TidBITS#430/18-May-98
=====================

  So where is the future of the Mac OS? Geoff Duncan looks at
  Rhapsody, the Mac OS, and the path to Mac OS X. Also this week, we
  report on new QuickTime licensing policies, and Jeff Carlson takes
  special notice of Apple's snazzy new industrial designs. In the
  news, we note antitrust suits filed against Microsoft; releases of
  Internet Explorer 4.01, GoLive CyberStudio 3, AutoShare 2.3, and
  Adobe Photoshop 5; and bid a fond farewell to MacWEEK as we know
  it.

Topics:
    MailBITS/18-May-98
    Apple Revises QuickTime 3 Licensing
    Look Different: Excellence in Apple Design
    Mac OS X: Rhapsody a Mac Developer Could Love

<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-430.html>
<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/pub/tidbits/issues/1998/TidBITS#430_18-May-98.etx>

Copyright 1998 TidBITS Electronic Publishing. All rights reserved.
   Information: <info@tidbits.com> Comments: <editors@tidbits.com>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* APS Technologies -- 800/443-4199 -- <sales@apstech.com> -- How
   do you back up your APS hard drives? Try APS tape, removable,
   and CDR drives! Weekly specials at <http://www.apstech.com/>!

* Northwest Nexus -- 1 888-NWNEXUS -- <http://www.nwnexus.com/>
   Internet business solutions throughout the Pacific Northwest.

* Small Dog Electronics -- Improve your access - 56K Modem Sale!
   Global Village 56K with OS 8 and Free ITU V.90 upgrade: $115!
   TDK CyberExpress 5600 56K PC Card modem: $119
   For Details: <http://www.smalldog.com/#tid> -- 802/496-7171

* Cyberian Outpost -- the Cool Place to Shop for Computer Stuff! <- NEW!
   Lowest Prices on Photoshop 5.0! Full package: $579.95.
   Upgrade: $169.95. Order online or call 860/927-2050 x9228
   <http://www.tidbits.com/tbp/photoshop-5.html>

* Microsoft Office 98 Macintosh Edition -- Office applications <--- NEW!
   so Mac-like, it's unbelievable. Learn more about how Office 98
   perfectly unites Microsoft and the Mac. It's all happening at:
   <http://www.microsoft-ads.com/cgi-msads/macoffice/macoffice.pl>

* PHOTOSHOP GIF WEB TOOL: A must for busy Web creators, smartGIF <- NEW!
   exports Photoshop images as individual GIFs for cool effects!
   SALE! Get smartGIF today for only $89.95 (regularly $149).
   From SiteJazz: <http://www.digitalriver.com/sitejazz/tidbits>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

MailBITS/18-May-98
------------------

**Antitrust Lawsuits Filed Against Microsoft** -- After settlement
  talks collapsed this weekend, the United States Department of
  Justice and 20 states have filed closely related antitrust
  lawsuits against Microsoft. The lawsuits allege that Microsoft has
  illegally exploited its dominant position in operating systems to
  extend that dominance into the Internet software market. In
  addition, the lawsuit filed by the states accuses Microsoft of
  unfairly using its position to promote Microsoft Office at the
  expense of competitors. Microsoft has said that it will fight the
  charges in court, although Microsoft chairman Bill Gates also said
  the company is still open to settling. For more details, see
  ZDNet's "Special Report: U.S. v. Microsoft." [ACE]

<http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/special/msvdoj.html>


**Farewell MacWEEK, Welcome e/media Weekly** -- Mac Publishing
  announced that as of the 24-Aug-98 issue, MacWEEK will change its
  name to e/media Weekly (or Emedia Weekly, or EMedia Weekly,
  depending on the source you read). The 11-year-old magazine's new
  tag line will be "The Newsweekly for Digital Media Managers;" the
  title change is the final step in a shift to focus on digital
  media professionals, regardless of platform. e/media Weekly will
  keep its controlled circulation at 85,000 readers, 70 percent of
  whom reportedly work in multi-platform environments. According to
  a report from Matthew Rothenberg, director of online content for
  Mac Publishing, MacWEEK Online will remain in operation. [ACE]

