APRIL 1991
 
 
 INTERNET MONTHLY REPORTS
 ------------------------
 
 The purpose of these reports is to communicate to the Internet Research
 Group the accomplishments, milestones reached, or problems discovered by
 the participating organizations.
 
      This report is for Internet information purposes only, and is not
      to be quoted in other publications without permission from the
      submitter.
 
 Each organization is expected to submit a 1/2 page report on the first
 business day of the month describing the previous month's activities.
 These reports should be submitted via network mail to Ann Westine
 (Westine@ISI.EDU) or Karen Roubicek (Roubicek@NNSC.NSF.NET).
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   INTERNET ACTIVITIES BOARD
 
      IAB MESSAGE  . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  3
      INTERNET RESEARCH REPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  3
         AUTONOMOUS NETWORKS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  3
         END-TO-END SERVICES  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  3
      INTERNET ENGINEERING REPORTS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 1]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
   Internet Projects
 
      BARRNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  6
      BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN, INC.,  . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  6
      CALSTATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  8
      CORNELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  9
      ISI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 10
      JVNCNET, NORTH EAST RESEARCH REGIONAL NETWORK . . . . . . page 12
      LOS NETTOS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 14
      MERIT/MICHNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 14
      MITRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 15
      NNSC, UCAR/BOLT BERANEK and NEWMAN, INC., . . . . . . . . page 15
      NSFNET BACKBONE, MERIT NETWORK, INC., . . . . . . . . . . page 15
      NDRE and NTA-RD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 17
      PREPnet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 17
      SRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 17
      UCL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 18
      UDEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 18
      WISCNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 18
 
   DIRECTORY SERVICES ACTIVITIES
 
      DIRECTORY SERVICES MESSAGE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 20
      IETF OSIDS & DISI WORKING GROUPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . page 20
      FOX - FIELD OPERATIONAL X.500 PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . page 20
         ISI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 21
         MERIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 21
         PSI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 22
         SRI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 22
      NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. . . . . . page 23
      NORTH AMERICAN DIRECTORY FORUM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 24
      OSI IMPLEMENTOR'S WORKSHOP (OIW). . . . . . . . . . . . . page 24
      PARADISE PROJECT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 25
      PSI WHITE PAGES PILOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 27
      REGISTRATION AUTHORITY COMMITTEE (ANSI USA RAC) . . . . . page 28
      SG-D MHS-MD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 29
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 2]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 
 IAB MESSAGE
 
      STANDARDS ACTIONS:
 
      The IAB has taken the following actions on standards since March
      1991, in accordance with recommendations by the IESG:
 
         * Proposed Standard state for OSI CLTS over UDP.  This is a
           companion to RFC-1006.
 
         * Proposed Standard state for PPP Extension to Bridging.
           This has been published as RFC-1220.
 
         * Draft Standard state for POP3 (RFC-1081).
 
         * Historic state for the POP3 Extension defined in RFC-1082.
 
      Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
 INTERNET RESEARCH REPORTS
 -------------------------
 
      AUTONOMOUS NETWORKS
      -------------------
 
         There is nothing to report this month.
 
         Deborah Estrin (Estrin@USC.EDU)
 
      END-TO-END SERVICES
      -------------------
 
         The End-to-End Research Group held a two-day meeting at Bell
         Laboratories in Murray Hill, NJ.  Sandy Fraser and Krishnan
         Sabnani of AT&T as well as Dave Sicoskie and Ira Cotton of
         Bellcore participated in the meeting.
 
         Topics discussed included: alternative traffic control
         mechanisms, including the new VJ/DDC proposal; the extent and
         nature of the requirement for service guarantees; the need for
         hop-by-hop jitter control; the economics of public networks; the
         X-Kernel as a possible universal basis for protocol R&D; the
         need for admission control to limit congestion; how not to
         implement UDP; and how not to design a host interface.
 
         Bob Braden (Braden@ISI.EDU)
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 3]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 INTERNET ENGINEERING REPORTS
 ----------------------------
 
      1) New Working Groups for Apr 01, 1991 to Apr 30, 1991
 
          Internet Message Extentions (822ext)
          Network News Transport Protocol (nntp)
 
      2) Internet Draft Activity for Apr 01, 1991 to Apr 30, 1991
 
       (Revised draft (o), New Draft (+) )
 
         WG         I-D Title
       ------       -----------------------------------------------------
       (snmp)     o Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB
                      <draft-ietf-snmp-interfacemibext-02.txt>
       (snmp)     o Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-
                    like Interface Types
                      <draft-ietf-snmp-ethernetmib-05.txt>
       (snmp)     o Definitions of Managed Objects for the SIP Interface
                    Type
                      <draft-ietf-snmp-smdsipmib-01.txt>
       (null)     o An Approach to CO/CL Interworking-- Part II: The
                    Short-Term -- Conventions for Transport-Service
                    Bridges in the Absence of Internetworking
                      <draft-ccirn-cocl-doc2-01.txt>
       (no wg)    o Tunneling IPX Traffic through IP Networks
                      <draft-provan-ipxtunneling-01.txt>
       (ospf)     o OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
                      <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfmib-03.txt>
       (osinsap)  o Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet
                      <draft-ietf-osinsap-internetalloc-01.txt, .ps>
       (snmpsec)  + SNMP Administrative Model
                      <draft-ietf-snmpsec-admin-00.txt, .ps>
       (snmpsec)  + SNMP Security Protocols
                      <draft-ietf-snmpsec-protocols-00.txt, .ps>
       (snmpsec)  + Definitions of Managed Objects for Administration
                    of SNMP Parties
                      <draft-ietf-snmpsec-mib-00.txt>
       (test)     + dfsgdsfgsdfgsdfg
                      <-  >
       (bgp)      + Border Gateway Protocol NEXT-HOP-SNPA Attribute
                      <draft-ietf-bgp-nexthop-00.txt>
       (none)     + The IP Network Address Translator (Nat):
                    Preliminary Design
                      <draft-tsuchiya-addrtrans-00.txt, .ps>
       (snmp)     + SNMP Communications Services
                      <draft-ietf-snmp-commservices-00.txt>
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 4]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
       (null)     o An Approach to CO/CL Interworking  -- Part III:
                    The Long-Term -- Conventions for Network-Layer
                    Relays and Transport-Service Bridges in the
                    presence of Internetworking
                      <draft-ccirn-cocl-doc4-01.txt>
 
      15 Drafts produced,  8 new this period
 
      3) RFC's Produced  for Apr 01, 1991 to Apr 30, 1991
 
        RFC        Group           Title
       ------- -- --------   --------------------------------------------
       RFC1214    (oim)       OSI Internet Management: Management
                              Information Base
       RFC1220 ps (pppext)    Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions for
                              Bridging
 
      Standards( 1),  Experimental(  ), Informational( 1)
 
      Phill Gross (pgross@NRI.RESTON.VA.US)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 5]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 INTERNET PROJECTS
 -----------------
 
 BARRNET
 -------
 
      One new T1 connection, three 56kbps connections, and one dial-in
      connection were completed in April, bringing the number of
      connected members to 84. One of the 56kbps connections is the first
      trial of a bridged Ethernet to be installed by BARRNet.
 
