<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.39 (Ruby 3.2.3) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-li-lsvr-bgp-spf-srv6-06" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.34.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="BGP-SPF SRv6">Applying BGP-LS Segment Routing over IPv6(SRv6) Extensions to BGP-LS-SPF</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-li-lsvr-bgp-spf-srv6-06"/>
    <author initials="L." surname="Zhang" fullname="Li Zhang">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>
          <city>Beijing</city>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>zhangli344@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="J." surname="Dong" fullname="Jie Dong">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>
          <city>Beijing</city>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>jie.dong@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="K." surname="Patel" fullname="Keyur Patel">
      <organization>Arrcus, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>United States of America</country>
        </postal>
        <email>keyur@arrcus.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="J." surname="Li" fullname="Jiawei Li">
      <organization>China Satellite Network Innovation Research Institute Co., Ltd.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>lijw3@chinasatnet.com.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="X." surname="Zhang" fullname="Xiaoqiu Zhang">
      <organization>China Mobile</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>zhangxiaoqiu@chinamobile.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2026" month="July" day="06"/>
    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>LSVR</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 69?>

<t>For network scenarios such as Massively Scaled Data Centers (MSDCs), BGP is extended for Link-State (LS) distribution and
the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm based calculation. BGP Link State Shortest Path First (BGP-LS-SPF) Routing leverages the mechanisms of both BGP protocol and
BGP-LS protocol extensions. Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) provides a source routing mechanism that allows a flow to
be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SRv6
domain. In some networks, it may be useful to enable SRv6 based source routing mechanism together with BGP-LS-SPF. This
document proposes to introduce the BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions for SRv6 to the BGP-LS-SPF SAFI to enable SRv6 capabilities in BGP-LS-SPF. The usages and formats of these extensions are also provided in this document.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 78?>

<section anchor="intro">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t><xref target="RFC9815"/> extends BGP for Link-State (LS) distribution and the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm based
calculation. BGP Link State Shortest Path First (BGP-LS-SPF) Routing leverages the mechanisms of both BGP protocol <xref target="RFC4271"/> and BGP-LS protocol extensions
<xref target="RFC9552"/>, with the extensions to BGP-LS attribute and new NLRI selection rules.</t>
      <t>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within various topologies by
encoding paths as sequences of topological or functional sub-paths called "segments". SRv6 provides a mechanism that
allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress
node(s) to the SRv6 domain.</t>
      <t><xref target="RFC9085"/> defines extensions to the BGP-LS to carry SR information. <xref target="RFC9514"/> further defines extensions to BGP-LS to advertise SRv6 segments along with their behaviors and other attributes via BGP.</t>
      <t>In network scenarios such as Data Center networks, WAN networks or other networks where BGP-LS-SPF can be used as the
underlay routing protocol, it may be useful to enable SRv6 based source routing mechanism for traffic engineering and optimization.</t>
      <t>This document proposes to introduce the BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions for SRv6 to the BGP-LS-SPF SAFI to enable SRv6 capabilities in BGP-LS-SPF. The usages and formats of these extensions are also provided in this document.</t>
      <section anchor="requirements-language">
        <name>Requirements Language</name>
        <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
        <?line -18?>

</section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-node-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 Node Attribute TLVs</name>
      <t>The following SRv6 Node Attributes TLVs described in <xref target="RFC9514"/> are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab1">
        <name>Node Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1138</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 Capabilities TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">266</td>
            <td align="left">Node MSD TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 8814</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1035</td>
            <td align="left">SR Algorithm TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9085</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>These SRv6 Node Attributes TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
      <section anchor="srv6-capabilities-tlv">
        <name>SRv6 Capabilities TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 Capabilities TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to announce the SRv6 capabilities of the node along with the
BGP-LS Node NLRI and indicates the SRv6 support by the node.</t>
        <t>For BGP-LS-SPF, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV for a BGP-LS-SPF node to advertise its support for the SRv6-related capabilities.
This is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI that
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Capabilities TLVs
are received from a given node, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
        <t>If no SRv6 Capabilities TLV is advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI, then it indicates that the originator of this
NLRI does not support SRv6.</t>
        <t>The format and flags of SRv6 Capabilities TLV of BGP-LS-SPF is consistent with that in BGP-LS. The format of BGP-LS-SPF
SRv6 Capability TLV is shown as follow:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig1">
          <name>SRv6 Capability TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Flags             |            Reserved           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1038</t>
        <t>Length: 4</t>
        <t>Flags: 2-octet field. the following flags are defined:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
0                   1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |O|       Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>O-flag: If set, the node supports use of the O-bit in the SRH, as defined in <xref target="RFC9259"/>.</t>
        <t>Other flags are not defined and are reserved for future use. They <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Reserved: 2-octet field that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="Node-MSD">
        <name>SRv6 Node MSD Types</name>
        <t>The Node MSD TLV defined in <xref target="RFC8814"/> is used to advertise the limits and the Segment Routing Header (SRH) operations supported by the SRv6-capable node in BGP-LS.</t>
        <t>For BGP-LS-SPF, different SRv6-capable node may have different limits related to SRH processing, therefore, BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV for nodes to advertise the limits and operations.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 Node MSD TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Node MSD TLVs are received from a given node, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
        <t>The MSD types for SRv6 that are defined in <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/> for IS-IS are also used by BGP-LS-SPF. These MSD types are allocated in the "IGP MSD-Types" registry maintained by IANA and are shared by IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF. They are described in the subsections below.</t>