<http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/980514/macweek_ma_1.html>
<http://www.macweek.com/>
<http://www.zdnet.com/macweek/mw_1219/nw_macweek.html>


**Internet Explorer 4.01: Faster, More Stable** -- Microsoft has
  released Internet Explorer 4.01, a must-have upgrade for Internet
  Explorer users. Although there's only a single new feature -
  support for Apple's ColorSync technology so specially created JPEG
  images are displayed exactly as their creators intended - Internet
  Explorer 4.01 incorporates numerous bug fixes and speed
  improvements. Program startup and overall page display performance
  has improved noticeably, and Microsoft claims enhanced Java
  performance as well. Stability is always hard to evaluate
  objectively, but in our testing, 4.01 crashes less often than 4.0
  did.

  Included in the Internet Explorer 4.01 package is Outlook Express
  4.01, which also sports performance improvements, bug fixes, plus
  a few new features. Outlook Express now provides support for
  outgoing rules, support for the StuffIt Engine, additional
  importing capabilities, and improved nickname support. The full
  combined download ranges from 12.6 MB to a whopping 29.2 MB,
  although if you download the Active Setup Installer (327K), you
  can choose which components you want to download and install.
  [ACE]

<http://www.microsoft.com/ie/mac/ie40/>
<http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/iebuild/ie401_mac/en/ie401_mac.htm>


**New Photoshop 5 Learns to Edit Type** -- It's taken several
  years, but finally Photoshop's Type tool behaves like... a Type
  tool! Photoshop 5, the new version of Adobe's undisputed leader
  among image-editing applications, began shipping last week with
  support for editable text; in previous versions, text entered in
  the Type dialog box was rasterized directly to pixels, which you
  then had to alter using Photoshop's image tools. Also featured in
  this release are multiple levels of undo and redo via the new
  History palette, enhanced color management, built-in support for
  spot-color channels, built-in layer effects (such as drop shadows
  and bevels), a more robust Actions palette capable of automating
  most of Photoshop's functions, and more. Upgrades are $199 (for
  the full version) and $299 (upgrading from the LE "light"
  version); the retail price is $999, although prices from companies
  like TidBITS sponsor Cyberian Outpost are significantly cheaper -
  see the sponsorship area above for details). Although the product
  officially shipped this week, Adobe is noting a four to six week
  backlog of orders, though reports are trickling in that a few
  users have begun receiving upgrades. [JLC]

<http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/photoshop/>


**CyberStudio 3 Goes Live** -- As the Web design industry evolves,
  companies offering Web page creation tools are discovering that
  designers want to build sites with WYSIWYG editors - and they also
  want to manipulate the resulting code by hand. GoLive's
  CyberStudio 3, released last week, delivers both approaches and
  more (see Tonya Engst's "Spinning the Web Part 4: CyberStudio" in
  TidBITS-387_). While building pages graphically, users can control
  how the HTML is formatted, add interactivity using pre-built
  JavaScript Actions, control Cascading Style Sheets and Dynamic
  HTML (DHTML) effects, and manage all of the assets of complex
  sites. GoLive CyberStudio 3 Professional Edition is available at
  an introductory price of $299 (normal price is $549). Owners of
  CyberStudio 2 can upgrade electronically for free if the product
  was bought after 01-Jan-98; customers who purchased any version
  prior to 01-Jan-98 can upgrade electronically for $99. A 30-day
  trial version can be downloaded (8.7 MB) or delivered on CD-ROM.
  [JLC]

<http://www.golive.com/three/cyberstudio/index.ehtml>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=02218>