      The T3 ENSS is now fully operational; all traffic routed to NSFNet
      sites that are also connected by T3 at the other end is now
      traversing the T3 backbone.
 
      by Paul Baer <baer@jessica.stanford.edu>
 
 BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN INC.
 ----------------------------
 
      Terrestrial Wideband Network (TWBNet) and ST/IP Gateway
 
      During April, conferencing facilities were installed at RADC.
      There are now seven conferencing sites -- UCL, BBN, RIACS, ISI,
      DARPA, Germany, and RADC.  These sites participated in a total of
      ten video conferences and demonstrations.  Of these, four included
      four sites, three included three, and the remaining three were
      point to point.  Two of the four way conferences included UCL, and
      the multipoint connection was handled by the hublet.  Conferences
      were held for discussions in the following areas: the Internet
      Activites Board, the IETF Coip WG, the Directory WG, an ad-hoc WG
      on Connection-oriented Connection-less Internetworking, Inter-
      Domain Policy Routing Development Group, Dartnet experimenters, and
      the UK Fat-pipe Operational Management Group.  The TWBNet was also
      used to support three Simnet exercises -- two included three sites
      and lasted 3 days, one involved two sites and lasted one day.
 
      Inter-Domain Policy Routing
 
      During the month of April, we focused on three different topics:
      enhancing the IDPR prototype implementation, preparing a usage and
      configuration document for users of IDPR, and preparing a draft of
      our proposed mechanisms for policy-based resource allocation.
 
      In early April, we held a videoconference with the IDPR software
      developers from BBN, USC, and SAIC to discuss the results of our
      various experiments with the prototype implementation.  In
      particular, we discussed performance measurements (both the amount
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 6]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      of processing time required for path setup and the amount of
      processing time required to forward data traffic) conducted by USC
      and SAIC, features of the architecture to be added to the
      implementation, and minor problems discovered.  For more detail on
      all of these, please write to idpr@bbn.com.  The minor bugs
      discovered we fix immediately, but we are also eager to add more
      functionality to the prototype.  Unfortunately, there is not enough
      of the developers' time to accomplish things as quickly as we wish;
      all of the current developers are overcommitted.
 
      To simplify the process of adding IDPR capabilities to routers in
      one's administrative domain, we are preparing an Internet Draft
      describing how to configure transit policies, as well as other IDPR
      parameters.  In the document, we will provide a configuration
      template as well as sample configurations for example domains.  We
      hope to have a draft available for review by early June.
 
      We are also preparing a document on the routing, flow control, and
      resource reservation mechanisms we intend to bundle together to
      implement policy-based resource allocation.  We hope to have a
      draft available by early June.  Resources permitting, we may also
      be able to implement some subset of these mechanisms in a prototype
      later in the summer.
 
      Internet O&M / ICBNet Infrastructure
 
      During the month of April, we closely monitored the status of the
      US/UK "fat pipe" to see if the new software in the Butterfly
      gateways at ULCC and SURA had alleviated the routing problems which
      had appeared in December of last year. For the first half of the
      month, BBN worked closely with NRI, with each location running
      independent tests and exchanging daily reports.  The main
      conclusion at the end of this period was that overall fat pipe
      performance had returned to an acceptable level.  (Availability
      data accumulated by BBN between mid-March and mid-April showed the
      connection to be up approximately 96% of the time.) Reports from
      NRI also showed that there were 2 minute outages occuring at
      irregular intervals which we have traced to fragmentation
      reassembly timeouts in the Butterfly software. This is a new
      problem which has appeared since the total number of nets being
      advertised from the NSFNet and the DCA Mailbridges have exceeded
      2000 nets and the new software now carries all of these routes.  We
      have not yet found the exact cause of this problem.
 
      We began preliminary testing for the upcoming conversion to the
      newer BBN T/20 router at ULCC, SURA and other ICBNET locations. As
      part of this testing, we have replaced the BBN-WB gateway with a
      T/20 router.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 7]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      The Operations Management Group of the Fat Pipe met formally for
      the first time by video conference. Participants included ICB
      members at UCL and representatives from NASA, BBN, NRI at the AMES,
      BBN and DARPA sites respectively.
 
      Jeanne Pinette <jpinette@BBN.COM>
 
 CALSTATE
 --------
 
      The California State University Network (CSUnet)
 
      Progress this month:
 
      - Most CSUnet Backbone Ring nodes now running at T-1
 
      Most of the T-1 circuits on the CSUnet T-1 Backbone Ring have been
      installed and are operational.  Only one circuit (San Francisco to
      San Luis Obispo) is pending due to phone company delays.
 
      The CSUnet T-1 Backbone Ring links the twenty California State
      University campuses across the entire State of California.  The
      Backbone nodes now upgraded and interconnected are:
 
      (1) California State University, Sacramento TO
      (2) San Francisco State University TO
      (3) California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo TO
      (4) CSUnet Network Operations Center (SWRL) in Los Alamitos TO
      (5) San Diego State University TO
      (6) California State University, Fullerton TO
      (7) California State University, Fresno TO
      (1) California State University, Sacramento
 
      Also, a T-1 donated by the California Department of Water Resources
      interconnects (1) CSU Sacamento to the (4) SWRL CSUnet Network
      Operations Center.
 
      A postscript map of the T-1 topology can be obtained by anonymous
      ftp to nic.CSU.net.  The file "CSUnet_T1.ps" should be transferred
      in binary mode to obtain the correct formatting.
 
      Late news in: [May 3, 1991] T-1 MUX purchase order issued, install
      on June 3
 
      After almost a year of effort, the procurement of T-1 multiplexor
      equipment for CSUNET is in its final phase.  A purchase order was
      issued today to Digital Equipment Corporation for 21 Stratacom T-1
      multiplexors, one for each of the twenty California State
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 8]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      University campuses.  Unlike conventional circuit-switched
      multiplexors, these employ advanced "frame relay" and "fast packet"
      technology.
 
      The Phase I sites to be delivered June 3 are:
          - CSUnet Network Operations Center in Los Alamitos, California
          - California State University, Fullerton
          - San Diego State University
 
      Phase II installs are scheduled for the early part of July at:
          - San Francisco State University
          - California State University, Sacramento
          - California State University, Fresno
          - California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
 
      The remaining fourteen sites will be installed at a rate of one per
      week beginning in August.  [The campus installation order was
      determined by the systemwide CSUnet Network Task Force last Fall].
 
