability for the year September 89 to September 90.  The
      average uptime for the period May to Sept. 1990 is 99.40%.  Traffic
      statistics are also provided.
 
                      Availability    Traffic (in Billion packets, input)
      May             99.50           2.3
      June            99.55           2.3
      July            98.88           2.6
      August          99.15           2.8
      September       99.82           2.9
 
      The largest percentage of traffic increase occurred in May with 15%
      over April, and July with 13.4% over June and the average amount of
      traffic for the same five months is 2.58 billion packets.  NEARnet,
      Princeton, Rutgers and NORDUnet have continually contributed the
      largest portion of JvNCnet traffic.
 
      Line utilization statistics
 
      Based on the number of days in each month, line utilization program
      tracks peak, average and exceeded threshold (ET).  ET is the
      percentage of 15 minute-sample input and output of traffic
      exceeding the line utilization low threshold.  The low threshold is
      established at 75% for 56 kbps line (changed to 50% starting
      September 1990), 15% for T1 (1.544 Mbps line), and 4% for Ethernet.
      These statistics are available to the JvNCnet members and indicate
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 16]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      the high utilization for each line and offer an efficient
      evaluative tool for our engineering group to determine a site's
      performance and load on the JvNCnet and to the JvNCnet members to
      ascertain the need for upgrade.
 
      Network servers (NISC.JVNC.NET and R2D2.JVNC.NET) migrated to SUN 4
      RISC platforms providing name server, boot server and NICOL server
      functions.  R2D2 resides on the Sun Sparcstation and is the SNMP
      server as well providing the above-mentioned functions.  NETMON and
      NETLOG, monitoring and logging applications, were installed in two
      Network Operations Center Sparcs along witha variety of X-based and
      systems resources.  Ford and Zaphod EGP peers received fast-
      switching MCI interface cards and all routers run cisco 8.1.
      Charles Hedrick of Rutgers University helped the engineers to
      upgrade all routers to 8.1.  Version 8.1 has significantly
      strengthened reliability and response time, while eliminating
      transient routing loops caused by line flaps.  In order to provide
      transparent service to the users, duplication of the gateways
      (Ford, Zaphod, Hotblack, and Zarniwoop) and the NSFnet was
      performed and then placed in the new location.  The old NSS were
      transferred to Princeton as the temporary NSS's replacement.
      Princeton now uses an Ethernet gateway.  Previously under
      Princeton's aegis, the INRIA connection (Swiss and French Network),
      with direct EGP communication to the NSS, will be monitored by
      JvNCnet.
 
      The JvNCnet Regional Meeting was held on September 26-27, 1990 and
      marked the "inaugural" occasion of the JvNCnet incorporation at
      Princeton University.  Starting the Wednesday afternoon session,
      President Harold Shapiro and Dr. Ira Fuchs, Vice President for
      Computing both welcomed everyone and chose to state how valuable
      and necessary researchers and scholars have for utilizing the
      Internet and international links as well as the significant role it
      plays in their daily work.  Dr. David Farber presented an
      enlightening talk about the gigabit network, the current
      "experiment" at the University of Pennsylvania and its part in the
      NREN project.  Dr. Jun Murai, Associate Professor in the Department
      of Environmental Information, Keio University, gave an interesting
      presentation about internetworking in Japan and described the
      research and academic networks in Japan.  On Thursday, Mr. Eric
      Aupperle, Director of MERIT, provided an update of the NSFnet's
      operations and engineering plans and the relationship between DS1
      and DS3 networks.  Dr. Jane Caviness, the NSF Deputy Program
      Director discussed NSF funding issues and national and
      international networking.  Mr. David Hochman, Acting Director of
      the New Jersey Commission on Science and Technology commented on
      the commission's positive direction in favoring network enhancement
      in New Jersey and achieving its ultimate goal to have every college
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 17]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      and university in the State of New Jersey network-connected. Alan
      Watt, Network Manager, described the design and how Yale University
      utilizes the network.  Sergio Heker, Sze-Ying Wuu, Dan Leonard and
      Brendan Becker of the JvNCnet staff, respectively spoke about
      management and operations, engineering, installation and
      maintenance, and information services.
 