        <t>The format of this TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig2">
          <name>SRv6 Node MSD TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |              Type             |             Length            |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |    MSD-Type   |  MSD-Value    |  MSD-Type...  |  MSD-Value... |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 266.</t>
        <t>Length: variable, represents the total length of the value field in octets.</t>
        <t>Value: consists of one or more pairs of a 1-octet MSD-Type and 1-octet MSD-Value. The detail description of MSD-Type and MSD-Value is in <xref section="3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8814"/>.</t>
        <t>Node MSD is the smallest MSD supported by the node on the set of interfaces configured for use by the advertising BGP-LS-SPF instance.  MSD values may be learned via a hardware API or may be provisioned.</t>
        <t>If there are multiple MSD-Types that have the same code point in a Node MSD TLV, then the Node MSD TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <section anchor="maximum-segments-left-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum Segments Left MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum Segments Left MSD Type signals the maximum value of the Segments Left field in the SRH of a received packet before applying the Endpoint behavior associated with a SID.</t>
          <t>If no value is advertised, the supported value is assumed to be 0.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="maximum-end-pop-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum End Pop MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum End Pop MSD Type signals the maximum number of SIDs in the SRH to which the node can apply "Penultimate Segment Pop (PSP) of the SRH" or "Ultimate Segment Pop (USP) of the SRH" behaviors, which defined in <xref section="4.16" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
          <t>If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the node cannot apply the PSP or USP flavors.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="maximum-hencaps-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type signals the maximum number of SIDs that can be added as part of the H.Encaps behavior as defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
          <t>If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the headend can apply an SR Policy that only contains one segment without inserting any SRH.</t>
          <t>A non-zero SRH Max H.Encaps MSD indicates that the headend can insert an SRH with SIDs up to the advertised value.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="maximum-end-d-msd-type">
          <name>Maximum End D MSD Type</name>
          <t>The Maximum End D MSD Type specifies the maximum number of SIDs present in an SRH when performing decapsulation. These include, but are not limited to, End.DX6, End.DT4, End.DT46, End with USD, and End.X with USD as defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
          <t>If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the node cannot apply any behavior that results in decapsulation and forwarding of the inner packet when the outer IPv6 header contains an SRH.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sr-algorithm-tlv">
        <name>SR-Algorithm TLV</name>
        <t><xref target="RFC9514"/> specifies that the algorithm support for SRv6 is advertised via the SR-Algorithm TLV specified in <xref target="RFC9085"/>. The SR-Algorithm is used to advertise the SR algorithms supported by the node.</t>
        <t>This TLV is a basic TLV of SR and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be supported in BGP-LS-SPF. The SR-Algorithm TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. If a node receiving multiple SR-Algorithm TLVs in the BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.</t>
        <t>If a SRv6-capable node does not advertise the SR-Algorithm TLV, it implies that algorithm 0 is the only algorithm supported by the node.</t>
        <t>If the originating node does advertise the SR-Algorithm sub-TLV, then algorithm 0 <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present while non-zero algorithms <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be present.</t>
        <t>The format of Algorithm fields in this TLV is consistent with that in BGP-LS, as defined in <xref section="2.1.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9085"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig3">
          <name>SRv6 Algorithm TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |   Type        |     Length    |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Algorithm 1   |  Algorithm 2  | Algorithm ... |  Algorithm n  |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1035</t>
        <t>Length: Variable</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1 octet of algorithm.</t>
        <t>The algorithm values are allocated in the "IGP Algorithm Type" registry defined in <xref target="RFC8665"/>, these values are shared by IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-sids-and-reachability">
      <name>SRv6 SIDs and Reachability</name>
      <t>An SRv6 SID is 128 bits and consists of locator, function, and argument parts as described in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
      <t>An BGP-LS-SPF router is provisioned with algorithm-specific locators for each algorithm supported by that router. Each locator is a covering prefix for all SIDs provisioned on that router that have the matching algorithm.</t>
      <t>Locators <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised as BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI objects along with the SRv6 Locator TLVs (see <xref target="locator"/>) in its BGP-LS-SPF Attribute. Forwarding entries for the locators advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be installed in the forwarding plane of receiving SRv6-capable routers when the associated algorithm is supported by the receiving BGP-LS-SPF router. The processing of the prefix of the Locator, the calculation of its reachability, and the installation in the forwarding plane follows the process of BGP-LS-SPF <xref target="RFC9815"/>.</t>
      <t>SRv6 SIDs are advertised as SRv6 SID Information TLVs (see <xref target="SID-info"/>) in the SRv6 SID NLRI, except for SRv6 SIDs that are associated with a specific neighbor/link and are therefore advertised as SRv6 End.X SID TLV (see <xref target="end.x-sid"/>).</t>
      <t>SRv6 SIDs received from other nodes are not directly routable and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be installed in the forwarding plane. Reachability to SRv6 SIDs depends upon the existence of a covering locator.</t>
      <t>Adherence to the rules defined in this section will ensure that SRv6 SIDs associated with a supported algorithm will be forwarded correctly, while SRv6 SIDs associated with an unsupported algorithm will be dropped.</t>
      <t>NOTE: The drop behavior depends on the absence of a default/summary route covering a given locator.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-link-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 Link Attribute TLVs</name>
      <t>The following Link Attributes described in <xref target="RFC9514"/> and <xref target="RFC9085"/> are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab2">
        <name>Link Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1106</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 End.X SID TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1106</td>
            <td align="left">L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9085</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">267</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 Link MSD TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 8814</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>These SRv6 Link Attribute TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI.</t>
      <section anchor="end.x-sid">