      Mike Marcinkevicz (mdm@CSU.net)
 
 CORNELL
 -------
 
      Wide-Area Multicasting
 
         The main area of investigation now is how different routing
         protocols will interact in the real world, and how multicast
         packets should be delivered at the interfaces between of
         autonomous systems, given typical administrative goals and
         restrictions on routing protocol behavior, the possibility of
         multiple logical networks on one physical network, and so on.
         The draft RFC for OSPF extensions is having the details added;
         completion of the BGP extensions document is waiting until we
         have thought through the possible problems at administrative
         boundaries mentioned above.
 
      Gatedaemon
 
         Jeff Honig attended a meeting at Merit to discuss integration of
         OSI routing protocols into gated and its use on the NSFNet
         backbone.  Volunteers stepped forward to integrate the BSD 4.3
         Reno reduced radix tree routing table code and Wisconsin's
         Integrated Stack IS-IS into the latest gated development code.
         Merit is implementing IDRP.  Yet another volunteer is working on
         a SMUX interface to the ISODE snmp daemon.
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                         [Page 9]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
         Integration of the University of Maryland's OSPF into gated is
         progressing nicely.  We hope to be able to participate in the
         next round of OSPF interoperability testing in June.
 
      International Connections
 
         The new connection to INRIA became operational on 4-25-91 and
         the new connection to NORDUNET became operational on 5-2-91.
         The old connections through JVNCNET will remain as backup for
         thirty days.
 
      Scott Brim (swb@chumley.tn.cornell.edu)
 
 ISI
 ---
 
      GIGABIT NETWORKING
 
      Greg Finn is writing a paper that discusses utilizing a certain
      class of emerging Gigabit LANs to be used internally in an
      architecture as well as externally as they are today.
 
      ATOMIC
 
      Greg Finn has been working on issues concerning the ATOMIC network.
 
      INFRASTRUCTURE
 
      Joyce Reynolds travelled to the DDN NIC April 9 & 10th.  Joyce
      travelled to UCDAVIS to participate as a volunteer "master helper"
      at their "Mining the Internet" event, April 11 & 12.  Joyce
      travelled to Washington, D.C., April 22-24, as an invited
      participant of the EDUCOM/NSF Workshop on Information Services.
 
      14 RFCs were published.
 
         RFC 1208:  Jacobsen, O., and D. Lynch, "A Glossary of
                    Networking Terms", Interop, Inc., March 1991.
 
         RFC 1209:  Piscitello, D., and J. Lawrence, "The Transmission
                    of IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service", Bell
                    Communications Research, March 1991.
 
         RFC 1210:  Cerf, V. (CNRI), P. Kirstein (UCL), and B. Randell
                    Newcastle on Tyne), "Network and Infrastructure
                    User Requirements for Transatlantic Research
                    Collaboration Brussels, July 16-18, and Washington
                    July 24-25, 1990", March 1991.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 10]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
         RFC 1211:  Westine, A., and J. Postel, "Problems with the
                    Maintenance of Large Mailing Lists, USC/Information
                    Sciences Institute, March 1991.
 
         RFC 1212:  Rose, M., (PSI), and K. McCloghrie (Hughes Lan
                    Systems), "Concise MIB Definitions", March 1991.
 
         RFC 1213:  McCloghrie, K., (Hughes Lan Systems), and Rose, M.,
                    (PSI), "Management Information Base for Network
                    Management of TCP/IP-based internets: MIB-II",
                    March 1991.
 
         RFC 1214:  LaBarre, L., "OSI Internet Management: Management
                    Information Base", Mitre, April 1991.
 
         RFC 1215:  Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for
                    use with the SNMP, Performance Systems
                    International, March 1991.
 
         RFC 1216:  Richard, P., (Almanac Institute) and Prof. Kynikos,
                    Miskatonic University, "Gigabit Network Economics
                    and Paradigm Shifts", April 1991.
 
         RFC 1217:  Cerf, V., "Memo from the Consortium for Slow
                    Commotion Research (CSCR)", CSCR, April 1991.
 
         RFC 1218:  The North American Directory Forum, "A Naming Scheme
                    for c=US", April 1991.
 
         RFC 1219:  Tsuchiya, P., "On the Assignment of Subnet Numbers",
                    Bellcore, April 1991.
 
         RFC 1220:  Baker, F., Editor, "Point-to-Point Protocol
                    Extensions for Bridging", ACC, April 1991.
 
         RFC 1221:  Edmond, W., "Host Access Protocol (HAP)
                    Specification - Version 2", BBN, April 1991.
 
      Ann Westine (Westine@ISI.EDU)
 
      MULTIMEDIA CONFERENCING
 
      Several experiments were conducted this month with the SPARCstation
      version of the Voice Terminal (VT) program, the packet audio
      component of our teleconferencing system.  The ST-I version of VT
      was modified to make use of IP-multicast on the IP-encapsulated ST
      packets.  This was used during an audio teleconference which
      connected six DARTnet sites including BBN, ISI, LBL, SRI,
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 11]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      University of Delaware, and Xerox PARC.  Meanwhile, we have built a
      SunOS kernel combining BBN's socket-interfaced kernel ST-II (RFC
      1190) implementation with the DARTnet router kernel modules
      provided by Van Jacobson, and we have made a new version of VT
      using that ST-II socket interface.  Both the kernel and VT are in
      testing.
 
      Redesign of the conference connection management architecture has
      also begun.  The intent is to extend our distributed model to
      accommodate more flexibility in modes of operation for office-to-
      office conferencing that are not feasible in the current meeting-
      room-style system.  Important characteristics include support for
      heterogeneous site configurations, robustness in the face of
      network flakiness, and multiple user interfaces.
 
      Steve Casner made a presentation on "Multimedia Collaboration" at
      the National Software Exchange workshop at NASA/Ames.
 
      Eve Schooler, Steve Casner, Annette DeSchon (schooler@ISI.EDU,
      casner@ISI.EDU, deschon@ISI.EDU)
 
 JVNCNET, NORTHEAST RESEARCH REGIONAL NETWORK
 --------------------------------------------
 
      JvNCnet
      Princeton University
      B6 von Neumann Hall
      Princeton, NJ  08544
 
      Director:  Sergio Heker
 
      Compiled by Rochelle Hammer
 
      JvNCnet Contact information:
 
      Information     "nisc@jvnc.net"      609-258-2405   9:00-5:00 M-F
      Operations      "noc@jvnc.net"       609-258-1544
      24hours/ 7days
      General number:  609-258-2400
 
      Network availability as of April 25 is 99.86%.
 
