Newsgroups: rec.games.int-fiction
Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!xcs.contex.com!marvin.contex.com!liz
From: liz@marvin.contex.com (Elizabeth Cyr Jones)
Subject: Re: Planetfall Sequel
Message-ID: <CFKF3u.Irp@contex.com>
Sender: usenet@contex.com (News Owner)
Nntp-Posting-Host: marvin.contex.com
Organization: Xyvision Design Systems, Wakefield, MA
References: <activisCF9vzp.7q2@netcom.com> <)> <2a8dvuINNitl@life.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1993 16:57:29 GMT
Lines: 25

In article <2a8dvuINNitl@life.ai.mit.edu>,
David Baggett <dmb@ai.mit.edu> wrote:
>I thought that rec.games.int-fiction readers might find this post in
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure interesting:
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>In article <activisCF9vzp.7q2@netcom.com> activis@netcom.com (ActiVision) writes:
>>We're working on a sequel to PlanetFall.  Look for it in about 1 year.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>William Volk (Activision)
[Dave's .sig deleted-sorry Dave]
If ActiVision is working on a sequel to Planetfall, then shouldn't it really
be an intraquel, since Stationfall - the original sequel to Planetfall - 
already exists?  Further, since all they build is shlocky stuff anyway,
they should just let Infocom R.I.P. and try to develop their own ideas.

Harumph.

liz jones
avid (rabid) Info-fan