        <name>SRv6 End.X SID TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 End.X SID TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the SRv6 SIDs associated with an IGP Adjacency SID behavior that correspond to a point-to-point or point-to-multipoint link or adjacency of the node running the IS-IS or OSPFv3 protocols. It is also used by BGP-LS to advertise the BGP EPE Peer Adjacency SID for SRv6 on the same lines as specified for SR-MPLS in <xref target="RFC9086"/>.</t>
        <t>BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to advertise the SRv6 SIDs correspond to a point-to-point or adjacency of the node running the BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 End.X SID TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Link Attribute that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>More than one instance of this TLV (one for each SRv6 End.X SID) can be included in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute. Multiple SRv6 End.X SID TLVs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be associated with the same adjacency.</t>
        <t>Every SRv6-enabled node <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> instantiate at least one unique SRv6 End.X SID corresponding to each of its neighbors, although it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> omit doing so if features like TE or TI-LFA that require End.X SID are not in use.</t>
        <t>All End.X SIDs <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a subnet of a locator with matching algorithm that is advertised by the same BGP-LS-SPF node in an SRv6 Locator TLV. End.X SIDs that do not meet this requirement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored. This ensures that the BGP-LS-SPF node advertising the End.X is also advertising its corresponding locator with the algorithm that will be used for computing paths destined to the SID.</t>
        <t>The format of this TLV is the same as in BGP-LS:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig4">
          <name>SRv6 End.X SID TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|        Endpoint Behavior      |      Flags    |   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|     Weight    |   Reserved    |  SID (16 octets) ...          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)             | Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1106</t>
        <t>Length: variable</t>
        <t>Endpoint Behavior: 2-octet field. The Endpoint behavior code point for this SRv6 SID as defined in Section 10.2 of <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
        <t>Flags: 1 octet. The definition of flags are same as that in IS-IS SRv6 End.X SID sub-TLV (<xref section="8.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/>) and the OSPFv3 SRv6 End.X SID sub-TLV (<xref section="9.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9513"/>).</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID. The algorithm associated with the SRv6 Locator from which the SID is allocated.</t>
        <t>Weight: 1-octet field. The value represents the weight of the SID for the purpose of load balancing. The use of the weight is defined in <xref target="RFC8402"/>.</t>
        <t>Reserved: 1-octet field that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>SID: 16-octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID as a 128-bit value.</t>
        <t>Sub-TLVs: Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional attributes for the specific SRv6 SID.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="l2-bundle-member-attributes-tlv">
        <name>L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV</name>
        <t>The L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV is defined in <xref target="RFC9085"/>, it identifies an L2 Bundle Member link, which in turn is
associated with a parent L3 link. This TLV is useful when entities external to BGP-LS-SPF wish to control traffic flows
on the individual physical links that comprise the Layer 2 interface bundle.</t>
        <t>The network deployed BGP-LS-SPF may include trunk links. Therefore, BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support this TLV to advertise L2 bundle
member link attributes.</t>
        <t>The L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Link Attribute with BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> include sub-TLVs that describe attributes associated with the bundle member. The identified bundle member
represents a unidirectional path from the originating node to the neighbor specified in the parent L3 link.</t>
        <t>Multiple L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLVs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be associated with a BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI.</t>
        <t>Advertisement of this TLV implies that the identified link is a member of the L2 Bundle associated with the Parent L3
Link, and the member link is operationally up. Therefore, advertisements <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be withdrawn if the link becomes operationally
down or it is no longer a member of the identified L2 Bundle.</t>
        <t>The format of this TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS:</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig5">
          <name>L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                     L2 Bundle Member Descriptor               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Link Attribute Sub-TLVs(variable)          //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1172</t>
        <t>Length: Variable.</t>
        <t>L2 Bundle Member Descriptor: 4-octet field that carries a link-local identifier as defined in <xref target="RFC4202"/>.</t>
        <t>Link attribute Sub-TLVs: variable, the detail description of these Sub-TLVs is specified in <xref section="2.2.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9085"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="srv6-link-msd-types">
        <name>SRv6 Link MSD Types</name>
        <t>The Link MSD TLV defined in <xref target="RFC8814"/> is used to advertise the limits and the SRH operations supported on the specific link by the SRv6-capable node. BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to advertise the limits and operations supported on the specific link to enable segment routing. The SRv6 MSD types specified in <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/> are also used with the BGP-LS-SPF Link MSD TLV, as these code points are shared between the IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 Node MSD TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Link Attributes that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Link MSD TLVs are received from a given node, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI.</t>
        <t>The format and different MSD Types of SRv6 Link MSD TLV is the same as <xref target="Node-MSD"/>, the Type of Link MSD TLV is 267<xref target="RFC8814"/>.</t>
        <t>In addition to link MSD, the link MTU also should be considered during SRv6 TE path calculation and forwarding to avoid oversized packets</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-prefix-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 Prefix Attribute TLVs</name>
      <t>The following BGP-LS SRv6 Prefix Attributes introduced in <xref target="RFC9514"/> are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab3">
        <name>Prefix Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1162</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 Locator TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>These SRv6 Prefix Attribute TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI.</t>
      <section anchor="locator">
        <name>SRv6 Locator TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 Locator TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the locators supported by each node.  Locator is the key component of SRv6 SID, BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to enable segment routing.</t>
        <t>A node is provisioned with one or more locators supported by that node. Locators are covering prefixes for the set of SIDs provisioned on that node. If more than one locator is provisioned for a node, then each locator is advertised as an individual BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI object along with the SRv6 Locator TLV in its BGP-LS-SPF Attribute.</t>