      An automated RFC responder mechanism is being completed and will be
      announced next month.  This mechanism will allow users with
      Internet connectivity to retrieve RFCs from "nisc.jvnc.net" by
      sending an electronic mail message with a specified format.
      NISC.JVNC.NET is an official repository for RFCs.
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 12]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      The National University of Singapore was connected to the JvNCnet
      by a 64kbps IP link.  The connection became operational on time
      time thanks to the cooperation of the Singapore staff, the
      telephone company, and JvNCnet staff.  This connection becomes part
      of the "international system" supported by JvNCnet.  This system
      consists of a T1 line from the JvNCnet headquarters in Princeton to
      the telephone company international gateway.  The T1 is channelized
      to accommodate a number of international circuits.  The channel
      bank located at the JvNCnet headquarters allows for multiple 64kbps
      (or 56kbps) channels for each card and currently supports one
      112kbps channel to CA*NET, 64kbps to NORDUnet and 64kbps to
      Singapore. From the channel bank, the connections go to different
      gateways (the NSFNET node for the CA*NET connection and cisco
      routers for the others).  Currently the Singapore connection to the
      United States is being advertised to only JvNCnet member networks
      until it is configured in the NSFNET policy database.
 
      Introduction to Data Networking and TCP/IP is scheduled to take
      place on Friday, May 17, 1991 at Princeton University.  Pre-
      registration is preferrable and most convenient by sending
      electronic mail to Allison Pihl at pihl@jvnc.net or by calling
      609-258-2406. Upon receipt of your registration, an informational
      package with agenda, directions and campus map will be mailed.
      Please call Ms. Pihl with any questions or comments.
 
      Attendees: The seminar is appropriate for network operations and
      technical staff of local area networks.  This course is designed as
      an entry level introduction to TCP/IP networking and how the
      operations of a network are performed.
 
      Registration fee:  $50 for staff of JvNCnet member institutions.
                         $150 for all others interested.
 
      The fee includes introductory reference materials (seminar
      documentation), lunch, and refreshments.
 
      JvNCnet SEMINAR
      Introduction to Data Networking and TCP/IP
      Friday, May 17, 1991
      Computer Science Building, Princeton University
      (CS BOWL 104)
 
              TENTATIVE AGENDA
 
      9:30    Continental Breakfast
      10:00   Welcome
      10:15   What is a network?
              What makes a network?
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 13]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      11:15   Break
      11:30   An Introduction to TCP/IP
      12:30   Lunch
      1:45    How do these four functions affect networking?
                      Operations
                      Installation and Maintenance
                      Information Services
                      Engineering
      3:00    Break
      3:15    Questions and Answers
      5:00    Adjourn
 
 LOS NETTOS
 ----------
 
      The TRW network interconnection site was successfully moved to
      their new location.  As per the norm both Pacific Bell and GTE have
      made errors in their phone bills concerning start and stop dates
      for the new and old circuits.
 
      Unisys in Camarillo has terminated their network connection to Los
      Nettos.
 
      Walt Prue (Prue@ISI.EDU)
 
 MITRE Corporation
 -----------------
 
      On the OSI front, John McGuthry and Walt completed the introduction
      of CLNP routing  into the  I.E. Testbed and retested with Europe.
      They then introduced CLNP routing into some of the MITRE production
      routers.  We now have CLNP routing, FTAM, and X.400 communication
      between the Bedford, Washington, and Colorado Springs sites.
 
      Walt Lazear articipated in DCA's PSTP working group on Network
      Management held at BDM 9 April.  He briefed the group on IETF net
      management activities.
 
      Shari Galitzer, Kit Leuder, and Forrest Palmer attended the IFIPS
      Symposium on Integrated Network Management.
 
      Last month's report neglected to acknowledge that Allison Mankin
      and Rick Wilder attended the IETF, where their congestion avoidance
      work was presented.  Sorry for the omission.
 
      Walt Lazear (lazear@gateway.mitre.org)
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 14]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 NNSC, UCAR/BOLT BERANEK and NEWMAN, INC.
 ----------------------------------------
 
      The NNSC Tour of the Internet is now also available via the NSFNET
      portion of the CSNET Info-Server.  To retrieve the Tour, send a
      message, to: info-server@nnsc.nsf.net, in the body of the message,
      type the following:
 
      request: nsfnet
      topic: internet-tour
      request: end
 
      The topic "internet-tour" is a list of two topics:
 
      internet-tour-readme
      internet-tour.sit.hqx
 
      in directory /nfs/nnsc/nnsc/ftp/internet-tour
 
      (The binhex file for the Internet Tour comes in 17 fragments.)
 
      The NNSC also distributed additions to Chapters 2 and 3 of the
      Internet Resource Guide.  Karen Roubicek attended the NSF Workshop
      on Information Services.
 
      Corinne Carroll <ccarroll@nnsc.nsf.net>
 
 NSFNET BACKBONE (Merit Network. Inc.)
 -------------------------------------
 
      The April 1991 inbound packet count for the NSFNET T1
      infrastructure totaled 7,544,331,873 packets, an increase of 7.37%
      over the March inbound packet total of 7,026,153,681.  Networks
      announced via the NSFNET numbered 2622 at the end of April; foreign
      networks represent 793 of the 2622 network total.
 
      Approximately 400 configured networks now route traffic between
      each other on the T3 infrastructure.  Traffic through nodes at Ann
      Arbor, Pittsburgh, Ithaca, Boston, San Diego, Palo Alto and
      Champaign totaled 409,349,186 inpackets, with production traffic
      continuing to be phased from T1 to T3.
 
      Connectivity for NEARNET to the NSFNET was established via the T3
      node at Boston.  Routing backup to the NSFNET is provided to
      NEARNET with the cooperation of JvNCnet through NSS 8 at Princeton.
      The Ann Arbor T1-T3 interconnect was deployed to a private
      Ethernet, enabling traffic to be monitored between the two networks
      independently of any other traffic.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 15]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      Sue Hares and Dave Katz of Merit/NSFNET Internet Engineering met
      with Jeff Honig (Cornell), Yakov Rekhter (IBM Yorktown), Rob Hagens
      (Wisconsin), Steve Heimlich (IBM Yorktown), and Rich Woundy (IBM
      Milford) in Ann Arbor to discuss the implementation of OSI in the
      T3 infrastructure.  Of particular interest is building a publicly
      available implementation of OSI routing protocols, including IDRP
      and dual stack IS-IS in gated.  The proposed means of connecting
      OSI domains has wide technical acceptance, and is on the OSI
      standards track.  On April 10th, two United States regionals
      exchanged pure OSI stack traffic using commercially available
      products over NSFNET.  The end systems were Sun workstations
      running the SunNet OSI code (version 7.0) at Merit and MITRE; the
      stacked protocol was full OSI using CLNP at the network layer and
      FTAM at the application layer.
 