**Apple Logo Losing Its Colors** -- Apple loyalists will no longer
  be able to claim they "bleed in six colors." According to Time,
  Apple is peeling away the six rainbow-colored bands from the Apple
  logo and replacing them with "white or another solid," such as
  blue for the iMac. Steve Jobs allegedly made the decision about
  seven months ago with his design, advertising, and marketing
  executives, saying that the colors echoed color schemes of the
  1970s and early 1980s. Likening the Apple logo to Nike's logo,
  Jobs said, "The shape is our swoosh." [JLC]

<http://www.pathfinder.com/time/magazine/1998/dom/980518/
notebook.the_scoop.showd34.html>


**AutoShare 2.3 Released** -- Mikael Hansen has released version
  2.3 of AutoShare, his freeware mailing list manager and
  autoresponder. The main new feature is support for the "-on" and
  "-off" addresses that we helped popularize with the TidBITS list
  for easy subscribing and unsubscribing. Other improvements in
  AutoShare 2.3 include support for unknown accounts and
  enhancements to the bounce module, plus minor improvements
  and bug fixes. The download is 1.7 MB. [ACE]

<http://www.dnai.com/~meh/autoshare/>


**Crossed Chips and Cables** -- In TidBITS-429_, the excitement of
  new PowerBooks and a forthcoming PalmPilot MacPac caused Managing
  Editor Jeff Carlson's personal wires to suffer a temporary short.
  It had been reported by many sources that the low-end processor
  for the PowerBook G3 series is a PowerPC 740 (See "Apple Hardware
  Strategy: Alluring PowerBooks and iMac"). In fact, Apple's
  Developer Note released last week confirms that all of the
  PowerBook models are running on the PowerPC 750 chip; the 233 MHz
  version's main difference is that it lacks a backside cache. As
  for the PalmPilot gaffe (see "Claris Organizer Reincarnated as
  PalmPilot MacPac"), several readers pointed out that the adapter
  offered in the MacPac enables you to connect to a Macintosh's
  serial port, not the ADB port. [JLC]

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=04880>
<http://gemma.apple.com/techpubs/hardware/Developer_Notes/
Macintosh_CPUs-PPC_Portable/PowerBookG3Series.pdf>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=04874>


Apple Revises QuickTime 3 Licensing
-----------------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <geoff@tidbits.com>

  In a move sure to be welcomed by developers and users, Apple has
  announced plans to revise QuickTime 3 licensing policies (see
  "Furor Over Developer Programs & QuickTime Licensing" in 
  TidBITS-425_). The original QuickTime 3 licensing agreement
  allowed royalty-free distribution, but only if developers copied
  a Get QuickTime Pro movie to the desktop each time their program
  launched. This requirement had been labeled "desktop spamming" and
  was widely criticized for creating technical support burdens as
  well as opportunities for Trojan horses. Apple also discontinued
  all licensing of QuickTime 2.x, leaving no option for products
  using QuickTime under Windows 3.1.

<http://developer.apple.com/mkt/registering/swl/swl.shtml>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=04821>

  The new QuickTime 3 licensing terms, which should be available
  along with new QuickTime 3.0 installers at the end of May, change
  the terms of QuickTime 3's royalty-free distribution such that
  developers must run the QuickTime 3 installer as part of their
  product's installation, or direct users to it if the product
  doesn't have an installer. The new QuickTime 3 installer will show
  an ad for QuickTime 3 Pro and copy the Get QuickTime Pro movie to
  the user's desktop _once_, rather than every time the product is
  launched. As before, products can include ad-free versions of
  QuickTime 3 or QuickTime 3 Pro for $1 or $2 per copy. In addition,
  Apple plans to revise the QuickTime Web browser plug-in so that it
  plays the Get QuickTime Pro movie (and copies it to the desktop)
  only the first time it's invoked, rather than every time. Apple
  has also introduced new licensing terms for QuickTime 2.1.2 for
  Windows, so if Windows products using QuickTime distribute
  QuickTime 3, they can include QuickTime 2.1.2 for Windows 3.1
  systems only.