        <t>Only one SRv6 Locator TLVs <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute, associating with the BGP-LS-SPF prefix NLRI.</t>
        <t>This TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised only once in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI.</t>
        <t>When multiple SRv6 Locator TLVs are received from a given node in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV.</t>
        <t>The format of the SRv6 Locator TLV is the same as BGP-LS<xref section="5.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9514"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig6">
          <name>SRv6 Locator TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      Flags    |   Algorithm   |           Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                            Metric                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1162</t>
        <t>Length: variable</t>
        <t>Flags: 1 octet of flags. Currently, the flags field is not used and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID, as defined in the "IGP Algorithm Types" registry <xref target="RFC8665"/>.</t>
        <t>Reserved: 2-octet field. The value <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Metric: 4-octet field. The value of the metric for the locator.</t>
        <t>Sub-TLVs: Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional attributes for the given SRv6 Locator.  Currently, none are defined.</t>
        <t>Since <xref target="RFC9815"/> specifies that the Prefix Metric (TLV 1155) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be advertised associated with the prefix NLRI to be considered for route calculation, therefore the Metric field in this TLV is no longer usable. The Metric field in this TLV <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be set to 0 and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-sid-nlri">
      <name>SRv6 SID NLRI</name>
      <t>The SRv6 SID NLRI defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to carry the SRv6 SID information. When SRv6 SIDs need to be advertised in BGP-SPF, the following NLRI type and attributes TLV for SRv6 SID are applicable to BGP-LS-SPF SAFI:</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab4">
        <name>SRv6 SID NLRI with BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Type</th>
            <th align="left">NLRI Type</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">6</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 SID NLRI</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">518</td>
            <td align="left">SRv6 SID Information TLV</td>
            <td align="left">RFC 9514</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <t>The format of SRv6 SID NLRI is the same as that in BGP-LS<xref section="6" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9514"/>.</t>
      <t>An SRv6-enabled node <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> advertise at least one SRv6 SID associated with an End behavior encapsulated in the SRv6 NLRI for itself as specified in <xref target="RFC8986"/>.</t>
      <t>An SRv6-enabled node <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> advertise multiple instances of the SRv6 SID NLRI -- one for each of the SRv6 SIDs to be advertised.</t>
      <section anchor="SID-info">
        <name>SRv6 SID Information TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Information TLV is used to carry the SRv6 SID that do not require a particular neighbor in a SRv6 SID NLRI. This TLV <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be supported in BGP-LS-SPF to advertise SRv6 SIDs of each node.</t>
        <t>SRv6 SID Information TLV is a mandatory TLV in SRv6 NLRI. For each SRv6 SID NLRI, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain a single SRv6 SID Information TLV.</t>
        <t>When multiple SRv6 SID Information TLVs are received from a given node in an BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI for the same SID, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV in the NLRI.</t>
        <t>The format of SRv6 SID Information TLV is the same as <xref section="6.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9514"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig7">
          <name>SRv6 SID Information TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (16 octets) ...                                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 518</t>
        <t>Length: 16</t>
        <t>SID: 16-octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID as a 128-bit value.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 SID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be allocated from its associated locator. SRv6 SIDs that are NOT allocated from the associated locator <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="srv6-sid-attribute-tlvs">
      <name>SRv6 SID Attribute TLVs</name>
      <section anchor="srv6-endpoint-behavior-tlv">
        <name>SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV</name>
        <t>The Endpoint Behavior TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the behaviors associated with a SID. The BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support this TLV to enable the advertisement of behaviors associated with a SRv6 SID.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV is a mandatory TLV that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included once in the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI.</t>
        <t>When multiple SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLVs are received from a given node in the BGP-LS Attribute, the receiver <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the first occurrence of the TLV.</t>
        <t>The format of SRv6 Endpoint is the same as that in BGP-LS.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig8">
          <name>SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|        Endpoint Behavior      |      Flags    |   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1250</t>
        <t>Length: 4</t>
        <t>Endpoint Behavior: 2-octet field. The Endpoint behavior code point for this SRv6 SID.</t>
        <t>Flags: 1 octet of flags. No flags are currently defined, and this field <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.</t>
        <t>Supported behavior values for this TLV are defined in <xref target="endpoint-behaviors"/> of this document. Unsupported or unrecognized behavior values are ignored by the receiver.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="srv6-sid-structure-tlv">
        <name>SRv6 SID Structure TLV</name>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Structure TLV defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> is used to advertise the length of each individual part of the SRv6 SID as defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>. BGP-LS-SPF <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support this TLV to indicate the length of each individual part of the SRv6 SID of BGP-LS-SPF, which is useful in some scenarios using compressed SID.</t>
        <t>It is an optional TLV that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute for SRv6 SID NLRI and as a sub-TLV of the SRv6 End.X SID TLV.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Structure TLV <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> appear more than once in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute. If it appears more than once in the BGP-LS-SPF Attribute, then its parent SID TLV or NLRI <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <t>The format of SRv6 Structure TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS.</t>
        <figure anchor="ref-to-fig9">
          <name>SRv6 SID Structure TLV format</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    LB Length  |  LN Length    | Fun. Length   |  Arg. Length  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>where:</t>
        <t>Type: 1252</t>
        <t>Length: 4</t>
        <t>LB Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Block length in bits.</t>
        <t>LN Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Node length in bits.</t>