      Guests at the Merit Network Operations Center included Tony Bates,
      of the University of London Computing Center.  Bates' discussed
      network operations and United Kingdom network routing to the
      NSFNET.
 
      Eric Aupperle, President of Merit Network, Inc., attended the
      FARNET meeting in Austin, TX.  Dave Katz attended a meeting of the
      OSI Network and Transport Layer Technical Working Group in Raleigh,
      NC, and presented a paper on FDDI to Electronic Imaging West in
      Anaheim, CA.  Elise Gerich, also of Merit/NSFNET Internet
      Engineering, was its representative to the FEPG meeting in
      Livermore, CA.
 
      Glee Cady, manager of Merit/NSFNET Information Services attended
      the 1991 Faxon Institute in Reston, VA, "Creating User Pathways to
      Electronic Information."  Pat Smith, of Merit/NSFNET Information
      Services, participates on the SIGUCCS Networking Task Force, a
      group interested in reaching the thousands of potential users who
      are not aware of the benefits offered by a national network.  NETTF
      convened at the spring SIGUCCS Computer Center Management Symposium
      in St. Louis, MO.  Susan Calcari, also of Information Services,
      conducted the workshop, "Enhancing Education with NSFNET," and gave
      the NSFNET overview at the plenary session of the California
      Educational Computing Consortium Workshops held in Davis, CA.
 
      Jo Ann Ward (jward@merit.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 16]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 NDRE and NTA-RD
 ---------------
 
      There is nothing to report from NDRE or NTA-RD this month.
 
      Anton Leere (leere@ndre.no)
 PREPNET
 -------
 
      No progress to report this month.
 
      PREPnet NIC (prepnet+@andrew.cmu.edu)
 
 SRI
 ----
 
      Internet registry activities in April included the assignment of
      xxx IP network numbers.  The cumulative total of all assigned IP
      numbers is now 30,917.  There are now a total of 1,261 assigned
      Autonomous System numbers (ASNs) assigned.
 
      There are currently a total of 2,741 domains registered with the
      NIC, including 61 at the top level, 2,624 at the second level, and
      56 third-level MIL domains.
 
                         Cumulative IP Network Statistics
 
      Month/Year                       Class
 
                              A       B       C           Total
 
      Apr. 1991               43      4,977   25,897      30,917
 
      Mar. 1991               41      4,520   24,572      29,133
 
      Feb. 1991               39      4,347   22,552      26,938
 
      Jan. 1991               39      4,246   21,731      26,016
 
      Dec. 1990               36      4,305   21,811      26,152
 
      Nov. 1990               35      4,198   21,149      25,382
 
      Mary Stahl (stahl@nisc.sri.com)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 17]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 UCL
 ----
 
      There were several video conferences from UCL in April. The main
      two were the IETF Directory Group meeting, which was 4 way plus
      voice, and the IETF CO-CL working group which was 3 way with voice
      to France.
 
      Crowcroft attended Infocomm in Miami, and TriComm at UNC in North
      Carolina and gave papers on Floor Control for Conferencing, and on
      the UCL CAR/DARPA/LIVENet video conferencing activities.
 
      A number of experiments with constant rate IP traffic on JANET have
      been conducted to see if the current pilot IP service is suitable
      for carrying video traffic.
 
      John Crowcroft (j.crowcroft@CS.UCL.AC.UK)
 
 UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
 ----------------------
 
 
      1.   The Cornell fuzzball time server finally expired from a disk
           stroke after five years of faithful tick. While its embers may
           yet find light elsewhere, it has been replaced by a Unix
           machine at the same stratum and address.
 
      2.   Erik Perkins and Dave Mills participated in a DARTnet audio
           teleconference, while Dave Mills attended an End-to-end
           Research Group meeting at AT&T Murray Hill.
 
           Dave Mills (Mills@UDEL.EDU)
 
 WISCNET
 -------
 
      Training sessions for user consulting staff were held at UW-Madison
      and at UW-Eau Claire.  Presentations included a national network
      overview, the domain system, network mail and gateways, use of
      tools (nslookup, whois, etc.), news, security issues, and
      demonstrations of various network commands.
 
      The WiscNet Board met this month and approved replacement of the T1
      lines connecting UW-Madison to the State's data network with a
      fiber link.  This link will also carry XUNet to the UW-Madison
      Computer Science Department and some other bulk analog services.
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 18]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      The Board also approved our membership agreement.  We expect to
      approach about six additional colleges or vocational and technical
      schools who have expressed interest in WiscNet membership in the
      near future.
 
      Michael Dorl (dorl@macc.wisc.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 19]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
 DIRECTORY SERVICES
 ------------------
 
 This section of the Internet Monthly is devoted to efforts working to
 develop directory services that are for, or effect, the Internet.  We
 would like to encourage any organization with news about directory
 service activities to use this forum for publishing brief monthly news
 items.  Current reports include:
 
         o IETF OSIDS & DISI Working Groups
         o Field Operational X.500 Project
            - ISI
            - Merit
            - PSI
            - SRI
         o National Institute of Standards and Technology
         o North American Directory Forum
         o OSI Implementor's Workshop
         o PARADISE Project
         o PSI WHITE PAGES PILOT
         o Registration Authority Committee (ANSI USA RAC)
         o U.S. Department of State, Study Group D,
             MHS Management Domain subcommittee (SG-D MHS-MD)
 
 Steve Hotz (hotz@isi.edu)
 DS Report Coordinator
 
 IETF OSIDS & DISI WORKING GROUPS
 --------------------------------
 
      Refer to IETF section (above) for the OSIDS and DISI working group
      reports.
 
 FOX -- FIELD OPERATIONAL X.500 PROJECT
 --------------------------------------
 
      The FOX project is a DARPA and NSF funded effort to provide a basis
      for operational X.500 deployment in the NREN/Internet.  This work
      is being carried out at Merit, NSYERNet/PSI, SRI and ISI.  ISI is
      the main contractor and responsible for project oversight.
 
      Steve Hotz (hotz@ISI.EDU)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 20]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      ISI
      ---
 
         ISI organized the April 17 FOX phone conference, which included
         participants from all of the FOX contractors and several
         government agency representatives.  The primary topics of this
         meeting were: (1) a discussion of the FOX project and how it
         relates to various other X.500 efforts, (2) status of and
         questions about the ongoing activities at each site, and (3)
         potential research issues that FOX may need to resolve to
         facilitate Internet X.500 deployment.  Hotz produced minutes for
         this meeting, which were distributed to the participants.
 
         The March 1991 Directory Services Activities Report was edited
         and submitted to be included in the PARADISE International X.500
         report.
 
         Bob Braden and Steve Hotz attended the April 11 IETF OSI-DS
         videoconference.  Hotz supplied ISI site notes for inclusion in
         the meeting's minutes.
 