  Although we applaud Apple for responding positively to the
  QuickTime 3 licensing debacle, the problems with the original
  policies and (more importantly) the distrust and animosity they
  generated during the last several weeks could have been avoided
  altogether if Apple hadn't acted unilaterally.


Look Different: Excellence in Apple Design
------------------------------------------
  by Jeff Carlson <jeffc@tidbits.com>

  If you've seen pictures of Apple's new iMac, you probably didn't
  start talking about its G3 processor or USB ports. No,
  conversations about the new consumer Mac sound more like: "It's an
  X-Wing pilot's helmet." "It's a half-melted blue gumdrop on its
  side." "A big lozenge?" "You know, a roundy-looking,
  marshmallowish, translucent glob for the rest of us."

<http://www.apple.com/pr/photos/iMac/iMacphotos.html>

  Although it's been only a short time since the iMac's
  introduction, the machine is already on people's minds - without
  the benefit of hands-on experience, application-specific
  benchmarks, or formal product reviews; the little computer isn't
  even shipping for another 90 days. Macintosh retailers have even
  reported increased traffic from customers asking about the iMac.
  Why the excitement? Good, unique industrial design.


**Look Different** -- For the most part, the computer industry has
  put little effort into industrial design. Most computers are
  boring, beige boxes that emphasize specifications over appearance.
  As long as the job gets done, who cares what it looks like? Is it
  any wonder that many PCs get stuck beneath desks?

  In 1984, the original Macintosh captured people's imagination
  partly because of its friendly, all-in-one design. With its
  rounded edges, slightly angled front, and built-in handle, the Mac
  became an information-age device you wanted to touch and weren't
  afraid to use. Time Magazine named it 1984's "Design of the Year."
  (For a visual history of Apple industrial design, both shipping
  and conceptual works, check out the book AppleDesign, by Paul
  Kunkel and Rick English.)

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1888001259/tidbitselectro00A>

  Good design invariably makes a product stand apart from the crowd.
  Although the new PowerBook G3 series was also introduced on the
  same day as the iMac - featuring a downright beautiful design that
  laughs at rectilinear PC laptops - it was the iMac's completely
  different, almost organic (if you consider translucent blue to be
  organic) form factor that appeared in headlines and around water
  coolers the next day.

<http://www.apple.com/powerbook/gallery.html>


**Work Different** -- Striking design prompts discussion (how many
  people do you know who have asked, "What do you think of the
  blob?"), and generates valuable word-of-mouth, the best marketing
  in existence. But good design is also its own communication
  between company and consumer; it demonstrates that a company is
  interested in how its customer uses and feels about the product,
  and that it is willing to expend the resources necessary to
  improve that experience. This is apparent not only in how sleek,
  or eye-catching, or creative something appears, but in how it's
  used.

  Steve Jobs said at his Worldwide Developer Conference keynote that
  he "found the best industrial design group in the world at Apple,"
  and their attention to detail is apparent in the new designs. The
  new PowerBooks, for example, are more than attractive: they're the
  easiest PowerBooks to open to perform RAM or hard drive upgrades;
  the expansion bay modules employ levers to eject batteries and
  storage devices; the rear door is spring loaded and feels more
  durable than previous models (it just might stay attached for the
  long run). Similarly, the desktop G3 models, like the Power Mac
  7500 design, open easily for user-installable upgrades. If you've
  ever had to install a modem or hard drive into most PCs, you'll
  appreciate the lack of hand-gymnastics required to connect such
  devices.

  This kind of detail doesn't go unnoticed, and no doubt contributes
  to owners' allegiance to their Macintoshes. It used to be that a
  rectangular metal box was perfectly acceptable for a computer, but
  no more. Apple is demonstrating that design counts, and I'm
  willing to bet that buyers will agree in volume.