        <t>Fun. Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Function length in bits.</t>
        <t>Arg. Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Argument length in bits.</t>
        <t>The sum of all four sizes advertised in SRv6 SID Structure TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be less than or equal to 128 bits. If the sum of all four sizes advertised in the SRv6 SID Structure sub-TLV is larger than 128 bits, the parent TLV or NLRI <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the receiver.</t>
        <t>The SRv6 SID Structure sub-TLV is intended for informational use by the control and management planes. It <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used at a transit node (as defined in <xref target="RFC8754"/>) for forwarding packets. The typical use cases for this information are described in the <xref section="10" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9513"/> and <xref section="9" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC9352"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="endpoint-behaviors">
      <name>Advertising Endpoint Behaviors</name>
      <t>Endpoint behaviors are defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/>. The code points for the Endpoint behaviors are defined in the "SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors" registry of <xref target="RFC8986"/>. This section lists the Endpoint behaviors and their code points, which <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be advertised by BGP-LS-SPF and the TLVs in which each type <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> appear.</t>
      <table anchor="ref-to-tab5">
        <name>SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors in BGP-LS-SPF</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Endpoint Behavior</th>
            <th align="left">Endpoint Behavior Code Point</th>
            <th align="left">End SID</th>
            <th align="left">End.X SID</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">End(PSP, USP, USD)</td>
            <td align="left">1-4, 28-31</td>
            <td align="left">Y</td>
            <td align="left">N</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">End.X(PSP, USP, USD)</td>
            <td align="left">5-8, 32-35</td>
            <td align="left">N</td>
            <td align="left">Y</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document introduces no additional security vulnerabilities in addition to the ones as described in <xref target="RFC9552"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document has no IANA actions.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>This document refers extensively to the content of <xref target="RFC9514"/>, <xref target="RFC9513"/>, <xref target="RFC9352"/>, and <xref target="RFC9085"/>. The authors would like to thank the authors of these RFCs, they are James Uttaro, Hani Elmalky, Arjun Sreekantiah, Les Ginsberg, Shunwan Zhuang, Zhenbin Li, Zhibo Hu, Ketan Talaulikar, Peter Psenak, Clarence Filsfils, Ahmed Bashandy, Bruno Decraene, Stefano Previdi, Hannes Gredler, and Mach(Guoyi) Chen.</t>
      <t>The authors also would like to thank Acee Lindem for his valuable comments and suggestions.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references anchor="sec-combined-references">
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC9815" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9815" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9815.xml">
          <front>
            <title>BGP Link State (BGP-LS) Shortest Path First (SPF) Routing</title>
            <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
            <author fullname="A. Lindem" initials="A." surname="Lindem"/>
            <author fullname="S. Zandi" initials="S." surname="Zandi"/>
            <author fullname="W. Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx"/>
            <date month="July" year="2025"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Many Massively Scaled Data Centers (MSDCs) have converged on simplified Layer 3 (L3) routing. Furthermore, requirements for operational simplicity have led many of these MSDCs to converge on BGP as their single routing protocol for both fabric routing and Data Center Interconnect (DCI) routing. This document describes extensions to BGP for use with BGP Link State (BGP-LS) distribution and the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm. In doing this, it allows BGP to be efficiently used as both the underlay protocol and the overlay protocol in MSDCs.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9815"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9815"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4271" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml">
          <front>
            <title>A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)</title>
            <author fullname="Y. Rekhter" initials="Y." role="editor" surname="Rekhter"/>
            <author fullname="T. Li" initials="T." role="editor" surname="Li"/>
            <author fullname="S. Hares" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Hares"/>
            <date month="January" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document discusses the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is an inter-Autonomous System routing protocol.</t>
              <t>The primary function of a BGP speaking system is to exchange network reachability information with other BGP systems. This network reachability information includes information on the list of Autonomous Systems (ASes) that reachability information traverses. This information is sufficient for constructing a graph of AS connectivity for this reachability from which routing loops may be pruned, and, at the AS level, some policy decisions may be enforced.</t>
              <t>BGP-4 provides a set of mechanisms for supporting Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR). These mechanisms include support for advertising a set of destinations as an IP prefix, and eliminating the concept of network "class" within BGP. BGP-4 also introduces mechanisms that allow aggregation of routes, including aggregation of AS paths.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 1771. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4271"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4271"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9552" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9552" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9552.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP</title>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <date month="December" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many environments, a component external to a network is called upon to perform computations based on the network topology and the current state of the connections within the network, including Traffic Engineering (TE) information. This is information typically distributed by IGP routing protocols within the network.</t>
              <t>This document describes a mechanism by which link-state and TE information can be collected from networks and shared with external components using the BGP routing protocol. This is achieved using a BGP Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) encoding format. The mechanism applies to physical and virtual (e.g., tunnel) IGP links. The mechanism described is subject to policy control.</t>
              <t>Applications of this technique include Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) servers and Path Computation Elements (PCEs).</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 7752 by completely replacing that document. It makes some small changes and clarifications to the previous specification. This document also obsoletes RFC 9029 by incorporating the updates that it made to RFC 7752.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9552"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9552"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9085" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9085" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9085.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing</title>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="H. Gredler" initials="H." surname="Gredler"/>