         Steve Hotz (hotz@ISI.EDU)
 
      MERIT
      -----
 
         Merit FOX members participated in a meeting at NSF on Network
         Information Services, to help determine requirements for the new
         "NIC".  Emphasis was placed on Directory Services as an
         important requirement to be provided, and on the incorporation
         of X.500 in particular.
 
         Work and discussions on the interim network infrastructure
         information schema and DIT drafts continued.
 
         Merit began the initial design and discussion of a scheme for
         representing Internet resources in X.500.
 
         Chris Weider (clw@merit.edu)
         Mark Knopper (mak@merit.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 21]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      PSI
      ---
 
         A tool to translate from RFC-INDEX.TXT to QUIPU's EDB format was
         developed; the Directory has been updated accordingly.  These
         entries are contained in the Directory under:
 
                @o=Internet@cn=RFC Documents
 
         A document relating NADF-123 and X.500 in the Internet was
         circulated to the FOX partners.
 
         Marshall Rose (mrose@cheetah.ca.psi.com)
 
      SRI
      ----
 
         The White Pages Pilot (WPP) Project DSA offering access to SRI
         staff information, San Joaquin Kit Fox, was upgraded to ISODE
         6.8.
 
         SRI continued work on providing access to WHOIS information via
         the Directory.  A prototype DSA offering access to Individual,
         Computer, Network, Domain, Autonomous System, Organization, and
         Group information is running locally at SRI.  Schema additions,
         both new objects and attributes, were made to support the WHOIS
         information.  The prototype employs the new schema but does not
         yet contain distinguished name references (e.g., between
         individual and computer that they coordinate); these will be
         added in early May.  Also in May, SRI will contact the WPP
         Manager to have this DSA added to the Pilot DMD, and apply to
         have the WHOIS-supporting objects and attributes added to the
         Cosine and Internet X.500 Schema.
 
         An early analysis of WHOIS data mapping to the Directory
         revealed that a significant number of entries fail postalAddress
         length restrictions (6 address lines, each no greater than 30
         characters).  47% of the addresses listed for Individuals failed
         the length restrictions; a majority of the failures were due to
         the 30 character per address line limit.  SRI will pursue a
         means to provide feedback to the standards community on this
         issue.
 
         As part of the Directory Information Services (pilot)
         Infrastructure Working Group (DISI), an RFC/FYI document
         cataloging X.500 implementations will be created.  Ruth Lang,
         along with Russ Wright of LBL, wrote and distributed an X.500
         implementation survey form to relevant Internet mailing lists.
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 22]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
         Although the date for receipt of survey forms was 5/3/91, late
         survey input will be accepted.  Contact rlang@nisc.sri.com or
         wright@lbl.gov to receive a survey form.  The DISI working group
         will review and edit input during the month of May.  It is
         anticipated that this document will be distributed as a draft
         RFC/FYI in June.
 
         Ruth Lang attended the OSI-DS videoconference meeting held on
         April 11, and was the designated scribe for the RIACS site.
         Jose Garcia-Luna, Ken Harrenstien, and Ruth Lang participated in
         a FOX project phone conference meeting held on April 17.
 
         Ruth Lang (rlang@NISC.SRI.COM)
 
 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
 ----------------------------------------------
 
      NIST is involved in several X.500 activities: standards, pilot
      deployment, and development of an X.500 implementation, Custos.
      The objective is to see X.500 widely deployed and used in the US
      government.  X.500 is expected to be in the next release of the US
      Government OSI Profile (GOSIP).  In the standards efforts, emphasis
      is on access control and replication; the other activities are
      described in some detail below.
 
      (A) NIST/GSA X.500 Pilot Deployment
 
      NIST and GSA are collaborating in the creation of a U.S. government
      X.500 pilot deployment.  To date, two meetings have been held.  At
      the second, held on April 25th at NIST, significant progress was
      made towards refining an initial draft schema developed by NIST.  A
      number of government agency requirements will be included in the
      next schema revision.  Once the schema is defined, agencies will
      begin collecting data for loading into the directory.  Initially,
      NIST will offer to host agency data on Custos DSAs running at NIST.
      Eventually, agencies are expected to obtain and operate DSAs.
 
      The next meeting of the NIST/GSA pilot project is scheduled for
      June 18, 1991.  Operational deployment is expected to begin in
      October 1991.
 
      (B) Custos Update
 
      The NIST X.500 public-domain implementation, Custos, is implemented
      on ISODE, although it otherwise bears no relation to QUIPU.  One of
      its more interesting features is that the DBMS interface is SQL,
      and we provide a simple DBMS as part of Custos to support the DSA.
      Information can be optionally loaded into memory, and the memory
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 23]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      usage is reasonably efficient on a per-entry basis.
 
      NIST has implemented, tested, and made a limited release of Custos,
      referred to as Release 0.1.  It implements the read, add, compare,
      and list operations, along with a significant amount of
      "infrastructure" code that applies to all operations.
 
      The organizations that have received Release 0.1 are: SRI and
      Merit, which plan to incorporate Custos into the FOX effort; York
      University in Toronto, which plans to instrument it with OSI
      network management; and COS, which intends to use Custos to
      evaluate X.500 test systems.  The conditions for getting 0.1 are
      that the organization make some contribution to improving the
      implementation, and only minimal support from NIST is provided
      until Release 0.2 is available.
 
      An interim release of 0.1 will be made available by May 15 which
      incorporates additional efficiencies in the DBMS, and modifications
      for DAP interoperability with OSIWARE and QUIPU.
 
      Search, access control, and schema management are currently under
      development.  This is the additional functionality for Release 0.2,
      which is due out in October.  The extent of the distribution for
      this release has not yet been determined.
 
      Richard Colella (colella@osi.ncsl.nist.gov)
 
 NORTH AMERICAN DIRECTORY FORUM
 -------------------------------
 
      NADF-123 was published as an informational RFC (RFC-1218).
 
      Marshall Rose (mrose@CHEETAH.CA.PSI.COM)
 
 OSI IMPLEMENTOR'S WORKSHOP (OIW)
 --------------------------------
 
      The OSI Implementor's Workshop (OIW) is an open public forum for
      technical issues, concerned with the timely development of
      implementation agreements based on emerging international OSI
      standards.  The Workshop accepts as input the specifications of
      emerging standards for protocols, and produces as output agreements
      on the implementation and testing particulars of these protocols.
      This process is expected to expedite the development of OSI
      protocols and to promote interoperability of independently
      manufactured data communications equipment.
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 24]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      The Workshop organizes its work through Special Interest Groups
      (SIGs) that prepare technical documentation.  The SIGs are
      encouraged to coordinate with standards organizations and user
      groups, and to seek widespread technical consensus on
      implementation agreements through international discussions and
      liaison activities.
 