      Sites which have become operational on JvNCnet, their specific
      bandwidth, other changes, and future installations.
 
      IEEE                              56k to Newark BNS
      Rohm and Haas                     T1 to Phila BNS
      Trenton State College             56k to Trenton BNS
      Siemens Corporate Research, Inc.  changed from Ethernet to
                                        56k to Trenton
      Yale                              upgraded to T1  at the New
                                        Haven backbone.
      NORDUnet                          upgraded to 64k on a TAT-8
                                        circuit
      Mead Data Central                 56k to Trenton BNS
      JANET disconnection               due to DARPA fat-pipe
      Trinity College                   to install 56k to New Haven BNS
 
 LOS NETTOS
 ----------
 
      In coordination with CERFnet, the IGRP timers were changed to allow
      faster convergence on link outages.
 
      Walt Prue (Prue@ISI.EDU)
 
 MERIT/UMNET
 -----------
 
      No report received.
 
 MIDNET
 ------
 
      No report received.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 18]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 MIT-LCS
 -------
 
      This month the requisite wiring to support the Dartnet connection
      within the building is being completed and debugged. Semyon Dukach
      configured the local SPARC router so that its console serial line
      may be accessed via Kermit from a nearby Unix host.  All functions
      of the SPARC console are thus available across the Internet.
 
      Chuck Davin (jrd@PITT.LCS.MIT.EDU)
 
 MITRE Corporation
 -----------------
 
      This is a report on the past six months of Internet Engineering-
      related research at MITRE.
 
      OSI CONGESTION AVOIDANCE
 
      We have just completed our study of OSI congestion avoidance using
      the DEC bit scheme.  We collaborated on this work with K.K.
      Ramakrishnan of DEC.  In the bit scheme, the routers set a bit in
      the header of packets that arrive at queues whose average length is
      one or higher.  The receiving TP4 decreases and increases the
      credits it gives to the sender based on the bits it receives.  This
      scheme has been specified in the NIST Implementors' Workshop Stable
      Agreements.  In 1989, we implemented it in the University of
      Wisconsin ARGO TP4/CLNP, tested the implementation in the Internet
      Engineering Testbed, and contributed the prototypes to Berkeley for
      inclusion in the BSD GOSIP release.
 
      The goal this year was to test the effectiveness of the scheme with
      more realistic internetwork configurations and traffic patterns.
      The algorithms have been simulated extensively, but with the
      exception of our earlier study, their internetwork performance has
      not been measured.  We have compared the fairness, delay and
      throughput performance of the bit scheme with a "baseline"
      behavior.  In the baseline, TP4 receives a fixed credit allocation
      of 8 PDUs, and it responds to a retransmission timeout by backing
      its credit down to one PDU until all outstanding PDUs are
      acknowledged.
 
      The experiments were:
 
           Intermittent traffic with uni-directional traffic
 
           Two-way constant demand traffic
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 19]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
           Mixed file transfer/remote login traffic
 
           Mixed TCP/TP4 constant demand traffic.
 
      As part of this task, we have also developed a TP4 module for the
      MIT Simulator.  It includes congestion avoidance and supports mixed
      traffic scenarios. A technical report on the OSI internet
      performance experiments is not yet available for public release.
      Our notable general conclusion is that the DEC algorithms are
      effective and can be implemented efficiently (about 20 instructions
      in the router).  We are preparing an IETF plenary presentation on
      the bit scheme study.  TP4/CLNP will soon have regular users in the
      Internet and we are concerned that their implementations will not
      behave well facing Internet congestion.  We are also working on
      several research and conference papers.
 