            <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/>
            <date month="August" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths by encoding paths as sequences of topological subpaths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by routing protocols, e.g., by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3) within IGP topologies.</t>
              <t>This document defines extensions to the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) address family in order to carry SR information via BGP.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9085"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9085"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9514" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9514" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9514.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)</title>
            <author fullname="G. Dawra" initials="G." surname="Dawra"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/>
            <author fullname="D. Bernier" initials="D." surname="Bernier"/>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene"/>
            <date month="December" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within various topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological or functional sub-paths called "segments". These segments are advertised by various protocols such as BGP, IS-IS, and OSPFv3.</t>
              <t>This document defines extensions to BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) to advertise SRv6 segments along with their behaviors and other attributes via BGP. The BGP-LS address-family solution for SRv6 described in this document is similar to BGP-LS for SR for the MPLS data plane, which is defined in RFC 9085.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9514"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9514"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8814" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8814" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8814.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State</title>
            <author fullname="J. Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura"/>
            <author fullname="U. Chunduri" initials="U." surname="Chunduri"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="G. Mirsky" initials="G." surname="Mirsky"/>
            <author fullname="N. Triantafillis" initials="N." surname="Triantafillis"/>
            <date month="August" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines a way for a Border Gateway Protocol - Link
State (BGP-LS) speaker to advertise multiple types of supported
Maximum SID Depths (MSDs) at node and/or link granularity.</t>
              <t>Such advertisements allow entities (e.g., centralized controllers) to
determine whether a particular Segment Identifier (SID) stack can be
supported in a given network.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8814"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8814"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9352" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9352" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9352.xml">
          <front>
            <title>IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over the IPv6 Data Plane</title>
            <author fullname="P. Psenak" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Psenak"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="A. Bashandy" initials="A." surname="Bashandy"/>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene"/>
            <author fullname="Z. Hu" initials="Z." surname="Hu"/>
            <date month="February" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows a flexible definition of the end-to-end path by encoding it as a sequence of topological elements called "segments". It can be implemented over the MPLS or the IPv6 data plane. This document describes the IS-IS extensions required to support SR over the IPv6 data plane.</t>
              <t>This document updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9352"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9352"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9513" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9513" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9513.xml">
          <front>
            <title>OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)</title>
            <author fullname="Z. Li" initials="Z." surname="Li"/>
            <author fullname="Z. Hu" initials="Z." surname="Hu"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="P. Psenak" initials="P." surname="Psenak"/>
            <date month="December" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows a flexible definition of the end-to-end path by encoding it as a sequence of topological elements called segments. It can be implemented over an MPLS or IPv6 data plane. This document describes the OSPFv3 extensions required to support SR over the IPv6 data plane.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9513"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9513"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC9259" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9259" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9259.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)</title>
            <author fullname="Z. Ali" initials="Z." surname="Ali"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="S. Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima"/>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer"/>
            <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/>
            <date month="June" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how the existing IPv6 mechanisms for ping and traceroute can be used in a Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) network. The document also specifies the OAM flag (O-flag) in the Segment Routing Header (SRH) for performing controllable and predictable flow sampling from segment endpoints. In addition, the document describes how a centralized monitoring system performs a path continuity check between any nodes within an SRv6 domain.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9259"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9259"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8986" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8986.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="P. Camarillo" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Camarillo"/>
            <author fullname="J. Leddy" initials="J." surname="Leddy"/>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer"/>
            <author fullname="S. Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima"/>
            <author fullname="Z. Li" initials="Z." surname="Li"/>
            <date month="February" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming framework enables a network operator or an application to specify a packet processing program by encoding a sequence of instructions in the IPv6 packet header.</t>
              <t>Each instruction is implemented on one or several nodes in the network and identified by an SRv6 Segment Identifier in the packet.</t>
              <t>This document defines the SRv6 Network Programming concept and specifies the base set of SRv6 behaviors that enables the creation of interoperable overlays with underlay optimization.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8986"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8986"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8665" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8665" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8665.xml">
          <front>
            <title>OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing</title>
            <author fullname="P. Psenak" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Psenak"/>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="H. Gredler" initials="H." surname="Gredler"/>
            <author fullname="R. Shakir" initials="R." surname="Shakir"/>
            <author fullname="W. Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx"/>