      The Directory SIG of the Workshop produces agreements on the
      implementation of Directory protocols based on ISO 9594 | CCITT
      X.500 Recommendations.  There are three major areas that the SIG is
      working on for 1991: access control, replication, and distributed
      operations.  Three subgroups have been formed, each focusing on one
      of these areas.  The SIG plans to achieve agreements in these areas
      based on the Draft International Standards and the Draft Amendments
      by the end of 1991.
 
      At their last meeting (March, 1991), the subgroups detailed
      workplans and produced outlines of the agreements.  At their next
      meeting (scheduled for June 10-14, 1991), the groups expect to
      start to produce actual agreements based on the output of the April
      1991 ISO/CCITT Directory Editor's meeting.
 
      Youbong Weon-Yoon (youbong@arch2.att.com)
 
 PARADISE
 --------
 
      The first PARADISE report (found in the March 1991 Internet
      Monthly) was a summary of what the project was about and who was
      involved.  This report is a summary of what's been happening over
      the last three months.  Subsequent reports will contain only
      monthly status updates.
 
      (A) Central DSA
 
      The SUN 4/330 was configured with ISODE-6.7m and was running a test
      DSA from 30 January.  Extensive connectivity tests of IPSS, IXI,
      Janet and Internet were made with no significant problems.  On
      February 18, the DSA became "Giant Tortoise" and thus held the
      master copy of the root of the pilot DIT (Directory Information
      Tree).  The DSA has been running since then without major problems.
      It is now accepting an average of 3000 associations per week, with
      approximately 10,000 operations per week.  Most of these are caused
      by either the replication protocol or by the relay service giving
      IXI access to the US via the Internet.  The SUN is connected to the
      Internet via the "Fat-Pipe" and is now running SUNOS 4.0.3 and has
      been upgraded to ISODE 6.8.  System back-up procedures are now in
      place, and automatic back-ups to tape are done nightly.  There have
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 25]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      been some complaints about the fat-pipe connection to the US; since
      a recent software upgrade there have been very few outages.  There
      is now a backup via Germany which will kick in if necessary.
 
      (B) Central DUA
 
      Work on the interface for the central DUA service is progressing
      steadily and should be ready on schedule in June.  This service
      will run on the SUN 4/470 purchased by the project.  The interface
      is currently able to resolve most queries given to it, although
      more work is still needed.  Additional work is also needed on
      formatting the output of results to the user.  A test version of
      the interface will be made available via the central server to the
      PUNTERS for comments and appraisal in the near future.  It is hoped
      that this interface will come on-line in June, with the possibility
      of other simple interfaces available on the central server.
 
      (C) Central Support
 
      A staff appointment has been made for the PARADISE HelpDesk based
      at ULCC.  Phone and email contact have been available since April
      29th.
 
           Telephone:          +44 71 405 8400 x432
           Telefax:            +44 71 242 1845
           Email:              helpdesk@paradise.ulcc.ac.uk
 
 
      There will also be an info-server which it is hoped will contain a
      variety of PARADISE documents, including a number of "living"
      documents:
 
           o    a list of reference implementation sites
           o    a product file of DSAs
           o    a product file of DUAs
           o    the PARADISE International Report
           o    a calendar of meetings and events relevant to
                PARADISE and the Internet
 
      (D) PUNTERS
 
      The national pilots involved in the project are known as the
      PUNTERS (Paradise UNfunded parTnERS).  Representation is mostly
      drawn from members of RARE WG3, and is clear for all countries
      where national pilots exist, or at least country level nodes have
      been taken.  In those other cases, it is unclear who the
      representative is, or which group will represent a future national
      pilot.  The next PUNTERS meeting will be held back-to-back with the
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 26]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      RARE WG3 meeting in Zurich, September 30th through October 2nd.  It
      is hoped that demonstrations and tutorials will be offered.
      Internet visitors will be welcomed.
 
      During the last quarter, AUSTRIA has connected its single DSA to
      the pilot, and hopes to add another shortly.  ITALY provided the
      first non-QUIPU implementation in the pilot.  Systems Wizards
      participated in interoperability testing with UCL to demonstrate
      their product DirWiz.  IRELAND has put up a DSA, but are having
      operational problems.  A national pilot for FRANCE (OPAX) has been
      put together, and it is hoped that once testing with their product,
      PIZARRO, is complete, they will join the pilot.  YUGOSLAVIA took
      delivery of QUIPU 6.7, and hopes to have something working soon.
      SPAIN hopes to have an operational service very shortly.  The UK
      has moved to extend its academic pilot to the commercial world,
      though support will not be provided by the JNT.
 
      (E) PTT Developments
 
      PTT Telecom (Netherlands), which is subcontracted to UCL is itself
      subcontracting to the Swiss and Finnish PTTs to provide project
      liaison with the other European PTTs.  The team has developed a
      long term action plan which includes an investigation (by means of
      a survey and interview) of the possible acceptance of X.500 within
      the European PTTs.  Their study will look at whether X.500 can be
      used as a basis of an operational commercial public service; all
      conclusions will be looked at with a view towards taking positive
      future action.  The exact relationship between X.500 and the TPH028
      protocol for interconnecting public telephony directories will also
      be investigated, with discussion of possible future migration.
      Also of some importance to future strategy is the development of
      valid accounting mechanisms; for X.500 these are an order of
      magnitude bigger than those for X.400.  The PTTs will be monitoring
      developments through ETSI.
 
      David Goodman (d.goodman@cs.ucl.ac.uk)
      PARADISE Project Manager
 
 PSI WHITE PAGES PILOT PROJECT
 -----------------------------
 
      As of May 5th, 1991 there were 76 sites under c=US, 68 of them
      operating as  PRDMDs.  New additions this month: University of
      Alaska Fairbanks, Auburn University.
 
      In order to test the next DIT naming scheme, the Directory was
      loaded with the US organizations from the UUMAP database (over 6000
      entries).  These are leaf organization objects under the
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 27]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      appropriate state.  This uncovered a new optimization for the UFN
      algorithm, which was subsequently coded.
 
      Marshall Rose (mrose@cheetah.ca.psi.com)
 
 REGISTRATION AUTHORITY COMMITTEE (ANSI USA RAC)
 -----------------------------------------------
 
      This committee (ANSI USA RAC) was formed by the ANSI ISSB
      (Information Systems Standards Board)
 
          "To serve as an advisory group to the Registration Coordinator
           with regards to technical or procedural questions and to serve
           as an appeals body."
 
      Members are appointed by the ISSB.
 
      It held its first meeting at ANSI offices in New York on 30 January
      1991, and its second meeting at Boulder, CO on 4 April 1991.
 