      RATE-BASED TP4
 
      In the last half year we have extended the ARGO TP4 and CLNP in a
      prototype that implements the Flow Protocol defined by Lixia Zhang.
      The TP Connection Request Quality of Service parameters are used
      for the Flow Control Protocol exchanges.  We have begun to analyze
      the performance of the prototype.  The experiments were:
 
           Two-way traffic
 
           Unequal path traffic
 
           Increasing utilization
 
      Preliminary results are that Virtual Clock, the router's service
      discipline, is efficient in the kernel device drivers, and that the
      algorithms benefit performance.
 
      X.400 PERFORMANCE
 
      We have just completed a proof-of-concept prototype to test the
      applicability of using a full GOSIP stack in the tactical
      environment - an environment characterized by low bandwidth, noise,
      and loss.  This initial study focused on low bandwidth.  We ported
      the Wisconsin ARGO X.400 software to a MicroVaxII on the MITRE
      Internet Engineering Testbed.  The MicroVaxII was already running
      the rest of the Wisconsin stack.  A Testbed LANs was configured
      into two sections so that traffic between the sections would always
      be routed through gateways connected by a SLIP line.  In actuality,
      all hosts in the test, including the gateway hosts, were on the
      same LAN (so we could monitor them from one promiscuous Ethernet
      interface and obtain one-way wire times). However, from the user
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 20]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      and host viewpoint, each section was a separate LAN connected by a
      low-bandwidth transmission medium.  We built an event driven
      message generator that used the ARGO X.400 application to send
      messages between hosts on each section.  Experiments were run with
      the SLIP line having a baud rate of 600 baud and 4800 baud.  The
      experiments were also run with and without the use of our OSI
      Congestion Avoidance implementation.  Performance data was gathered
      from logs kept by the ARGO implementation, and from data gathered
      by the MITRE monitor program OSI trace.  OSI trace, which previous
      to this project parsed TP4 and CLNP Protocol Data Units,  was
      extended to parse session protocol data units and to dump 61 bytes
      of the application message protocol data unit.  This prototype
      indicated that even with a low bandwidth, lower layer transmission
      was not a major factor in message delivery times, provided
      congestion avoidance was used.  We concluded that given proper mail
      queueing and connection strategies, and the use of OSI Congestion
      Avoidance, the full GOSIP stack is acceptable for tactical
      messaging.
 
      We continue to participate in the University of Wisconsin NASA-
      funded X.400 Pilot project.  An X.400 mail gateway is running on a
      Sun 3/60 in the Internet Engineering Testbed and we have exchanged
      messages with Wisconsin.  In this Pilot, X.400 is transported over
      the Internet by RFC 1006 TP0 over TCP.
 
      INTERNET PERFORMANCE
 
      We presented a paper at SIGCOMM '90 on Random Drop Congestion
      Control.
 
      We are beginning a new project to develop visualizations of
      performance traces from the Testbed, and produce videos from them.
      We have begun a three-dimensional animation of gateway congestion
      control data.  It is possible to see the evolution of the
      clustering described by Hashem in MIT/LCS/TR465. The analysis will
      focus on correlations of traffic by gateway queuing and effects of
      resource reservation and rate control on the traffic processes.
      Traces from our experiments with rate-based TP4 will also be
      visualized.
 
      Allison Mankin (mankin@gateway.mitre.org)
 
 MRNET
 -----
 
      No report received.
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 21]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 NCAR/USAN
 ---------
 
      No report received.
 
 NEW ENGLAND ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH NETWORK
 -----------------------------------------
 
      NEARnet held its semi-annual user and technical seminar at BBN on
      October 26.  More than 160 people attended.  Highlights included a
      panel on "Introducing the Internet at Your Organization", a
      demonstration of user interface software, and a technical workshop
      on Internet security.  Video tapes of the sessions are being made
      available; contact NEARnet for more information.
 
      A leased line to the JvNCnet was installed on October 26.  This
      will allow NEARnet traffic to bypass the JvNCnet backbone,
      alleviating congestion for NEARnet and JvNCnet users and reducing
      the hop count between the NEARnet hub and the NSFnet backbone.
      This line will be in service until the NEARnet NSS is installed and
      accepted early in 1991.
 