            <author fullname="J. Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura"/>
            <date month="December" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological subpaths called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).</t>
              <t>This document describes the OSPFv2 extensions required for Segment Routing.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8665"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8665"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9086" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9086" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9086.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering</title>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
            <author fullname="S. Ray" initials="S." surname="Ray"/>
            <author fullname="J. Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong"/>
            <date month="August" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>A node steers a packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by prepending the packet with a list of segment identifiers (SIDs). A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based. SR segments allow steering a flow through any topological path and service chain while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node of the SR domain.</t>
              <t>This document describes an extension to Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) for advertisement of BGP Peering Segments along with their BGP peering node information so that efficient BGP Egress Peer Engineering (EPE) policies and strategies can be computed based on Segment Routing.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9086"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9086"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8402" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8402" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8402.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="L. Ginsberg" initials="L." surname="Ginsberg"/>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene"/>
            <author fullname="S. Litkowski" initials="S." surname="Litkowski"/>
            <author fullname="R. Shakir" initials="R." surname="Shakir"/>
            <date month="July" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm. A node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called "segments". A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based. A segment can have a semantic local to an SR node or global within an SR domain. SR provides a mechanism that allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SR domain.</t>
              <t>SR can be directly applied to the MPLS architecture with no change to the forwarding plane. A segment is encoded as an MPLS label. An ordered list of segments is encoded as a stack of labels. The segment to process is on the top of the stack. Upon completion of a segment, the related label is popped from the stack.</t>
              <t>SR can be applied to the IPv6 architecture, with a new type of routing header. A segment is encoded as an IPv6 address. An ordered list of segments is encoded as an ordered list of IPv6 addresses in the routing header. The active segment is indicated by the Destination Address (DA) of the packet. The next active segment is indicated by a pointer in the new routing header.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8402"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8402"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4202" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4202" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4202.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)</title>
            <author fullname="K. Kompella" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Kompella"/>
            <author fullname="Y. Rekhter" initials="Y." role="editor" surname="Rekhter"/>
            <date month="October" year="2005"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies routing extensions in support of carrying link state information for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS). This document enhances the routing extensions required to support MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE). [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4202"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4202"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8754" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8754.xml">
          <front>
            <title>IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="D. Dukes" initials="D." role="editor" surname="Dukes"/>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." surname="Previdi"/>
            <author fullname="J. Leddy" initials="J." surname="Leddy"/>
            <author fullname="S. Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima"/>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer"/>
            <date month="March" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing can be applied to the IPv6 data plane using a new type of Routing Extension Header called the Segment Routing Header (SRH). This document describes the SRH and how it is used by nodes that are Segment Routing (SR) capable.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8754"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8754"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 651?>


    <section anchor="contributors" numbered="false" toc="include" removeInRFC="false">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <contact fullname="Fan Yang">
        <organization>China Satellite Network Innovation Research Institute Co., Ltd.</organization>
        <address>
          <postal>
            <country>China</country>
          </postal>
          <email>yangf4@chinasatnet.com.cn</email>
        </address>
      </contact>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source:
H4sIAAAAAAAAA+0921YbSZLvnMM/5MKL2ZXUSFyMObPTg7k09ABmDe7L7NmH
UlVKqnapSl1ZBaaN51v2W/bLNiLyXpUSYENP747pM2OpKi+RkXGPyFS3211e
qtIq47tsbzbLbtN8zF5/d9E9vWSXfDzlecXeFnWFj4trXrKTi+vtF5dvr7fX
2OGHiuciLXLBqkJ16l5eHC0vRcNhya936Rk8YNh+eSkp4jyawkRJGY2qbpZ2
M3FddofjWVfMRl1RXm9316FdMRRFxisudpeX6lkSyU/4L/wTwz/jorzdZaJK
lpdEPZymAoG4up3B0CeHVzD/8lI6K3dZVdaiGqyvv1ofAEwlj3b1WpaXbory
/bgs6tkuO7384e3y0nt+C88SGCKveJnzqnuAYOJgUV1NihImB1yxNBfQpcf+
NolwHCaXdJqaB0U5jvL0t6gCoHbZcR3d8JRd8XiSF1kxTrmANnwapdku+w27
ZOnG5uZfJtSuFxdTeC2qkvNql50XPdbf2mavefor7sDbIoI1szitYP3w8Bda
CouLOq8QJfuTNI8QYgPo9z12UDhwfp9y/eARcP6S8l4CvZ4Lyr/22AXsa2bA
/Cu/rUvzzId0ryzjWnRgn+KeO+y7PK14wi4rJBhWjNjelJdpHNllvMdR/xJR
f7UGH1WnqYMowgc98ecn8NklwpbBjOycV0hMAE9eXFMb9pYLHpXxBJ4JYK4a
Wu0XvQ47rZJeABMaviz95WbjLzE+FFEFJIhA9uLcw9VPTdL7KY2KX9N6Dv0p
cM+KYZrxBXMTKX6QQ0kQptTF4CkuoF86rCvDCWxUZ5mE4SjK2c9y+ifHVhtk
DfMtzDjanIOwvCinMP41Cg2QB/nI+97r9Qir3S6LhkDIUUycflSULFcQipjn
UZkWgokagIsEO4tA0lzz7JZdxlEGtHYQVRHb5ygwBHtxdnmwL9Y6KPVYKhhH
8ZhAK5gZ6Ch/3yXSZC9OL9dYkgqJTURAlAO/VBPOLkHMAPFWSPkTdpSW8PEF
CNA1FmUg9NJqMmXDSMCYMH9cZ4S/Hk2IE0jaD49ixfOaEegZB4kejYFbcPIp
sD5snJgS8wwL6IsDz8qiKuIik1Aq1WAecqMDevP1BVMKA3pdpwlMFzFR1GXM
WamamrkBkqiC1WbFDTYbwb+gXJaXhtCWI8pi5HFQNzDEjMfpKI3h24wkFuCE
zWDJHXYzAcplQCR5Bf/DCWa87NJgglBU5LCJMBGuG17D0ILlRcJfiDUcnPZC
6SwcpQekCSBPuSYOED9pBRPcMgCsFhw4AfsBwQwz2VXt0/x1FmMO05TsJpWI
VrvTY1eTVJCyrAmbgLRZITjpWFhPWSQ1DIgQ6m3XdCUHWXP2hEiPoFGLsvOw
y72jkybMcTSLgOnTCqQ/TNYAC1dK1AKUwCQ7EanAwIK7s4KqhS0Uhd7wBMeq
YFlMr8ow3zRNEpRLy0urqHhpdcQTH1dpsZ/w1ceP//L2aP/VTn/r0yfFVoJW
/xDOYo9iLDQwfnfOkuvbHLzsw/oQ5PlcZpCxtTX49KkjqQfn4AFjDChcooLT
qDm/Yeenb0+Y4BmXWC7rjAvajHuZV/Ekohz5kn9IkWwSPgIGo7FgabAx3aro
wj/EiILAg72/RjlaC8OpgJfh7fISz+MiIe6kxiBhBf+1hqdSf7t8DbOO6pyA
hm9g9XVlH3iHgnhFSPDFSk9SsiNqfNkC1lxDuLDnly2ojVrChSnZ4lD4+g5S
OOGUi8aWWvbFbzFYMaCG3jKj2JBcNW30N2GYUV2SgAkPZ4eKEtjqKhUKKo1J
2HCw+AyBpSXgaRJdp0UpBUBBgxsKE+w6jXBUWg+Iy/lq1NGajjz9ce/cfMPt
luObJzfwzZNfMZgcUvgmOCi0Bm8B9G2ZgVTW8lZz0BeLayR7sBJGSBM8HwNC
wbaEFoSJWZVOlcHTY7j8K1fW/T+W4KurYLz9WqcllyRzCgZZDRNIHHA0uBk6
VYKtnL27vFrpyH/Z+Rv6/PbwP96dvD08wM+Xx3unp+bDkmpxefzm3emB/WR7
7r85Ozs8P5Cd4SnzHi2tnO39DG9wnStvLq5O3pzvna60FkHrlBIgRXKclbwi
cloC0REDYcuFv96/+J//7m8q9hr0+6+AveSXnf5L5DWgzlzORtwvvwJWb5ei
2QyMWxwF5A5uT1oBYjsk7CbFTc6QrntLS//6n4iZ/9plfxrGs/7mn9UDXLD3
UOPMe0g4az9pdZZIDDwKTGOw6T1vYNqHd+9n77vGu/PwT99mwDqs29/59s9L