Mac OS X: Rhapsody a Mac Developer Could Love
---------------------------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <geoff@tidbits.com>

  Last week during his keynote address at Apple's Worldwide
  Developers Conference, Steve Jobs outlined Apple's plans for Mac
  OS 8 and Rhapsody and introduced two new elements: the Carbon API
  and Mac OS X ("Ten"). As WWDC unfolded, Apple revealed more
  information about Mac OS X and future operating system plans.
  Although many unanswered questions remain, enough detail is
  available to begin analyzing Apple's OS plans.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=04881>


**The Lineage of Mac OS X** -- Although this is an
  oversimplification, Mac OS X is best described as an enhanced
  version of Rhapsody, Apple's forthcoming operating system derived
  from NeXT's OpenStep technology. Rhapsody is based on the Mach
  microkernel and runs a version of BSD Unix under the hood,
  although it hides the Unix command line unless the user
  specifically asks for it. Also included is the "Blue Box,"
  essentially a Rhapsody application that runs the Mac OS and thus
  Mac OS applications, although those applications don't receive the
  benefits of the modern Rhapsody OS, like memory protection and
  preemptive multitasking.

  Rhapsody also includes the Yellow Box, a sophisticated application
  environment. Mac OS applications would have to be rewritten to
  take advantage of the Yellow Box, but in doing so would become
  "first class citizens" under Rhapsody, gaining the advantages of
  the new operating system. In addition, developers would be able to
  recompile Yellow Box applications for versions of the Yellow Box
  which run on Intel-based systems or even under the old Mac OS.
  These capabilities would, arguably, make the Yellow Box the best
  choice for cross-platform development. Rhapsody also supports
  Java, so Java applications under Rhapsody reap the full benefits
  of the operating system.

  So, essentially Rhapsody can run four kinds of programs:

* Mac OS (via the Blue Box)
* Java
* Yellow Box
* BSD Unix

  Mac OS X adds to this picture. Mac OS X will still be based on the
  Mach microkernel (version 3), and will also run BSD Unix under the
  hood and feature a Blue Box that will run most existing Mac OS
  applications, although without the advanced features of the new
  operating system. And, Mac OS X will still include Java support
  and the Yellow Box.

  The problem that Apple - and Macintosh developers - encountered
  with Rhapsody was that to gain the benefits of a modern operating
  system, developers had to rewrite their applications for the
  Yellow Box from scratch. So, Apple has introduced the Carbon API,
  a large subset of the existing Mac OS system services that will be
  fully supported under Mac OS X. Programs written to the Carbon API
  gain all the benefits of a modern operating system, but don't need
  to have their Mac OS source code entirely rewritten. According to
  Apple, typical Mac OS applications would need a 10 percent tune-up
  to become a "carbon life form." In addition, Apple plans to
  release Carbon as a set of libraries for the current Mac OS 8.x,
  so "carbon life forms" can run under Mac OS X _and_ under future
  derivations of Mac OS 8 without alteration.

  So, Mac OS X will be able to run five kinds of programs:

* Mac OS (via the Blue Box)
* Java
* Yellow Box
* BSD Unix
* Carbon

  Architecturally, Mac OS X is essentially the same as Rhapsody: the
  difference is that it's allowing a much simpler (and more
  practical) means for current Mac OS developers to make their
  programs first class citizens.


**What's In & What's Out... For Now** -- In addition to the
  primary features of Rhapsody, Apple also elaborated on some of the
  components of Mac OS X at WWDC.

* Blue Box applications will run alongside other Mac OS X
  applications, rather than the Blue Box being accessible only via a
  full-screen mode or within a separate window. This is a key point
  for the usability of Blue Box applications, although it may lead
  to some user confusion about which applications are running in the
  Blue Box, which are not, and what the differences might be.

* Mac OS X will not have a 68K emulator, although (presumably) the
  Blue Box within Mac OS X  will contain an emulator in order to run
  current Mac OS applications. Mac OS X will be fully PowerPC-
  native.