      NEARnet announced that a dial-up Internet service will be available
      in December.  The service will support email, ftp and telnet
      connections at 9600 baud, and will provide mail queuing and primary
      and backup domain service.  Single hosts, terminals or networks can
      connect.
 
      The NEARnet Newsletter is available for anonymous FTP from host
      NIC.NEAR.NET, directory newsletters.
 
      by John M. Rugo <jrugo@bbn.com>
 
 NNSC, UCAR/BOLT BERANEK and NEWMAN, INC.
 ----------------------------------------
 
      The NNSC published the 8th issue of the NSF Network News.
 
      Karen Roubicek spoke about networking at an International Botanical
      Symposium in Delphi, Greece.  Jane Dineen gave a presentation at
      the NEARnet Technical and User Seminar at BBN.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 22]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      Electronic mail updates to the Internet Resource Guide are now
      distributed in either plain text or PostScript files.  Previously,
      people on the list had to receive both postscript and plain text.
      To request a change in update format, recipients should send a
      message to <resource-guide-request@nnsc.nsf.net> indicating which
      version they prefer.
 
      The NNSC distributed additions to Chapters 1, 2, and 3 of the
      Internet Resource Guide.
 
      by Corinne Carroll <ccarroll@nnsc.nsf.net>
 
 NORTHWESTNET
 ------------
 
      No report received.
 
 NSF BACKBONE (Merit)
 -------------------
 
      The October 1990 count of packets coming into the NSFNET backbone
      totalled 5,245,630,461 packets.  This total represents a 26.56%
      increase over the September 1990 total of 4,144,462,818 packets.
      As of 1 October, statistics will include traffic for NSS 18 at the
      Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.  A node in the
      expansion of the NSFNET backbone, NSS 18 became operational at the
      end of September.  A total of 2063 networks are configured for
      announcement on the NSFNET backbone as of the end of October.
      Statistics for nodes on the NSFNET backbone are available for
      anonymous ftp from the directory STATS on NIS.NSF.NET.  Available
      data types are inpacket totals for each node on the NSFNET backbone
      (INPKTS), minimum, maximum and average of one-way delay times
      between each node on the NSFNET backbone (PING), traffic by service
      (PORTS), and traffic by network (TRAFFIC).
 
      Visitors to the Merit/NSFNET Network Operations Center included
      Osamu Takada of Hitachi Corporation, Japan, and representatives of
      the Deutsches Forschungsnetz (DFN).
 
      Merit/NSFNET staff participated in InterOp 90 in San Jose, CA,
      including Hans-Werner Braun, Principle Investigator for the NSFNET
      Backbone project; Glee Cady, manager of Merit/NSFNET Information
      Services; Susan Calcari and Laura Kelleher, of Information
      Services; Bilal Chinoy and Dave Katz, of Merit/NSFNET Internet
      Engineering.  A prototype network monitoring tool developed by
      Merit, was demonstrated on the conference floor in the IBM booth.
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 23]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      The NSFNET project was also represented at EDUCOM 90.  Glee Cady
      and Susan Calcari of Merit provided discussion of NSFNET
      developments at the IBM booth.  Susan organized and moderated
      Special Interest Groups on "Enhancing Education Through National
      and Regional Networking" and the "NSFNET Backbone and National
      Networking Update." Also attending was Ellen Hoffman, assistant to
      the Merit President.
 