UusT2Z6DeGR7Rltdnf4gNA2NCpTXyGuBloKaMm+3PCFIhDybZSDAkUe8OAWR
8B3DwAG7Ywc0xoxUmfd3BzQ+gk0CtSS/Q6cu/al/Qn/NV9iJ9fsbOzAcrWPf
ZVRYhJrpaJ8h5MzMxAbb2/iG1g0ehm7rggeddna8Tv31jS2aie0Z+8btqGYC
fWM6fdxlqyUfof6uomGfUVDo31cCO2NlUsN2XfmkNk3rkuBm0ZZonYPMJoo4
jZDvjDHjCDkaAq0WLXCC2NPEEkat1IBt4gBJQOoDlSC4o3WuxHJbkkoZSS5C
Qy8al8gASmIgzZM0pkCEGVDUsxmYj2D5mLF62ue0CyZNpZhS9yCZhQuRxpeD
HQLI0+FpJUw/Ulpq+m7JM0Kyu66eUlUpagTSY2Re4VSw4tAuKBuKRNPQ20dY
FoxBU9EUmbPEK72AQD8SmAWinqQzd02KOUD02I8gYNm0zqp0ls3ZdUEhP7Ds
Yg4+O6i7spgC8sbwJSfISEDr96UEDciBno7ItC/iuC4l4ysCwDU8HEyyhEYw
2Ry6RLRbRKhxQyMRqDlShktXysYE9gZ7JKrQZhoRrSwv0VYlBUevtjL0gFD0
rFxF9S8tgSwa0yrCYPrLA6BjMBHAy0IFqtggqqyxIQ0NNbzXF7wMb4JbjQWp
CSOhhD1FaP7+978vL7F11v7rB54NAs82qH8f3m2wTbbFttlLtsNePebZ8tK/
db/wPxTH/h8pHE+Cm79TsC0Bof7f3TNAcURbPgcKRiG5ErnmqaGgXXVUzSgd
w3YqXROiDklHqFnIAyDSkCjcRS23I79LvO2yTfmVVrfLBt0CXDqQgynPkp5k
bGNNSKJHEaHUg6W6INHh44V08wD84C7cvbmbj+QHYVlB6eLjTReXs8tA2ghe
dayyUqxPik4LsTfdIUkSpRuOyRj1dOS3qCMHW2Dm9tT45IxZlKFU0T1QgkhJ
q5YzIme9qkvytUgc3BrJD+ChwloHkY8OVS5U+oaG0Y3ScV6UpBukfJ5VCg6N
ssbeSgnUmgLNcCMeFaRzhl51DVEys4DCBPu4ig+68ECbNr4h1rIs0A5rWBZG
NSO6M/AUK2HjUo2oyzGPwIPFkMvxGuhjXpJTaTS6VLNGpbt61pG/IaMiSUdk
w1aBnugXg2fPnUYKTG0zVKjBjtEZjDnsVj4mCgMWBlR2PJd0geGCc4mFGLEL
7nkGnYfyh9kq1mKVpLH38x/MXHHXJNgfwVJBdCNAFVG+jTtQQN6KSUnrlyqA
uIlDkkm9gQFJ6nZy2T25tCGEWqG7EYoQ7myycVbERG4K7pWT7y6wTZd4cQUQ
MMbY7q0JvslxT/bO94wQEpOoVI8Rig57Q+Rvg6pm/lu1KMdzxElFPRRybQJ2
HnRF02BSNpamReoTTbmMQbl2kNUnKLm+2JJhX27LMPYEGrxhKbTNmcb7tklz
97SQaAqRM+O3H6Ks5sx+x7e9Xs9/jw+eCpKgXTPw7RpPiFmrJmTXgMvf8+0a
DKCjjOoAE8xQ0WK0DUmvKioQgpnEsWL9a1q+VIxAjaQnhRqQlr6rLXgSCEWO
PgSbgixnswjECT6MWF8pWINe5CH3ocQiGfsJB3bMFDPNdDbA62n3JRW+CNnA
tt8a3UmAGmRpDptinF/QxG1lSFqsUPzLiUUpnDeKMJMAa4XdqEtlmaDgVP20
WLc1L9LDyUUVgSjtEbVIdAodPc54VKLgwWh3BGqzTG5QjuxdnBASZSOKmqJV
wxPtBJK+JJFj9IARbVJwkAo24iTGNc0KWAfFDj3yUe5g1bRGmuaTWqZWHMrQ
WWVn0Yd0Wk+19SGAzEaVsXqMLljYigmYBeS7THCpppLyFBn6/Qw5KqNTEpnR
ebMofg87NySTgiJ2VImEjQ/zROJB5x9aIaOIXZ4cON72taYzq7c7SrhryrFN
hKin0sQBzK23cASzs4tiNhc7zfdBvOT1dMjJPQdAhYsFmPZmksYTS8eY16D1
s5ULniOtTCn1qCxFnOvFxeXFmkHz2+MVJL2Vd8Gm75pNTRano2YO6/Vef9vw
5audbcWXkpBde8gg8jdeFozMvLn4z71Vog8hF4pPYUnYG8BFN+Ma4GttxXHv
MAdbTczdi1aDh2wG8Z5KJkVJIrNJs6isNNbMqA79td2lJ0bSBB2BPHGogaxV
2NMsjW8l0GSKYlkOmEKCxLjK3RFXgEeBkgyHpjwVZguPCb49mD7vEihIgoA9
H3OBGJMLjhxUwnMsGZAQWc90jqq58iBTHSxkqQNnD2Uuli/cRaUUSVYqwBCV
4FCgqkUMJBwXaDL70gJN8zir0cAG89g4tuSRkEjoICy9g5+21YerTfNBPpLL
f3d5IE1MfPeTefZ70EmbmXCnDaXSBgJqQIyQ2PGQoLOAoMAoC6/oPc1zQKwS
yDd6IiAnXRAwkU6qoTyJcOtGd72cg5PellF3dz8VedkiDDd0TWaTHyNFrSsl
mT+JGdQN8lM2XRooXvu5zjnwl4Ek4HO3/UMEDjPHaaz9UBwCsKr84KGrcgLZ
2NYy/i86tyeoyIkOpTanxLn1df0VGuU3d02/W1g+CoRCTMi8SRj+KihJk05n
maFiS8Hr2maVdSBNyg6Qk5IDOlCF+LPALAAEq2CsNehCoLdWS0VZs2KkvkPk
inZUw4Cva6cjC06YHLoi18W5gHZoURsYg16/t2GCB5JVPYf5i/3lL3eXH+KD
3jU84LuG03v3kHEeNI/dib6cxz4YMO89ubbu+/zJ4Ah6uhu+p+uLtMWuLiaq
fVf3B+XqyqdmLGgqPVlyHPRTQ7CW+pW7Nj+i5IAHIDhhpbau3t7ewiI7WR7j
DPywKJNT30A2Cr5+y6N4ovIbZIvlpgFyU3+ww4Y6HOo66bSQouyYKriOCnmN
VY1RhEH+qFUK0TA59lwdRGVOIGJT4TqsyqXSSOqaUjgFggwN4jLmCzc0Omjs
HjvEhqqr1JcxlhbK4ixA+AeZ1M4ybcdZQMijN0M1nGSgKaz7Hjdo4VQDGdBu
kXAXfyFnp0xpMfwFxFKz5E3ujBpRKq8XgnPAqlrPp09riGXcL2dgo8l67Mga
Vxyr51VclcLeGtCFGWAXSOPdY3iCqh5Ve8eEm2VRTlrRqmJPyUlUCmvWOa50
5BpILW1lB2wRkLRlbHJAa2W1v+rbqaZg/OIU2VK0hnINljM6JkGiFitbzluv
TOoJNSmB0VD+KqVFFcSy3NVyZbMcxTLkia2t9LYf3nWx7lLtvyEV7CPT9fxD
zGeOFWs9TZquFb8wTJbzdDwZFuU3GVYd66i2SbaEIJVOB86N4laBCM5a70NX
pAnA2Fiwn2dQZZaUmzGZvRTaVJksoyS6Mck5rP96CA32PEknE0gagITPqIK7
nqmYHf9AFoS05xwBoXhESq5komqwlJNJpcuuzCarRMXuAa8gUXgu6lIZyc6G
t7FviN3yAA0wNAvDwpmilGjRNcALhsxZnS8aNSmL2YwnsloUcHq4K+Oo8Ng6
bxpPCkvRUFgcwbojsLG/EfV0GpVyp7jFnM4euRhUqojK2e8rtfMbLSywA8rw
qpf/YBV369u64s7nEzNTu+JOdjodsNd1nmCcllOowa9jcyroVJneS6ZnIuw1
avUCZXp+xd1A21CBDXp4xV2o8+MK7miEVsGdj7yPq1a+eJlav9lD6u4a7s0C
jiLbLfklioEubmkOP8xB/ClApqgafgoaI3Jl9BiamSfSPaXHJGfRAjEju7V+
ZZ3nOg4t05rQFI296w1TWy7ABa7ItGlnO9tLxJLvw4tDdsGRpLzlmE3WqQzM
A2RUu4/VwibCIdt1zy5gfFuusW6MvAfk4xdg/n403o+qBsfPIY97gx0NYv6M
YMdZIeV/TuFRndjxcrgvCrIglEnrg7mmA8MqThgy0Rxz78zL8HuLNZ52iPtk
/lhjlQA/hOXdykXJ8v5EYlltqFxJhePgUZOMRxgXgYXUefpr3QLA7intUCHX
qgwvbXJgUXqGcePxBMMbCG8xhQ9JgZ2AtNMRG/EI63oEkOV7kC6HSA5XJ93T
oz0daqTTAM7U2qYAxGExEKly0IGmgWOpY0AjVw6ecRkISW1jX8UZRIMQDDab
NbI6Luwb9D0XDhoxKQjaKeeKW0p7vqGZX5NH9ZSV4UQzm3O7aUaV0II5tcBw
3+J2+HvlocEPldJ82qAgsYNUHBfTmTr7QgekQHNXJIT1ySOVKXtYRUOgmOFr
SSZ78pJMk+J8rTWaC4Wp1cTvNnrxtFD8iFKg0rO4pYnwHRn5BSYEqZRgjQJM
z4ELmgfzCjjDWoB+5v99heL3hgKMXRmABr9Y16cAaeB/z1UqvOkHGn1zIhxo
VGHGPl4ssrzUrKchVdtkvlbh8FWwCsGp0JBBndQJHfhhbx307q/3BihuW3E5
VbCsQpy6qMY9Wmtrb5vVZtIubSBE5QbYCxtx3+n1/WK9NRNlURbt/WO8csbY
6m/o4IIbpfVRZ8VVyPBBZcT88G2wmau2KWphayZU4NSEegkeKcxawFyZ4qhG
FdWNFH66TELZ4hROqks8uylDsBHYGFEGFiSoV32c0uSg1BhpKOe7uT5QG20L
mPtPW8AMQMOY280FAzhyAjprrXLojs3kEmyE4WeqDbdZe83iu+xdy2MTmv0J
eHVSFGsoUmXRO7k4jU8T6NITay/zHndbmyz3NGuh3wYmZM4ugT2XyWcwB1uD
oTOoy2LQ0q/LnOFxmnbIaBZRnfTpBvVRmFYAqAPGtHk4HR2kwcO1JSLFC4jA
cGJC57nxdpUiM2eM8Tw5TKw8QazIAOTWeAh9civoNDrOq6tXwOYrtSd3Gt3C
Sga2Ao4NaY3G6tMHsxM+y4pb7qYsqH5N+Tp4exK4XzQNEXug3Bt9hMW+JaBY
Tr+8NLU4diij94idfZS32IiU2LiG8SPpVpFHZ81hyRpDPgPoGJlL9iFpJvHB
JDqkGDFkmfhvl5ccQRWhcydDsxIFaOBLcRhMHyuDX7t3fokEyTafhslf1h7s
Pbsx152N5oeS9jSmyZfynA43k175+CBySeU9Drrip/LIJYTjC700UPnE01rT
uUQIo5oTB6A/blk98wg9cgG2fipOkpTRTY4OMaVycLAhBy7kjRHxGpcblOAk
e7CygGGGCe9NaCzHWbFZ2dNUnn91157nBJ2ZsMkpOqytvbjnh6Ih+bTOdqxy
8/fNN08CRNA63zLW+X2y3DXVf2zXBPRfDsI1Aboqfj7Kd9lm267Cy1JI5ROr
dtFSzCzHhes5NwfGZlMIjloIduvyq8m8MnhZPWB8pVQ0i9VsScwgWBKzutpM
K2DRuNGbbrLhi8+jYWF26NiZDkmbYgCSeXPOovUeciTsYQfB7gPBXn+ia1/V
3S26wA7wZo8ZzUF88xCTf3RpbpLEVOPL62eEW7Tv14mAxcVVwv2+ghED9eMO
vTUTdv+wwkCr80On3ly8/aNOvflWiaNfcTfsEUh7CFQfjPc4raGAP340B0Vl
wZDUUdC12Wuw/VJ5hfa4y0lu3Cak6Ex16Vjz4uzqnSRJMSnqDElKlgclHAks
qUtzQcrVoTQM3RKLRqEvst51kSZ0yZdIfzPnL4STJ1alJ/dlivVdsaEuwl53
9Ie/mWV7YLK3Nj/gztTME/vZ2w2t+oJoe3j+Ntz9cRlcp2jI1x/Owj6u6hom
T+i4TR6dvTUlTV7xEKWapFYwwyvmweuh0HctcuUR6KDAg84Uzxf9+pBDwoO1
be6BtzDMJD0lzKagDPegUbrmxjVk3mpuDZsc7GQkZzUZSacwzu0l73kxQjCX
SHSr6LwyIDqUYSIEC2vc7itxW1jPhnh9IzVBqDjOFr0vrGlzKr01IacuSE7T
WYOSH6WiQlM+lnVCKsxd8mINtnjxn6Xdgj5haBt99SQhsBbPlhfH3WzUXn91
GZ/YWZufwXNm/NzrQD7LZbR/ZxxvvlzU4gmheN6MUdAr3fZzRi6T3FOaDjZB
+BS2d8mMU5ZOOZoe2ye2pUJB4mbafHX+VZ4ukZdWOheeqIi/PPb1ORejfEEG
pnlGY06hvHsBg1sev/hmFjfp8iXpDU2nDf/eHV6Jwqmk50adtRrkqdMZUta7
hAVWjrP/OWpK5/IMmVNJUaZ7lxoHzsQpVaTY8wXSa7+/tbUWrmxv76yjO9Xh
ZsdhQPhVyah1E5xLXWgENbVzctsGH20ksxYUmaGNmNvDOQ+nN/8BZG0PT9Ay
PEtVP3yImSovy/XKtL1rc0nL2wq4nJvz4L4ho37OQrG1cYEkivVFB1Er1OUk
2Rb4PHSd667n+NDAres1tP6yvs+D/J7GW3J7tuVIPkJb8xjPh/ps9Xe8Po0i
+UAf31Pa9MSxmXWeY+QYOn6HhRFwa+lsB+wcdegmWFln5YFXV+fkSVuFqXgO
2FQF8FyfsLXSVMZzEOgRpQIEz0Z+SeecszptKDGkY0E0lqmubBSeQWhw1e0y
r8qx0Ui0qN3zG0O7/HHVHIJosWWz7WJOdMvudPkg5VerFAVTaRNYdA+GtzAn
73rvidvAVde0dLy23Lio7kmJ0DoiNgUeRzl/q70ls7l03MepIrWnQVKV2lcn
prHSEeRGNh9l83yP4KGU+32QyMODTxrGgUU+Imvgi6Juobiay7oBnPphNMO3
Xz0U+/G5PZSF9X2L//6ZKt7+maAI+lIvWUt5Nxl6sU8FxoPvUvW3lWH+POVL
nl4yhrM5FkzSkpJOVqtrhyF0cA9PvzV6E0Ct3q1S8YY5246qOwdtGqXATvVT
8OXjA7XODzkEb1IiW/5REVhvW3R9x8Jp3PIv93xIYH0BveuVy5nDGe3o38Mj
f75dMUf/BuF7XBTwOSKAPmwLDeOvWvRZpOUfo5I/KLN3WjXTARa7pyBjsLXu
i211z/JzlE737omunRdOLXSsQy1aCOpKL6M4nube4S8pcJZltCa7pHGgrpMw
68dtaF2zyhXqukaWglzXdWDmp1jYO+ewMV5xmAP0xTinzG5zQpxj8QWBVhZe
VmUd00XOzd9YaL39jHShubSSfCa3xtW5fW1ORb3nLT+kJFVfavY5U3v1A6Y+
2BT6puq34ewvHdV0movKcrkgO0XfT1iFSjncYo36nqSZH1AyvzdB9o8u2Hfh
985ItG0ifw/NEX/1qzVusnJxYo1ym2mlOopH9DS/bSB0Qao+0AEL9S++WEC1
IXfTW9pXrfgP0oqnr80U8P303L0biR3Vec8+wDuLyrF98Ixa8VXbk/Hp5Z7c
0GBrENSIZrUtRWHm0Rmo1+ArvNeiCEgR7/3R9YbnDx6FysSCgzi4nT/MkbpO
KDyEsxvzh9jTdxAFhkC2FPVU3tmUAVLrkmHBUfPam0XyiC7dFUJJk5LxX2t5
jEJflkSyp3rgTFVY+mnRCWIii8qxvG4oN1N03IL5z5FNi6fEsxrmp2Kd1ASs
07muWJ8RQXkP7lA0lp4W3bciLyFwr2iROUaQyNLcSWUNCnsR1KMvtzbxPBj9
coNzk4ssCpNWXHU7o3MnCFAcCdd0cSAOX6puw3r9df/8mLo/xJwv8ysxldu8
5xyRbpmcQt5G0TSTvJN9jifatLBcM+Jq4pdw6tjo/eNQzjRsX7t50+bRPxnh
0HfWZHTZ17wJZYVu6hrP5grfYKGno2x1ea++gFH2ItuH8laUVSDNrSrvQm5M
6Ok+wnKBz+gtUfidtTlsYuqeIrx5b512dwouvPy4g/cE4/8drCFc/e5mhw12
uhsBNX3Hfjafzh31pqBsjHbHtro7HbYx6G5shcY6b43aTnBtLfa3Gj/LKDXM
Kh4RrUu8KmlfZWll/bOpejI/WWhKKikJ66SnhR7hus5y6O/+DKRbXYqEUKhL
RYL3+jicR7+tcB9Ek4hAkb/DENvf7wDGjd/nxU3GEymqAn1LTGKa3yal39ZW
IKK0U4Ek15/o2G8bzrcN+XO4zduI1OnSupog4m+odJaurqBJIiwgd96bYn3o
L0W+/JGI7yM82fOuqqKy6LDjKE/ZYTaNsve3HdB+v9Sgv0rO39OFHJMOKEzB
vktzMeTluMMuJ3V+A6rkb5M6wh9O+RtYu0PA9mmKn9NhwY7rDvsrr6DNVZRF
NcAXlR12wfHSuwsBPsX7DtvPIhkIOkozMUrxFyT3Jnhv+etIwDoSgOR1WcMu
HPC4jHgOZvVlxUcRPLkoOTg3KQGO2/4d6KmMlxJZZyADXnxXF7fpGtsHyOyF
igonVHQcQtxezOnwQcLlr6PitqKLSfFAcH3Uj8jCHKIej/EWCk0XwMxsCKoF
Py8v/S87PbLlgoIAAA==

-->

</rfc>