* Display Postscript, a much-ballyhooed feature of OpenStep and
  Rhapsody, will _not_ be present in Mac OS X since Adobe has ceased
  development of Display PostScript. Instead, Apple says it will
  support a PostScript-like imaging model in Mac OS X and replace
  the default EPS image format used in OpenStep with Adobe's PDF
  format. Apple also says it will be adding GX-like capabilities to
  both QuickDraw and Mac OS X's typographic features. Unfortunately,
  QuickDraw GX will be dead under Mac OS X and Carbon, which is a
  shame since it's considerably more advanced than anything Adobe
  has to offer and Apple owns it.

* Mac OS X will include full scripting support for Carbon, Yellow
  Box, Java, and Mac OS applications.

* Apple says full-featured cryptographic technologies will be
  included in Mac OS X, along with utilities resembling the digital
  signature manager and keychain that originally appeared with
  PowerTalk in System 7 Pro.

* Although Apple has been emphatic about releasing libraries to
  enable Mac OS 8.x to run Carbon applications, Apple hasn't been
  clear about whether it will live up to last year's big WWDC
  promise to release the Yellow Box for Mac OS 8.x.

* Mac OS X will be "optimized" for PowerPC G3 systems; it's not
  clear whether Mac OS X will support earlier PowerPC 603- or 604-
  based machines.

  A perusal through Apple's preliminary specification for the Carbon
  API reveals that some programs will be harder to port to Mac OS X
  than others. Extensions as we know them won't exist under Mac OS X
  - although they apparently can load under the Blue Box and thus
  only be available to Blue Box applications, which could lead to a
  confusing user experience. It's not clear what sort of mechanism
  Apple will provide under Mac OS X to replace extensions. In
  addition, any program that accesses hardware directly - like
  Ethernet or PC Cards - will need to be revised to run under Carbon
  since hardware access is the exclusive province of the Mac OS X
  operating system. Apple hasn't made decisions on the extent to
  which some technologies like Game Sprockets, Speech, and the Power
  Manager will be supported in Carbon.

  You can check out session notes from WWDC online, although,
  unfortunately, much of this material consists of large JPEG images
  of session slides. Apple's preliminary Carbon specification is
  also available (in PDF format) from Apple's Mac OS X developer
  site.

<http://www.developer.com/calendar/minisites/wwdc98/>
<http://developer.apple.com/macosx/>


**What About Intel?** A big question on the minds of some
  developers is the fate of Yellow Box for Intel, a set of Windows
  95/NT libraries that allow applications written for the Yellow Box
  to run on the Windows platform with virtually no fuss. According
  to Apple, the Intel version of Yellow Box is alive and well, but
  the Intel runtime will _not_ be freely distributable, in
  contradiction to what Apple said at WWDC in 1997. Reportedly
  per-copy royalty fees will be small (in the $20 arena) and Apple
  is working on the situation, but the fact there's a fee at all
  could pose a major problem for developers who are trying to do
  cross-platform development work for Rhapsody or Mac OS X.

  Another common question is whether Apple plans to develop Mac OS X
  for Intel processors: for now, the answer is no. Although the
  Mach/BSD underpinnings of Mac OS X could be made to run on Intel
  hardware - and Carbon does not require Macintosh ROMs - all
  reports indicate Apple has no plans to port either the Blue Box or
  Carbon to Intel processors.


**Schedule in a Nutshell** -- Here, then, is Apple's current
  schedule of operating system releases, along with their lineage,
  key features, and requirements.

* Q3 1998: Mac OS 8.5, codenamed Allegro. A major revision derived
  from the current Mac OS 8.1 release, which features PowerPC-native
  AppleScript; HTML-based help (and the V-Twin text search engine)
  in Apple Guide; anti-aliased text capabilities; appearance
  "themes"; Internet Config 2.0; new Navigation Services; and
  numerous interface enhancements. Mac OS 8.5 will be available only
  for PowerPC systems.