      Jim Sweeton, of Merit/NSFNET Information Services Mainframe Systems
      group, served on the ACM SIGUCCS 1990 Program Planning Committee.
      Jim gave presentations on "Open Systems for Information Exchange"
      and "The Automation of User Services in the Coming Information Age"
      at the User Services Conference XVIII in Cincinnati, Ohio. Susan
      Hares, of Merit/NSFNET Internet Engineering, attended the MIDnet
      technical meeting in Lincoln, NE.  Susan presented information on
      the current state of the backbone as well as plans for T3 and OSI
      implementation.  Larry Kostecke, of Merit/NSFNET Information
      Services Mainframe Systems group, attended the fall workshop of the
      SPIRES Consortium in St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
 
      Jessica Yu and Elise Gerich, both of Merit/NSFNET Internet
      Engineering, were its representatives to the first meeting of the
      Internal Engineering Planning Group in Santa Fe, NM, held October
      22-24.  Jessica and Elise also attended a meeting of technical
      representatives from PACCOM and North American and European CCIRNs.
      On the 25th of October, dedication ceremonies were held for CA*Net,
      the Canadian National Research Network.  Steve Wolff, of the
      National Science Foundation, addressed attendees and Elise Gerich
      represented the Merit/NSFNET project.
 
      Jo Ann Ward (jward@merit.edu)
 
 NDRE and NTA-RD
 ---------------
 
      No report received.
 
 NYSERNET
 --------
 
      No report received
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 24]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 OARNET
 ------
 
      OARnet T1 Backbone Uses OSPF Routing Protocol
 
      We have recently constructed a high-speed backbone of T1 links for
      OARnet.  There are now multiple paths between some sites.
      Generally, we prefer paths that use the T1 links.  Within OARnet we
      have been using RIP as our IGP. This has proven inadequate because
      routes are determined based on hop-count (distance) rather than
      line speed.  Another problem is slow convergence.
 
      OSPF, a link-state protocol, was developed by an IETF working group
      and is defined in RFC 1131.  OSPF supports TOS-based routing,
      equal-cost multipath, tagged external routes, authentication, and
      area-routing.
 
      OARnet Engineering has implemented OSPF routing for the T1 backbone
      covering the Columbus, Cleveland, Akron, and Toledo areas.  This
      has given us the necessary routing control to effectively utilize
      the T1 links.  It is still necessary to run RIP in some parts of
      OARnet because OSPF has not been implemented by all router vendors.
      The borders between OSPF areas and RIP areas require careful
      consideration.  We plan to use OSPF in all OARnet routers as soon
      as possible.
 
      by Lin Daniels <lin@osc.edu>
 
 PREPnet
 -------
 
      Duquesne University joined PREPnet in October.  They will  be
      connected to the Pittsburgh hub at 56Kbps.
 
      The Whitaker Foundation has awarded PREPnet a grant to build a hub
      in Harrisburg.
 
      A number of the PREPnet Steering Committee members met with Al
      Weiss of ANS, Inc. at EDUCOM '90.  They discussed ANS's goals and
      plans, and how ANS will affect PREPnet and other regional networks.
      Al Weiss will be making a more detailed presentation to the
      Steering Committee in November.
 
      Tom Bajzek, PREPnet's Executive Director, was re-elected as
      Secretary of FARNet.
 
      PREPnet, NIC (prenet+@andrew.cmu.edu)
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 25]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 PITTSBURGH SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER
 -------------------------------
 
      No report received.
 
 SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER
 ------------------------------
 
      No report received.
 
 SESQUINET
 ---------
 
      No report received.
 
 SRI
 ----
 
      DDN NIC
 
      Information about all IP number and ASN assignments are now
      available through the NIC WHOIS server.  WHOIS will respond to
      queries about network names or numbers and ASN names or numbers.
 
      A number of usage policy statements have been collected and are
      being stored on host ftp.nisc.sri.com (network address
      192.33.33.53).  Files that are currently available via anonymous
      FTP are:
 
         netinfo/cerfnet.policy
         netinfo/cren.policy
         netinfo/farnet.policy
         netinfo/fricc.policy
         netinfo/mrnet.policy
         netinfo/northwestnet.policy
         netinfo/nsfnet.policy
 
      Beginning this month we will be providing more comprehensive
      reports in this forum on IP network number assignments.  In
      addition to reporting on the numbers assigned during the past
      month, we will also be reporting on the cumulative totals of Class
      A, B, and C assignments to date.
 