      At this point, after the second meeting, the USA RAC has approved
      its own operating rules, and has modified and approved the
      previously drafted procedures for registration of Alphanumeric Form
      Names and Numeric Form names under the ISO DCC arc { iso member-
      body US(840) }, which is also known by the numeric object
      identifier form "1 2 840".
 
      The following unofficial text describes the ANSI organization name
      registration service.
 
        The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has established
        an organization name registration service in line with the
        authority vested in ANSI as the U.S. member body of the
        International Standards Organization (ISO).  The service has been
        established in response to industry concerns for creating a U.S.
        national registry of organizational names whose value may be an
        integer or alpha-numeric characters.
 
        ANSI's service provides that once registered, the owner of the
        registered value must determine its usage and must take the
        appropriate action to encourage its use.  Potential usages are
        foreseen in the context of Open Systems Interconnection products
        and services.  Once registered, the value is asserted to be
        nationally unique within the context defined in ISO standards.
        For example, the values may be used in various computer network
        systems and services to identify entities of interest to users.
 
        A fee is collected for registration of both the numeric integer
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 28]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
        and alpha-numeric value.  The fees are designed to cover the
        costs incurred by ANSI in administering the registration
        authority.
 
        For further information and an application form, contact the
        Registration Coordinator (Beth Somerville), ANSI, 11 West 42nd
        Street, New York, NY 10036.  Phone 212 354 3300.  FAX 212-398-
        0023. (NOTE: This is a new address, but the same FAX and Phone
        numbers.)
 
      ANSI began registration of numeric name forms in January of 1991,
      and intends to begin registration of alpha-numeric name forms in
      May of 1991.
 
      In the meantime, ISO and CCITT actions have led to voting on a
      proposal to move the Object Identifier Tree that is allowed to have
      Alpha-numeric Name Forms as well as Numeric Name Forms from the ISO
      arc to the Joint-ISO-CCITT arc, since both ISO and CCITT standards
      and recommendations require alpha-numeric names for certain
      identifiers, such as for X.500 and X.400.  Only one among all the
      trees in the ISO and CCITT "forest" allows alpha-numeric values to
      be registered.
 
      It is expected that the vote will be affirmative, and that the
      current arc used by ANSI will then be moved to place it under the
      joint-iso-ccitt arc.  This of course means a change in all object
      identifiers currently formed by concatenation with the ANSI
      registered values.
 
      Another consequence of this action is that both the ISO member-body
      (ANSI) and the CCITT member-body (SG-D) for the U.S. will both have
      some jurisdiction over registration policies and procedures.  The
      processes of alignment and negotiation of joint control have begun
      with the exchange mutual recognition indications between ANSI and
      SG-D.  Fortunately there is a large overlap in the membership of
      both committees.
 
      So, stay tuned!  The good news is that something is happening.
      Unfortunately, the bad news is that something is happening.
 
      Einar Stefferud (stef@ics.uci.edu)
 
 SG-D MHS-MD
 -----------
 
      On the X.400 front, the CCITT member-body for the U.S. is the
      Department of State, which fulfills its CCITT member-body role by
      chairing the U.S. CCITT National Committee, which has subordinate
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 29]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      Study Groups (A, B, C, and D).  Study Group D (SG-D) is responsible
      for certain telecommunications areas, including X.400 and X.500
      services.  In response to industry concerns about registration of
      ADMD and PRMD names in the U.S., SG-D formed a new subcommittee
      (MHS-MD) to develop rules and procedures for MHS MD name
      registration and use.
 
      The MHS-MD committee has met twice since it was commissioned under
      a charter that was developed by an ad hoc MHS-MD group for
      consideration and adoption by SG-D.  The first official meeting was
      held at the U.S.  Department of State on 17-18 December 1990, and
      the second meeting in Scottsdale, AZ, on 7-8 March 1991.  The next
      meeting will be held on 6-7 June 1991, at the U.S. Department of
      State in Washington, DC.  Additional meetings are set for 16-17
      September 1991, and 6-7 December 1991.
 
      All meetings of the MHS-MD subcommittee are open to anyone doing
      business in the U.S. who has an interest in the issues before the
      subcommittee.  All outputs from the MHS-MD subcommittee are
      forwarded to SG-D for consideration and adoption, and are then
      passed on to the U.S. CCITT National Committee for ratification.
 
      Now, why, you ask, is the U.S. Department of State involved in such
      arcane technical matters in the telecommunication services area?
      Good question!  The answer is that in the U.S., where there are
      many telecommunication service providers, many of which provide
      international services with connections to service providers in
      other countries, someone has to be responsible for fulfillment of
      U.S.  treaty obligations under the ITU (International
      Telecommunications Union) treaties.
 
      Although, we in the U.S. do not consider packet switching or X.500
      or X.400 to be "basic telecommunication services" under the ITU
      treaties, the fact is that if any other country does make these
      services "basic" according to law, then the ITU treaties take
      effect and the U.S. Department of State must act to fulfill its
      treaty responsibilities under U.S. law for compliance with all
      applicable aspects of the ITU treaties.
 
      Under these treaties, all U.S. service providers are obligated to
      make arrangements such that any user in any foreign country can
      make a packet service connection or address X.400 mail to any user
      connected to a U.S. public service provider of those services, and
      expect the connection to be made, or the mail to be delivered,
      regardless of which U.S. service provider serves the addressed
      user.
 
      Thus, the U.S. Department of State has a vested interest in
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 30]
 
 Internet Monthly Report                                       April 1991
 
 
      assuring that there is a sufficient U.S. service provider
      "backbone" to support international connections to any user on any
      network in the U.S.
 
      For X.400, this starts with ADMD and PRMD Name Registration and
      ends with rules for how the ADMDs (public service providers) will
      voluntarily arrange to provide a suitable backbone operation for
      X.400 mail services.  It is expected that SG-D may have a similar
      interest in X.500 directory services.  Thus, it is encouraged to
      send copies of any contribution to ANSI or SG-D to the other.  Each
      has agreed to keep the other fully informed.
 
      The MHS-MD subcommittee is not as far along with its MD name
      registration procedures as the ANSI USA RAC, in part because it
      started work much later (ANSI procedures have been under
      development since 1988).  Another reason is that the problem is
      somewhat harder for X.400 because of the "real estate" problem: The
      restriction of ADMD/PRMD names to 16 characters of PrintableString
      and the requirement that these names form a single flat space of
      unique names for the entire c=US.
 
      Fortunately, X.500 does not force either of these restrictions on
      the choice of names for organizations registered under c=US.
 
      MHS-MD is now assembling its first draft for review and progression
      at its meeting in June, and we expect that a final draft will be
      available by the December meeting of this year.
 
      Einar Stefferud (stef@ics.uci.edu)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Westine                                                        [Page 31]