Internet-Draft SAS Framework March 2026
Feria Hernandez Expires 1 October 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-feria-sas-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
P. Feria Hernandez
Independent

Saturation Agentic Stridential (SAS): The Synthetic Noise Deluge of Autonomous Agents

Abstract

Autonomous computational agents are generating an increasing volume of high-frequency signals that lack human-anchored intent. This condition, termed Saturation Agentic Stridential (SAS), occurs when autonomous event generation dominates the system capacity.

This document proposes the Reality Layer (RL) as a deterministic pre-execution admission framework based on the NIST-validated Invariant Reality Prism (IRP-189). Using a binary sovereignty metric (R_sov), RL0 performs O(1) checks via a signed Reality Token (RT).

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 1 October 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Modern digital infrastructure faces a "Synthetic Noise Deluge" where autonomous signaling cycles consume resources ahead of traditional security layers. This document introduces SAS as a formal model to measure and mitigate this attrition.

2. Terminology

Saturation Agentic Stridential (SAS): A measurable state where the ratio of autonomous events to human events exceeds a stability threshold.

Structural Legitimacy: The property of a signal being causally linked to a human authority.

3. RL0: Admission State Machine

RL0 MUST implement the following deterministic sequence:

1. If RT absent          -> DROP
2. If signature invalid  -> DROP
3. If IRP(S) < 1.0       -> REJECT
4. Else                  -> ADMIT

4. Sovereignty Metric (IRP-189)

Derived from NIST OLIR IRP-189, the admissibility is defined as: R_sov = sigma_BIT * VC_ctx * Omega_env. Only signals where R_sov = 1 are admitted.

5. Security Considerations

RL0 prevents resource exhaustion by rejecting unauthorized signals in constant time (O(1)), protecting the compute boundary from machine-scale floods.

6. IANA Considerations

This document requests the provisional registration of the "Reality-Token" HTTP header field.

7. References

7.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

7.2. Informative References

[NIST-IRP-189]
NIST, "NIST CSF OLIR Catalog: Invariant Reality Prism (IRP-189)", .

Author's Address

Pablo Octavio Feria Hernandez
Independent