      In October we assigned 297 numbers to new IP networks.  The total
      of all IP numbers assigned is now 23,268.  This includes numbers
      that fall within assigned "blocks" and numbers that were previously
      regarded as being "unconnected".  The total number of assigned
      Autonomous System numbers (ASNs) is now 1,100.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 26]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      There are currently a total of 2,090 registered domains which
      includes 54 at the top level, 1,986 at the second level, and 50
      third-level MIL domains.
 
                              Cumulative Statistics
 
      Month/Year                       Class
 
                              A       B       C           Total
 
      Oct. 1990               36      3,846   19,386      23,268
 
      Douglas MacGowan (macgown@nic.ddn.mil)
      Mary Stahl (stahl@nisc.sri.com)
 
 SURANET
 -------
 
      No report received.
 
 TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION NETWORK
 ------------------------------
 
      No report received.
 
 UCL
 ----
 
      Further use has been made of the video conferencing facility.  We
      have written a server to control our own video switch which can be
      accessed via ANSA RPC; unfortunately, this isnt compatible with
      existing video switch controller access which is via Sun RPC.
 
      We have started measuring the performance of the UK-US "Fat Pipe"
      throughput and delay characteristics, and the interaction of IP and
      ST on the path. We are studying the effects of resource reservation
      and sharing.
 
      We have (finally) installed a Rugby Radio receiver and are in the
      process of making our NTP on ROS talk to this device so we can
      offer a decent time service to the UK(GB).
 
      Steve Kille attended Interop at San Jose. Peter Kirstein chaired
      the ICB meeting at SRI and RIACS - a video conference was held
      between RIACS and UCL, and between RIACS and BBN during the
      meeting.
 
      John Crowcroft (j.crowcroft@CS.UCL.AC.UK)
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 27]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
 ----------------------
 
 
      1.   Thanks to long hours spent by Mike Davis, Mitch Levin and the
           PSI crew, our DARTNET line is now operational. We now have a
           working router, and line, but still have not resolved all the
           problems with the HSI T1 interface. We have also installed a
           SPARCstation on the same net as the router for use as an
           experiment host.
 
      2.   A fuzzball time server originally from JvNC has been
           refurbished with hard disk and configured for operation at the
           MIT NSS when installed. This will have a WWVB timecode
           receiver and serve the NEARNET populace. Several new public
           time servers have popped up in the US, UK, FRG and Australia.
           Details can be found in the file pub/ntp/clock.txt on
           louie.udel.edu.
 
      3.   Our fancy cesium clock lost tick and was replaced courtesy of
           the US Coast Guard, who along with US Naval Observatory have
           been most supportive or our timekeeping activities. Some
           analysis of how to improve time-transfer for DARTNET and our
           high-speed network now in design suggests the use of a LORAN-C
           receiver and disciplined quartz oscillator. Although this
           scheme is in use now here and at NTARE in Norway, commercial
           LORAN-C receivers are much too expensive for casual use. A
           design for an inexpensive LORAN-C receiver as an IBM PC
           parasite has been completed and is now under construction.
 
           Dave Mills (Mills@UDEL.EDU)
 
 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN/NCSANET
 --------------------------------------------------
 
      No report received.
 
 WESTNET
 --------
 
 
      1.   The Westnet annual technical meeting will be held November 28
           to 30 at the University of Colorado at Boulder.  Speakers
           include: Sue Hares of Merit, Scott Zumbahlen of Synoptics,
           David Hampton of cisco, Paul Tsuchiya of Bellcore, Jeff
           Schiller of MIT, and several from within Westnet.  Topics
           include: NSFNet, FDDI experiences, 10 BaseT,
           hierarchical/policy routing, and Kerberos.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 28]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                     October 1990
 
 
      2.   Novell, Solbourne computer and Utah Valley Community College
           have newly joined Westnet, and are up and running.
 
           by Pat Burns (pburns@csupwb.colostate.edu)
           David C. M. Wood (dcmwood@spot.colorado.edu)
 
 WISCNET
 -------
 
      No report received.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 29]