* Q3 1998: Rhapsody 1.0. Derived from OpenStep technologies
  acquired from NeXT. Features: Mach kernel running BSD Unix; Blue
  Box for running Mac OS applications, Yellow Box for Rhapsody
  applications, plus Java. Intended for publishing and server
  markets; should require a PCI-based PowerPC system.

* Q1 1999: Mac OS 8.6(?). Incremental update to Mac OS 8.5;
  support for new CPUs, bug fixes. PowerPC systems only.

* Q1 1999: First developer seeds of Mac OS X.

* Q3 1999: Mac OS 9(?), codenamed Sonata. Major update to the
  Mac OS.

* Q3 1999: Mac OS X. Features a Mach 3.0 kernel running BSD Unix;
  support for Mac OS 8 programs via Blue Box, Carbon, Java, and
  Yellow Box. Optimized for PowerPC G3 systems.

  Note that the current release schedule calls for Mac OS X to
  appear at the same time as a major update to the existing Mac OS,
  indicating Apple anticipates a transitional period where both Mac
  OS X and future versions of the current Mac OS will be available
  to consumers. It's not clear how Apple plans to differentiate
  between these releases, but it's likely Mac OS X, like Rhapsody,
  will be initially targeted at the high end of the Macintosh market
  - publishing, media production, servers, and power users - while
  users with older machines or smaller budgets can continue to
  update their systems with improved versions of the old Mac OS,
  sans all the Rhapsody technology.


**What Will Developers Do?** It's difficult to look into Apple's
  operating system future. Mac OS X won't ship for about a year and
  a half; considering that a year and a half ago, the Mac
  development world was in a tizzy about the BeOS, take all
  predictions with a grain of salt.

  Although Rhapsody offers key technologies the Macintosh needs in
  an operating system along with several compelling features, few
  developers are enthusiastic about rewriting applications from the
  ground up. Until now, most figured they'd let Rhapsody's Blue Box
  support their current Mac OS programs, then see what happened.
  After all, if they were going to rewrite from scratch, why not
  rewrite for Windows NT, which already exists and has an expanding
  market share?

  With Mac OS X, however, Apple's message to its developers is much
  more palatable: most programs will need only minor revisions to
  conform to the Carbon API, and developers can continue to use
  their current Mac OS programming expertise under Mac OS X.
  Increasingly, the transition from Mac OS 8 to Carbon is being
  compared with the transition from 68K to PowerPC: difficult for
  some programs, but not bad for most. Not surprisingly, Metrowerks
  - the company that almost single-handedly made it possible for Mac
  developers to produce PowerPC applications five years ago - has
  announced it will fully support Carbon in its forthcoming
  CodeWarrior releases (withdrawing its similar Latitude technology
  for Rhapsody). Although Mac OS X won't ship until a year after
  Rhapsody's debut, it stands a better chance of widespread
  developer adoption.

<http://www.metrowerks.com/db/Press.qry?function=PR&rowid=148>

  However, the introduction of the Carbon API in Mac OS X paints a
  large question mark on the future of the Yellow Box. Although
  Carbon brings more developers and applications to Mac OS X, those
  developers aren't any more likely to rewrite their applications
  for the Yellow Box than they were a year ago. Apple is telling
  developers any new development should be done for the Yellow Box,
  especially if the developers intend to release Windows versions of
  those programs. However, if developers must pay a licensing fee
  for Yellow Box applications on Intel hardware and Apple backs away
  from its promise to release Yellow Box for the Mac OS, programming
  for the Yellow Box might become purely an intellectual pursuit.


$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 This file is formatted as setext. For more information send email
 to <setext@tidbits.com>. A file will be returned shortly.

 For information: how to subscribe, where to find back issues,
 and more, email <info@tidbits.com>. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <editors@tidbits.com>
 Back issues available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/>
 And: <ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/pub/tidbits/issues/>
 Full text searching available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
 -------------------------------------------------------------------


